header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 159 - 159
1 Feb 2003
Nicol SG George MD Pearse MF
Full Access

Impaction bone grafting has become an established technique in restoring acetabular and femoral bone stock loss during hip replacement surgery. This study presents our preliminary results using this technique to restore acetabular bone stock loss during cemented total hip replacement, with particular reference to the use of a preformed perforated metallic mesh to contain major acetabular defects.

In 52 patients (55 hips), acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone grafting was undertaken during total hip replacement (7 primary and 48 revision, of which 13 had previously undergone multiple revisions). The mean age at the time of surgery was 68 (range 34 to 88). In 31 cases (30 segmental or combined acetabular deficiencies, and one case of pelvic discontinuity) a pre-formed stainless steel mesh was utilised to contain the impacted morsellised bone graft. There were no perioperative deaths or deep infections and few complications (2 non-recurrent dislocations and 2 deep vein thromboses). At a mean follow-up of 40 months (range 18 to 91 months) there have been no revisions for any reason. Three patients who died before a minimum follow-up of 18 months have been excluded. Of the 49 patients (52 hips) remaining, clinical hip scores (Merle d’Aubigne and Postel) averaged 5.3 for pain, 4.2 for walking ability, and 5.3 for range of movement (with 16 patients in Charnley group A, 14 in group B, and 19 in group C). There was one case of radiographic loosening, with a radiolucent line > 2mm diameter in all 3 zones of DeLee and Charnley, although the cup has not migrated and the patient remains pain-free. All other cases show radiographic changes suggestive of ongoing graft incorporation.

We consider that the use of preformed metallic meshes extends the scope of impaction bone grafting to include cases where major segmental acetabular deficiencies are encountered, allowing restoration of bone stock and an anatomical centre of hip rotation, with encouraging preliminary clinical and radiological results.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 85-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 38 - 39
1 Jan 2003
Naique SB Madhav RT Pearse MF
Full Access

31 cases of high-energy proximal tibial fractures were retrospectively analysed. The series included 22 cases of Schatzker VI and 9 cases of proximal tibial extraarticular fractures. There were 7 females and 24 males, with average age being 45years(26–94). There were 12 open fractures ( 1 Gustilo grade1, 10 grade 3b and one 3c); while 19 cases had Tcherne’s grade 2–3 injury. 4 patients developed compartment syndromes requiring fasciotomy. All fractures were treated with preliminary ligamentotaxis using a unilateral external fixator. In addition, Open fractures underwent radical debridement with the one case of 3c requiring vascular reconstruction. CT scan was then done to assess the joint incongruity ,anatomy of the fracture, and to aid in decision making. The fractures were then fixed using percutaneous techniques and a circular external fixator. Minimal open reduction was resorted to in cases with significant joint depression. In all, 26 cases were managed using percutaneous techniques alone while 5 required minimal open reduction and screw fixation. Bone grafting was done in 6 cases and 11 required a plastics procedure for soft tissue reconstruction. The results were assessed using the radiological Rasmussen’s criteria and the clinically using he IKSS knee score. At a mean follow-up of 31mths, the mean time to metaphyseal union was 18weeks (6–25weeks);. 28 patients had good to excellent clinical scores, while 3 had a fair result. The radiologic assessment graded 12 cases as excellent and 19 as good. Complications included 2 cases with flap edge necrosis, 2 with severe pin tract sepsis, 1 with proximal DVT and one case with septic arthritis.

We conclude that the above treatment protocol yields promising results, preserving good knee function without prejudicing future need for arthroplasty.