Knee arthroscopy with debridement is commonly performed to treat osteoarthritis and degenerative meniscal tears in older adults; however robust evidence does not support sustained benefit from this procedure. Current Canadian guidelines advise against its use as first line treatment. Characterizing the use of this low value procedure will facilitate efforts to maximize quality of care, minimize harm and decrease healthcare costs. We sought to understand:

Data were derived from National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS), the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) and the National Physician Database for years 2011-12 to 2019-20. The study included all elective knee arthroscopies (CCI codes 1.VG.80.DA,1.VG.80.FY and 1.VG.87.DA) performed in day surgery and acute care settings in 9 provinces and 3 territories of Canada. Quebec was not included in the analysis due to different reporting methods. We set a threshold of 60 years of age at which it would be highly unlikely that a patient would undergo arthroscopy to treat anything other than osteoarthritis or degenerative meniscal tear. Trends at national and provincial levels were analyzed using regression. Costs were estimated separately using the 2020 case mix groups (CMG) and comprehensive ambulatory care classification system (CACS) methodologies. Surgeons were classified by decade of graduation from medical school (1989 and prior, 1990-99, 2000-09 and 2010+) and categorized based on the proportion of their patient population who were above (“high proportion inappropriate”) or below (“low proportion inappropriate”) the overall national proportion of ≥ 60 years of age.

The number of knee arthroscopies decreased by 37% (42,785 in 2011-12 to 27,034 in 2019-20) overall and 39% (11,103 in 2011-12 to 6,772 in 2019-20) in those 60 years and older (p 25% of patients 60 years and older. Fifty four percent of surgeons who graduated prior to 1989 were considered high proportion inappropriate, whereas only 30.1% of surgeons who graduated in 2010 or later were considered high proportion inappropriate (p < 0 .0001).

Knee arthroscopy continues to be a common procedure in patients over 60 despite strong evidence for lack of benefit. Lower rates in this population in some provinces are encouraging for potential opportunity for improvement. Efforts at practice change should be targeted at surgeons in practice the longest. Canada spends over $12,000,000 per year on this procedure, decreasing its use could allow these resources to be directed to other areas of orthopaedics that provide higher value care.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has recently identified musculoskeletal care as a major global health issue in the developing world. However, little is known about the quality and trends of orthopaedic research in resource-poor settings. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of orthopaedic research in low-income countries (LIC). The primary objective was to determine the quality and publication parameters of studies performed in LIC. Secondary objectives sought to provide recommendations for successful strategies to implement research endeavors in LIC.

A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching MEDLINE (1966-November 2014), EMBASE and the Cochrane Library to identify peer-reviewed orthopaedic research conducted in LICs. The PRISMA guidelines for performing a systematic review were followed. LIC were defined by the WHO and by the World Bank as countries with gross national income per capita equal or less than 1045US$. Inclusion criteria were (1) studies performed in a LIC, (2) conducted on patients afflicted by an orthopaedic condition, and (3) evaluated either an orthopaedic intervention or outcome. The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) were used to objectively rate the overall methodological quality of each study. Additional data collected from these studies included the publication year, journal demographics, orthopaedic subspecialty and authors' country of origin.

A total of 1,809 articles were screened and 277 studies met our inclusion criteria. Eighty-eight percent of studies conducted in LIC were of lower quality evidence according to the GRADE score and consisted mostly of small case series or case reports. Bangladesh and Nepal were the only two LIC with national journals and produced the highest level of research evidence. Foreign researchers produced over 70% of the studies with no collaboration with local LIC researchers. The most common subspecialties were trauma (42%) and paediatrics (14%). The 3 most frequent countries where the research originated were the United States (42%), United Kingdom (11%), and Canada (8%). The 3 most common locations where research was conducted were Haiti (18%), Afghanistan (14%), and Malawi (7%).

The majority of orthopaedic studies conducted in LIC were of lower quality and performed by foreign researchers with little local collaboration. In order to promote the development of global orthopaedic surgery and research in LIC, we recommend (1) improving the collaboration between researchers in developed and LIC, (2) promoting the teaching of higher-quality and more rigorous research methodology through shared partnerships, (3) improving the capacity of orthopaedic research in developing nations through national peer-reviewed journals, and (4) dedicated subsections in international orthopaedic journals to global healthcare research.