header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 19 - 19
1 Feb 2012
Dramis A Dunlop D Grimer R Aldlyami E O'Connell N Elliott T
Full Access

Propionibacteria are organisms of low virulence, although they do cause deep periprosthetic infections. The aim of this study was to show that Propionibacteria do not always cause a significant rise in ESR and CRP.

Between May 2001 and May 2004, we identified 77 patients with prosthetic joint replacements colonised with Propionibacteria, 47 males and 30 females. There were 47 hip joint replacements, 27 knee joint replacements, 2 endoprosthetic replacements of the femur and 1 shoulder joint replacement. We retrieved successfully the medical records of 66 patients in order to identify the number of patients treated for an infected prosthetic joint arthroplasty. The pre-operative values of ESR and CRP were recorded. For the purposes of this study, an ESR rate of 30mm/hr or higher and a CRP level of 10mg/lt or higher were considered to be suggestive of infection and were deemed a positive result.

All of the 77 patients had both ESR and CRP measured pre-operatively. In only 16 (21%) both ESR and CRP were higher than 30mm/hr and 10mg/l respectively. In 33 patients (43%) with prosthetic joint replacements colonised with Propionibacteria, the pre-operative values of ESR and CRP were normal. 23 patients were treated for an infected prosthetic joint arthroplasty. In 7 (30%) of those patients both ESR and CRP were normal.

This suggests that normal pre-operative values of ESR and CRP in suspected failed prosthetic joint replacements might not exclude infection, if the causative organism is of low virulence such as Propionibacteria.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 111 - 111
1 Feb 2012
Aldlyami E Vivek A Grimer R Carter S Abudu A Tillman R
Full Access

All patients referred to our unit with previously untreated metastatic renal cancer were included in this review. We investigated likely prognostic factors including age, sex, site, synchronous or metachronous metastasis, stage of the disease and the type of treatment received.

From 1976 until 2004, a total of 198 patients were treated by our unit for renal metastases. 15 patients were excluded because they were referred after failure of previous treatment or only had advice. 96 patients were already known to have renal metastasis with their diagnosis having been made between 0.2 and 17 years from the diagnosis of primary cancer (mean 4 years). 33 patients presented to us with a pathological fracture and were found to have renal cancer. A total of 54 patients had multiple metastases and 129 had a solitary metastasis. The cumulative survival from the time of diagnosis of the bone metastasis is 70 percent at 1 year, 40% at 3 years and 18% at 5 years. In patients with a solitary metastasis, the overall survival was 74% at 1 year and 45% at 3 years, whereas in patients with multiple metastases it was 55% at 1 year and 22% at 3 years. (p=0.02) In patients with a solitary metastasis treated by excision of the metastasis, the survival at 1 year was 86% as compared to 38% for those that were treated with just a local procedure. Cox multivariate analysis shows that survival was better in those with solitary metachronus metastasis who underwent a radical procedure.

Conclusion

We recommend a radical procedure for patients who present with a solitary renal metastasis, particularly those with a disease-free interval of more than one year.