header advert
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_27 | Pages 24 - 24
1 Jul 2013
Kamalanathan S Sawalha S Atkinson D
Full Access

Trauma ward rounds (TWR) are usually preceded by trauma meetings where previous day admissions are discussed and management decisions made. Therefore, one would expect TWR to be relatively quick and efficient. We measured the distance walked during TWR over a one week period and examined effects of number of patients and their location on distance walked.

We used a pedometer (after calibration) to measure the distance walked by a single consultant orthopaedic surgeon during his trauma week. The consultant conducted a daily TWR after the trauma meeting where previous day admissions and postoperative patients were reviewed. We initially measured the distance required to visit five wards where trauma patients could be found (trial distance) and used that for comparison. We recorded number of patients reviewed and wards visited daily.

The distance walked daily during TWR was 1.37–2.4 times longer than trial distance. There was no correlation between number of patients reviewed or number of wards visited and distance walked. Despite the larger number of patients towards the end of the week (33 patients on 3 wards on last TWR), the distance walked remained shorter than on the first TWR (11 patients on 3 wards). The distance walked during the whole week was 30.8 miles!

We found no correlation between number of patients reviewed or their location and distance walked during TWR. The relatively shorter distances walked towards the end of the week could be explained by more familiarity and therefore, better organisation by the team as the week progressed.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 225 - 225
1 Mar 2010
Richards J Atkinson D
Full Access

Squeaking in ceramic total hip joint replacements has become a controversial topic. This study aims to document the incidence of squeaking and other noise generation in a single surgeon series for ceramic on ceramic total hip joint replacements. Possible aetiological for squeaking causes are explored.

All patients from public and private who received ceramic on ceramic total hip joint replacements (Stryker trident-accolade) from 2002 to 2007 were identified via the New Zealand Joint registry. Following ethics approval all patients were contacted for a phone interview to question as to whether they had noted any noise generation. Patients who demonstrated noise generation were reviewed in clinic for full history and examination. Data including age, sex, weight, primary diagnosis, head size and cup size were obtained from clinical notes. Post operative x-rays were reviewed to analyse cup abduction and version.

Forty one ceramic total hip joint replacements in a total of thirty seven patients were reviewed via telephone interviews. Three patients complained of squeaking in the ceramic bearing while one patient complained of a grinding and one other of clicking. Two of the three who had recognised the squeaking were both able to reproduce the squeaking in the clinic room. The third patient was noted to have crepitus from anterior patello-femoral osteoarthritis. There was no statistical difference in age, weight, primary diagnosis or head size. In terms of abduction and version of the acetabular cups that squeaked, one had twenty seven degrees of ante-version and forty seven degrees of abduction and the other fifteen degrees of anteversion and thirty degrees of anteversion. Four cups lay outside the recommended fifteen-thirty five degrees of anteversion and thirty five-fifty five degrees of abduction yet showed no squeaking. Neither patient is troubled by the squeaking and neither would seek revision surgery. The incidence of squeaking in ceramic on ceramic total hip joint replacements appears to be around five percent with a similar number of patients experiencing other noises. The position of the acetabular cup does not appear to be the sole contributor to the noise and other aetiological causes need to be further investigated.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 9 - 9
1 Mar 2008
Malek S Atkinson D Gillies R Nicole M
Full Access

To determine the effect of experience of the operator and the effect of type of anaesthesia used on re-manipulation rates of fracture distal radius manipulated in A& E, a retrospective review of distal radius fractures manipulated in A& E between January 2000 and January 2001. Operators were divided into two categories: junior (SHO grade) and senior (higher grade) doctor.

54 patients with fracture distal radius had manipulation in A& E. 15 male and 39 female patients with mean age of 61 years (52 for males and 63 for females) were included.

42 (78%) fractures were manipulated under haematoma block (18 by junior, 23 by senior doctor) and 12 (22%) fractures were manipulated under Bier block (1 by junior, 11 by senior doctor). Operator’s grade was not clearly mentioned in one case. 13 out of 54 patients (24%) needed fracture re-manipulation under general anaesthesia. 12 out of 42 fractures manipulated under haematoma block (30%) needed re-manipulation compared to only one out of 12 fractures (8%) manipulated under Bier block (p=0.25). 9 out of 19 fractures manipulated by junior doctors needed re-manipulation compared to only 4 out of 34 fractures manipulated by senior doctors (p=0.007). Haematoma block was used for 18 out of 19 cases by junior doctors and for 23 out of 34 cases by senior doctors (p=0.038). Average number of fracture clinic follow-ups was 4 (range 2 to 8).

Junior doctors had significantly higher preference for haematoma block and significantly higher re-manipulation rate. Re-manipulation rates were higher with fractures manipulated under haematoma block compared to Bier block.

Adequate training and supervision should be provided for SHOs while performing such procedures in A& E. Use of Bier block as a regional anaesthesia for manipulation of distal radius fractures in A& E should be encouraged.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 321 - 321
1 May 2006
Andrews S Bentall S Atkinson D
Full Access

To measure for evidence of early subsidence of Accolade tapered uncemented femoral stems. To quantify any subsidence and to identify factors which may predispose to this.

A retrospective audit of patients who have received Accolade stem total hip joint replacement in Hawkes Bay Hospital from October 2003 to October 2004. Post operative and follow up x rays (within one year of surgery) were reviewed and position of femoral component in the femur was measured and adjusted for magnification and angulation.

Thirty-eight patients were identified. Patients age averaged 66 years old (44 – 82yo). Results show an mean subsidence of 2.8mm with a range of 0 – 13mm.

There is evidence of early subsidence of Accolade femoral stems. In cases of large subsidence under sizing of the femoral component was identified as the most significant contributing factor.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 283 - 283
1 Nov 2002
Arden D Atkinson D
Full Access

Introduction: Large numbers of women are taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or an oestrogen containing contraceptive pill. They are being advised that these medications can increase their risk of developing deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and there has been considerable recent publicity.

Aim: To determine the practice of New Zealand orthopaedic surgeons when women taking such medications present for major surgery.

Method: A postal survey was sent to all New Zealand orthopaedic surgeons. The current practice was compared with recently revised national guidelines and manufacturers advice.

Results: The response rate was 80% (118/148). There was wide variation in the beliefs surrounding the peri-operative use of both of these medications. Of the surgeons who replied, 44% indicated that they would routinely advise discontinuing the combined oral contraceptive pill peri-operatively for major surgery, 24% indicated that they would routinely advise discontinuing HRT peri-operatively. The mean duration that surgeons would discontinue the medication pre-operatively was 13 days for the contraceptive pill and nine days for HRT. The mean time for re-starting medication post-operatively was 18 days for the contraceptive pill and 13 days for HRT.

Recently released New Zealand guidelines recommend that HRT should be stopped for at least 30 days prior to elective surgery and withheld for 90 days following surgery. Less than 3% of surgeons appeared to be routinely following this recommendation. Most manufacturers of combined oral contraceptive pills recommend stopping the medication for at least four weeks prior to elective surgery. Only 25% of surgeons routinely practice in accordance with these recommendations.

Discussion: This survey demonstrated substantial differences between actual clinical practice, recently revised national guidelines and manufacturers’ advice. These differences need to be brought to the attention of surgeons and guideline producers alike. A review of international literature and recommendations revealed that these guidelines are very conservative and that strong evidence for them is lacking. Issues to be considered include the practicalities of implementing such recommendations; the associated risks of discontinuing medication; the presence of other risk factors; the type of surgery; the use of thromboprophylaxis and not least the wishes of the patient. The possible medico-legal implications are uncertain and caution in this area is advised.