header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 2 - 2
1 Jan 2019
Boughton O Yan L Ma S Hansen U Giuliani F Cobb J Marrow J Abel R
Full Access

With information about a patient's bone mechanical properties orthopaedic operations could be optimised to reduce intra- and post-operative complications. However, there is currently no reliable method of measuring a patient's bone mechanical properties in vivo. We have previously investigated microindentation, using a 1.5mm diameter spherical indenter tip, and found no correlation between these measurements and compression testing measurements. We hypothesised that by using a larger diameter indenter tip we would closer match bone millimetre-scale mechanical properties.

20 bone samples were taken from 20 patients undergoing hip replacement surgery. The samples were machined from the femoral neck calcar cortical bone into 6×3×3mm parallelepiped specimens, aligned with the osteons along the long axis. The samples were micro-computed tomography (CT) scanned to calculate porosity. Microindentation was performed using a 6mm diameter, sapphire, spherical indenter tip. 12 indentations were performed in a grid and the reduced moduli were calculated using the Oliver-Pharr method. Compression testing was then performed to failure and the apparent elastic modulus was calculated for each sample.

A moderate correlation was found between the indentation reduced moduli and compression testing elastic moduli (r=0.52, r2=0.275, p=0.018). In addition, a moderate correlation was found between the indentation reduced moduli and CT-measured porosity (r=0.5, r2=0.251, p=0.025) and a strong correlation was found between compression testing moduli and porosity (r=0.75, r2=0.568, p<0.001).

Using large-tip spherical microindentation, indentation reduced moduli correlated significantly with compression testing apparent elastic moduli in these 20 cortical bone specimens. Microindentation using a large, spherical indenter tip may predict the mechanical properties of bone at the millimetre length scale and shows promise as a potential future clinical decision aid in surgery.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 9 | Pages 542 - 549
1 Sep 2017
Arnold M Zhao S Ma S Giuliani F Hansen U Cobb JP Abel RL Boughton O

Objectives

Microindentation has the potential to measure the stiffness of an individual patient’s bone. Bone stiffness plays a crucial role in the press-fit stability of orthopaedic implants. Arming surgeons with accurate bone stiffness information may reduce surgical complications including periprosthetic fractures. The question addressed with this systematic review is whether microindentation can accurately measure cortical bone stiffness.

Methods

A systematic review of all English language articles using a keyword search was undertaken using Medline, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. Studies that only used nanoindentation, cancellous bone or animal tissue were excluded.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 31 - 31
1 Oct 2016
Boughton O Zhao S Arnold M Ma S Cobb J Giuliani F Hansen U Abel R
Full Access

The increase in revision joint replacement surgery and fractures of bone around orthopaedic implants may be partly addressed by keeping bone healthy around orthopaedic implants by inserting implants with mechanical properties closer to the patient's bone properties. We do not currently have an accurate way of calculating a patient's bone mechanical properties. We are therefore investigating whether microindentation can accurately calculate bone stiffness.

We received ethical approval to retrieve femoral heads and necks from patients undergoing hip replacement surgery for research. Cortical bone from the medial calcar region of the femoral neck was cut into 3×3×6mm cuboid specimens. Micro-indentation testing was performed in the direction of loading of the bone using a MicroMaterials indenter. The samples were kept hydrated and were not fixed or polished. From the unloading curve after indentation, the elastic modulus was calculated, using the Oliver- Pharr method. To assess which microindentation machine settings most precisely calculate the elastic modulus we varied the loading and unloading rates, load and indenter tip shape.

The most precise results were obtained by using a spherical indenter tip (rather than Berkovich tip), high load (10N), a loading rate of 100 mN/s and unloading rate of 300 mN/s with a pause of 60 seconds at maximum load and multiple load cycles with constant loads. Using these settings the mean elastic modulus over 12 cycles of testing was 13.0 GPa (+/- 2.47).

By using a spherical indenter tip and fast unloading it was possible to get precise apparent modulus values. By unloading as fast as possible the effects of bone viscoelastic properties are minimised. By using a spherical indenter tip, plastic deformation at the tip is minimised (compared to the Berkovich tip). We are performing further standard compression tests on the samples to verify the accuracy of the indentation tests.