Correct femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is critical in obtaining good clinical outcomes. We aimed to delineate whether any difference exists between the anteromedial (AM) and trans-tibial (TT) portal femoral tunnel placement techniques on the primary outcome of ACLR graft rupture. Adult patients (>18year old) who underwent primary ACLR between January 2011 – January 2018 were identified and divided based on portal technique (AM v TT). The primary outcome measure was graft rupture. Univariate analysis was used to delineate association between independent variables and outcome. Binary logistic regression was utilised to delineate odds ratios of significant variables. 473 patients were analysed. Median age at surgery was 27 years old (range 18–70). A total of 152/473, (32.1%) patients were AM group compared to 321/473 (67.9%) TT. Twenty-five patients (25/473, 5.3%) sustained graft rupture. Median time to graft rupture was 12 months (IQR 9). A higher odds for graft rupture was associated with the AM group, which trended towards significance (OR 2.03; 95% CI 0.90 – 4.56, p=0.081). Older age at time of surgery was associated with a lower odds of rupture (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.86 – 0.98, p=0.014). There is no statistically significant difference in ACLR graft rupture rates when comparing anteromedial and trans-tibial portal technique for femoral tunnel placement. There was a trend towards higher rupture rates in the anteromedial portal group.
Successful return to work (RTW) is a crucial outcome after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients under 65 years old. We aimed to determine whether TKA facilitated RTW in patients <65 years, whose intention was to return preoperatively. We prospectively assessed 106 TKA patients under 65 years over a 1 year period both preoperatively and at 1 year following surgery. Patient demographics were collected including Oxford knee score, Oxford-APQ, VAS pain/health scores and EQ-5D. A novel questionnaire was distributed to delineate pre-operative employment status and post-operative intentions. This included questions on nature of pre and post-operative occupation, whether joint disease affected their ability to work and details of retirement plans and how this was affected by their knee. 69 patients intended to return to work following their TKA. Following arthroplasty, 57/69 patients (82.6%) returned to work at a mean of 16.4 weeks (SD 16.6). Univariate analysis showed significant factors facilitating RTW included, pre-operative oxford knee score, pre-operative Oxford-APQ score and pre-operative EQ-5D score. These were not predictive on multivariate analysis. This study finds that TKA facilitates return to work in 83% of those who intend to return to work following their surgery. This could have significant positive and health and financial cost implications for the individual, health system and society.
