Considerable controversy remains in the literature as to whether hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is the better treatment option for patients with shoulder arthritis. Several cohort studies have compared the outcomes of stemmed hemiarthroplasty with those of stemmed TSA and had inconsistent conclusions as to which procedure is best. However, these studies suggest that stemmed TSA provided better functional outcome. 340 CSRA cases were performed between 1987–2003, 218 Hemiarthroplasty – Humeral Surface Arthroplasty (HSA) and 122 TSA. There was very little difference in the functional outcome and pain in patients with and without a glenoid implant early, as well as, later after surgery. Mean post-operative Constant score for TSA was 85.0% (59.8 points) and for HSA patients 86.8% (62.3 points) with no statistically significant differences (t-test, p=0.4821). A highly significant difference between the overall proportions of revised cases was observed, with (21/122) 17.2% and (6/218) 2.8% of TSA and HSA cases revised, respectively (p< 0.0001). Further, HSA prostheses survive significantly longer than TSA prostheses. The difference between the survival curves was highly significant, both in the earlier post-operative period (Wilcoxon’s test, p=0.0053) as well as the later on (Log-rank test, p=0.0028). Long-term survival of total joint replacement is related to polyethylene wear debris, and therefore its use should be avoided if possible. The difference between our series and those with stemmed prostheses may be due to the fact that with surface replacement the normal anatomy for each patient can be mimicked better than with the stemmed prostheses and there is substantially less place for error as in stem positioning, head sizing or wrong version that may lead to glenoid erosion and less favourable result. Our current practice is and we suggest performing Copeland humeral surface replacement without insertion of glenoid prosthesis.

The purpose of this study is to report the 1 to 5 year results of arthroscopic Rotator Cuff repairs.

Between November 2001 to May 2003, 115 consecutive patients were operated (73 males and 42 females) with arthroscopic repair. 13 patients were lost to follow up, leaving 102 patients available for follow up. Patients were evaluated using the Constant score, satisfaction levels and ultrasound scan to evaluate cuff integrity. Failures were defined as dissatisfied patients and those who had had a re-operation. Re-tear rate was recorded.

The mean follow up time was 23.8 months (range 12–61). Mean age was 57.3 years (range 23–78). 47% had a history of trauma. There were 107 patients (95.5%) with full thickness tears and 5 (4.5%) had partial thickness tears. Of the full thickness tears, 8 (7.6%) were massive in size, 36 (34%) large, 44 (41.5%) medium and 18(17%) small. Isolated Supraspinatus (SSP) tear was recorded in 83.5% and subscapularis tear in 7 %. A combination of SSP tear with infraspinatus and teres minor was found in 9.6%.

86% had Acromioplasty (ASD) with or without an AC joint excision arthroplasty. Two patients had Bankart repairs in addition at the time of cuff repair.

The mean pre op Constant score was 40.9 points (95% CI 37.3 to 44.5), which had improved to 84.8 (CI 82.2 to 86.9) at last follow-up. 78% returned to same work and 82% returned to pre injury leisure activity. There were 20 re-tears (19.6%). eight of the 102 patients were not satisfied. Five of these patients had revision operation.

Arthroscopic cuff repair shows high satisfaction rate (92%) and good functional results with 20% re-tear rate, while offering all the advantages of arthroscopic surgery.

Introduction Pridie and Steadman independently noticed the development of a smooth layer of fibrocartilage when treating exposed subchondral bone in the knee using their techniques of drilling or microfracture respectively. Since 1997, patients presenting to our unit for a Copeland cementless Surface Replacement Arthroplasty (CSRA) with a congruent glenohumeral joint have routinely undergone biological resurfacing of the glenoid using a technique similar to that described by Pridie and Steadman. We present this technique of glenoid resurfacing, the histological and surgical outcomes in a consecutive group of patients.

Methods/Results Between 1987 and 2002, 218 CSRA were performed without replacing the glenoid. From 1997, 133 CSRA have been performed with multiple drilling of the glenoid face with a guide wire through the subchondral bone in to the underlying soft cancellous bone to stimulate bleeding. This causes formation of a fibrocartilaginous layer – biological resurfacing. 9 (6.8%) of the patients with biological resurfacing have subsequently undergone a shoulder arthroscopy for postoperative impingement pain. This allowed us to evaluate the glenoid surface – macroscopically a layer of cartilage was noted in all patients, intraoperative biopsies have confirmed this layer to be fibrocartilage microscopically. In the biological resurfacing group, the mean postoperative Constant score (CS) is 86.9 (age/sex adjusted), with a mean improvement in CS of 71.0. 3 (2.3%) patients have required revision.

Conclusion Our results confirm that glenoid drilling at the time of CSRA leads to the formation of a fibro-cartilaginous layer over the glenoid, with significant improvements in Constant scores and functional outcomes. These results are comparable to other published results for total shoulder replacement with polyethylene resurfacing of the glenoid and better than patients that have undergone stemmed shoulder hemiarthroplasty.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has evolved significantly in the last decade and has become a standard treatment. Satisfactory results of arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) in the treatment of rotator cuff tears have also been reported (1). The aim of this study was to compare the outcome following arthroscopic repair versus decompression alone in patients with small & medium rotator cuff tears (Classification of Post, Silver & Singh (2). There were 114 patients in the ASD group and 96 in the Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair group (RCR). The groups were statistically comparable in terms of patient age & gender. Clinical follow-up was performed at a minimum of 12 months post -operatively (average 36 months). The average Post-op Constant score was 69.8 for the ASD group and 86.4 for the RCR group. The average post-op pain score (S.D) in the ASD group was 10.9 (± 4.3) and in the RCR group was 13.6 (± 3.1). Post operative strength was 7.6 (± 3.6) in the ASD group and 16.7 (± 5.4) in the RCR group.26 patients (22.8%) in the ASD group and 3 (3.3%) of the RCR group required futher surgery. Patient satisfaction (maximum 10 points) was 7.4% in the ASD group and 8.9 (± 1.4) in the RCR. The results of this study support arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Shoulder strength is improved and there is significant reduction in the need for revision surgery.

Arthroscopic Rotator cuff repair is gaining popularity in recent years; however, the results of arthroscopic repairs are yet to be reported. Between November 2001 to May 2003, 115 consecutive patients were operated (73 males and 42 females) with arthroscopic repair. 13 patients were lost to follow up, leaving 102 patients available for follow up.

The mean follow up time was 23.8 months (range 12–61). There were 107 patients (95.5%) with full thickness tears and 5 (4.5%) had partial thickness tears. Of the full thickness tears, 8 (7.6%) were massive in size, 36 (34%) large, 44 (41.5%) medium and 18(17%) small.

Mean age was 57.3 years (range 23–78). 47% had a history of trauma.

Mainly Supraspinatus (SSP) tear was recorded in 83.5% and isolated subscapularis tear in 7%. A combination of SSP tear with infraspinatus and teres minor minor (posterior tear) was found in 9.6%.

86% had Acromioplasty (ASD) with or without an AC joint excision arthroplasty. Two patients had Bankart repairs in addition at the time of cuff repair.

Patients were evaluated using the Constant score, satisfaction levels and ultrasound scan to evaluate cuff integrity. Failures were defined as dissatisfied patients and those who had had a re-operation. Re-tear rate was recorded.

The mean pre op Constant score was 40.9 points (95% CI 37.3 to 44.5), which had improved to 84.8 (CI 82.2 to 86.9) at last follow-up. 78% returned to same work and 82% returned to pre injury leisure activity. There were 20 ultrasound demonstrated re-tears (19.6%). However, the majority of patients with radiological re-tears had good function, pain relief and were satisfied. Eight of the 102 patients were not satisfied. Five of these patients had revision operation.

Arthroscopic cuff repair shows high satisfaction rate (92%) and good functional results while offering all the advantages of arthroscopic surgery.

Introduction: Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) is an established technique for the measurement of perfusion in tissues, which has been applied in animal and human studies. Despite many studies the implications of perfusion and blood flow abnormalities in the rotator cuff (RC) in vivo are not clearly understood. This study aims to assess the blood flow in the normal and diseased RC using Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) technique.

Methods: With Ethics approval and informed consent patients undergoing arthroscopy for impingement or cuff tear (diseased cuff) or for shoulder instability (normal cuff) were recruited. Following diagnostic arthroscopy and bursoscopy measurements of the blood flux in the RC using the LDF were made at 6 points. Five of these were in the cuff over a 4 cm² area from the insertion at the greater tuberosity (A,E – @ Tuberosity level, C-Muscelotendinous junction, B,D – between the two) and one (F) in the deep surface. Diseased RC were subgrouped into mild (B1), moderate (B2) and severe (B3- cuff tear) impingement grades (Copeland-Levy Classification). The arthroscopy, grading, and probe placement were made by the two senior authors. LDF flux (unit of measurement of the perfusion – LDFf) was recorded over 30 seconds at each measurement point. The mean of these readings was calculated.

Results: 56 patients were recruited. 35 Males (62.5%) and 21 Females (37.5%).

336 measurements were recorded.

The observed mean LDFf was 32.8 (27.4–38.1; 95% CI) , 25.4 (22.4–28.5) and 43.1 (37.8–48.4; 95% CI) For Normal, Impingement and Tear cases, respectively (p< 0.0001, One-way ANOVA).

The LDFf was lowest in the Impingement without tear grade (B2) with a statistically significant increase at the edges of a cuff tear.

Conclusion: Preliminary recordings of LDF show changes are in keeping with current knowledge of the pathology. LDFf decreases with advancing impingement, being least affected in the musculotendinous junction. There is a substantial increase in LDFf at the edges of RC tears. This might reflect an attempted reparative response.

The Constant-Murley score has gained wide acceptance for evaluation of shoulder function. The strength component of the Constant score accounts for 25 out of 100 points. It has been criticized for lack of consistency in defined measurement method.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of various variables on the strength component measurement of the Constant score.

Material & Methods We conducted a series of experiments using a digital force gauge (EZ force). We evaluated the effect of strength measurements with 1) patient in sitting & standing positions 2) strength gauge fixed to an immobile platform or hanging free fixed to the floor by the examiners foot 3) patient’s arm in 45 degrees and 90 degrees of abduction 4) plane of elevation in frontal or scapular plane and 5) patient making a fist or keeping the palm open during the test. These experiments were done in groups of 20 patients. We have compared as well this device and the Isobex Myometer.

Results No statistical differences were found between individual measurements with regard to patient’s position (standing-sitting), device setting (Fixed –Hanging), position of the arm in varying degrees of abduction or the plane of elevation. Strength assessment obtained when patient made a fist compared to open palm was found to be higher (p=0.006). The measurements showed good intra-observer reliability.

The readings of the EZ force and the Isobex myometer were comparable.

Conclusions It seems that the shoulder strength measurements as part of the Constant functional score may be performed with the patient sitting or standing, with the arm at varying degrees of abduction and in different planes of elevation without causing any significant deviation in the measurement.

No influence was found as well to the device being either fixed to an immobile platform or fixed to the floor by the examiner’s foot. These make these measurements easy to perform and reproducible using the newly designed digital force gauge (EZ force).

Aim: Despite many studies the implications of perfusion and blood flow abnormalities in the rotator cuff (RC) in vivo are not clearly understood. Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) is an established technique for the measurement of perfusion in tissue, which has been applied in animal and human studies. This study aims to evaluate Laser Doppler Flowmetry (LDF) as a technique for the assessment of blood flow in the normal and diseased RC.

Methods: With Ethics committee approval and informed consent patients undergoing arthroscopy for impingement or cuff tear (diseased cuff) and instability (normal cuff – BO) were recruited. Following diagnostic arthroscopy and bursoscopy measurements of the LDF in the RC tear were made at 6 points. Five of these were in the cuff over a 4 cm. 2 are from the insertion at the greater tuberosity and one in the deep surface.

Diseased RC were sub grouped into mild (B1), moderate (B2) and severe (*B3 – cuff tear) impingement grades (Copeland – Levy Classification). The arthroscopy, grading, and probe placement were made by the senior authors. LDF flux (LDFf) was recorded over 30 seconds at each measurement point. The mean of these readings was then calculated (LDF flux – an arbitrary unit of measurement of the perfusion).

Results: 35 patients were recruited. 210 measurements were recorded, in 6 anatomical locations. The mean LDFf was 34.1 in diseased RC and 55.3 in normal RC (p=0.0002). The mean LDFf was 52.2 in severe (RC tear) impingement and 30.3 in mild and moderate impingement’s (p< 0.0001).

The LDFf was lowest in the moderate grade with a significant increase at the edges of a cuff tear.

Conclusion: Preliminary recording of LDFf show changes are in keeping with current knowledge of the pathology. LDFf decreases with advancing impingement. There is an increase in LDFf at the edges of RC tears. This might reflect a reparative response.

The coraco-acromial ligament (CAL) is partially resected during a subacromial decompression. Clinical studies have reported the regeneration of a structure which appears to be a new CAL. Histological studies of regenerated CAL have demonstrated an abundance of relatively acellular collagen fibrils orientated in the line of a ligament and mechanical testing of the regenerated tissue has properties similar to those of normal CAL. However it is still not clear whether this structure represents scar tissue or truly reformed ligament. Defining the major collagen constituent of this regenerated tissue would allow the distinction between ligament and scar tissue. Therefore the aim of this study was to examine the level of expression of types I and III collagen in regenerated coraco-acromial ligaments (CAL) in humans.

Samples of regenerated CAL were obtained during open surgery for repair of small rotator cuff tears at an average of 24 months (range 14 to 52) after arthroscopic subacromial decompression from 4 men and 3 women with an average age of 58 years (range 44 to 68). A standard protocol radio-active in-situ immunolocalisation technique was used to quantify the ratios of mRNA collagen I to collagen III in the samples.

The results demonstrated that the average ratio of collagen I to collagen III was 6.5. This ratio is similar to the value for normal hip capsule (5–6:1) and human posterior cruciate ligament (8:1).

We conclude that the reformed CALs are ligamentous structures, not scar tissue, and therefore represent truly regenerated ligaments.

Use of shoulder manipulation in the treatment of frozen shoulder (FS) remains controversial. One of the purported risks associated with the procedure is the development of a rotator cuff tear. However the incidence of iatrogenic rotator cuff tears has not been reported. The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of manipulation of the shoulder on the integrity of the rotator cuff.

In a prospective study 20 consecutive patients (21 shoulders) with FS underwent manipulation of the shoulder under anaesthesia (MUA). The average duration of symptoms was 7.3 months (4–18 months). Patients were assessed pre and post manipulation using the Constant score. An ultrasound scan of the rotator cuff was performed before and at 3 weeks after manipulation.

In all patients, pre and post manipulation ultrasound scans showed the rotator cuff to be intact. At 12 weeks after manipulation all patients indicated that they had none or only occasional pain. The mean improvement in motion was 83 degrees (range, 20 – 100°) for flexion, 95 degrees (range, 20 – 120°) for abduction, 58 degrees (range, 0 – 80°) for external rotation and 3 levels of internal rotation (range 3–5 levels). These gains in motion were all significant (p < 0.01). No fractures, dislocations or nerve palsies were observed.

In conclusion manipulation under anaesthesia for treatment of frozen shoulder resulted in significant improvements in shoulder function and pain relief as early as 3 weeks after surgery and was not associated with rotator cuff tears. When performed carefully this procedure is safe and leads to early improvements in pain relief, range of movement and shoulder function.

Purpose: The Subacromial bursa is the largest bursa in the body. In 1934 Codman described the presence of Subacromial plicae, similar to the suprapatellar plicae found in the knee. This anatomical finding was again described by Strizak et al. in 1982. It is recognised that plicae in the knee can cause anterior knee pain with impingement against the patella in young people. We investigate the possibility that a similar situation exists with plicae of the Subacromial bursa. The aims of this study were to document the incidence of bursal plicae seen at bursoscopy during arthroscopic Subacromial decompressions of the shoulder, and to assess whether there is any pattern to the occurrence of these plicae, and the relation to impingement lesions seen at bursoscopy.

Methods: A review of all patients undergoing Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression (ASD) of the shoulder between January 1996 and July 2001.

Results: A total of 2043 ASD procedures were performed in the study period. Of these, the number of plicae found was 130, with an incidence of 6.4%. There was a strong age predilection, with a significantly higher incidence in younger age groups. There was no difference between males and females.

Where a plica was present the impingement lesion seen on the cuff side was significantly greater than the lesion seen on the acromial side (p< 0.0001). This suggests that the impingement might be due to the plica itself.

Conclusions: This study is the first to describe the presence of Subacromial plicae in living subjects and correlates with previous anatomical studies. The younger age predominance correlates with the findings of plicae in the knee. Our findings suggest that Subacromial plica may be a cause of impingement in young patients.