Patients who undergo either primary or revision total ankle replacement (TAR) expect improvements in pain, function and quality of life. The goal of this study was to measure the functional outcome improvements and the difference in patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing primary total ankle replacements compared to revision TAR. A single-center prospective cohort study was undertaken between 2016 and 2022. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. Patients undertook the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MoxFQ) and EQ-5D health quality questionnaires pre-operatively, at 6 months and yearly for life. The Mann Whitney test was undertaken for statistical analysis.Background
Methods
The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of revision ankle replacements, using the Invision implant and impaction allograft for massive talar dome defects following primary ankle replacement failure. Outcomes were assessed in terms of bone graft incorporation; improvement in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs); and survivorship of the revision ankle arthroplasty. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data identified eleven patients who had massive bone cysts and underwent revision of a failed primary total ankle replacement to the Invision revision system, combined with impaction grafting using morselized femoral head allograft. These revisions occurred at a single high volume ankle arthroplasty centre. Computed tomography (CT) scans were used to assess bone graft incorporation and the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and EQ-5D scores were used pre and post operatively to assess PROMs.Objective
Methods
The literature on the outcome of revision total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) remains limited. We aim to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of revision TAA at a high-volume centre in the UK. Retrospective review of 28 patients that underwent 29 revision TAA procedures using INBONE II prosthesis. Demographic, radiological, and patient reported outcome measures data were analysed.Background
Methods
Diabetes is bad, common and diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) once established lead to high rates of amputation. In Nottingham our standard management for infected diabetic foot ulcers is surgical debridement, microbiological sampling, packing with gentamicin beads and targeted antibiotic therapy. Recently we have switched to packing with Stimulan, which is a purified synthetic calcium sulphate compound that can be mixed with patient appropriate antibiotics, is biodegradable and delivers better elution characteristics compared to gentamicin beads. To assess the efficacy of Stimulan compared to Gentamicin beads in the surgical management of infected diabetic foot ulcers.Background
Aim
We report the outcomes of salvage procedures in total ankle replacement (TAR) in a single surgeon series. This study was a retrospective review of patients who had undergone salvage procedures with tibio-talo-calcaneal (TTC) fusion for failed TAR over a period from 1999–2013 in a single centre. In this period, 317 TAR were performed of which 11 have failed necessitating conversion to TTC fusion. Clinical documentation and radiographs were reviewed for cause of failure, type of graft for fusion, time to radiological/clinical union and complications including further surgeries.Introduction:
Methods:
Total ankle replacement is a recognised treatment for disabling end stage ankle arthritis and an alternative to arthrodesis, although results are not yet comparable to other joint replacements. This has stimulated a constant evolution in design of implants and instrumentation. The Nottingham Foot and Ankle Unit used the STAR until 2005, when it switched to Mobility, due to the perceived advantages of less bone resection, improved instrumentation and potentially less polyethylene insert wear. The aim of this study is to report the unit's results and review the different outcomes between the two ankle replacements used. A retrospective analysis of all total ankle replacements carried out by the foot and ankle unit at Nottingham City Hospital between March 1999 and June 2013. Post operative complications, associated reoperations and revisions were recorded. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), Foot Function Index (FFI), European five dimension quality of life scores (EQ-D5) and patient satisfaction was independently assessed at each follow up visit. Other ankle replacements or those performed elsewhere or with less than 12 month follow up were excluded.Introduction:
Methods:
