In polytrauma patients invasive surgeries can potentiate the posttraumatic systemic inflammation thus increasing the risk of multi organ dysfunction. Therefore, fractures are initially treated by external fixators, which later are replaced by intramedullary nails. We showed that a severe trauma impaired the healing of fractures stabilized by external fixation. Here we studied, whether the conversion to an intramedullary nail increases posttraumatic inflammation and leads to further impairment of healing.

44 rats received a femur osteotomy stabilized by an external fixator (FixEx). Half of the rats underwent a thoracic trauma (TXT) at the same time. After 4 days the fixator was replaced by an intramedullary nail (IMN) in half of the rats of each group. The rats were killed after 40 and 47 days. C5a serum levels were measured 0, 6, 24, and 72h after the 1st as well as the 2nd surgery. The calli were evaluated by three-point-bending test, μCT and histomorphometry.

The TXT significantly increased serum C5a levels after the 2nd surgical intervention. After 40 days the switch from FixEx to IMN significantly decreased bending stiffness in rats with and without TXT. After 47 days flexural rigidity in rats subjected to conversion was significantly decreased compared to rats treated only with a FixEx, particularly in combination with TXT.

This study showed that after a severe trauma the conversion of the fixation could provoke a second hit and contribute to delayed fracture healing.

There is evidence that fracture healing is delayed in severely injured patients. We recently demonstrated that a blunt chest trauma, which induced posttraumatic systemic inflammation, considerably impaired fracture healing in rats. Because the complement anaphylatoxin C5a is an important trigger of systemic inflammation, we tested the hypothesis, whether the impairment of fracture healing observed after a severe trauma resulted from systemically activated complement.

16 male Wistar rats received a thoracic trauma and a femur osteotomy stabilized by an external fixator. Immediately and 12 h after the trauma, half of the animals received a C5aR-antagonist to prevent the C5a-dependent systemic inflammation. Control rats received a nonsense peptide, which does not provoke any biological effect. The animals were killed after 35 days and the calli were analyzed by three point bending testing, μCT and histomorphometry. Statistics: Mann-Whitney U test, level of significance to p<0.05.

The treatment with the C5aR-antagonist increased flexural rigidity significantly by 55%, improved bony bridging of the fracture gap and led to a slightly larger and qualitatively improved callus as evaluated by μCT and histological measurements.

This study shows, that the immunomodulation by a C5aR-antagonist significantly reduced the deleterious effects of a thoracic trauma on fracture healing. C5a could possibly represent a target to prevent delayed bone healing in patients with severe trauma.

Secondary fracture healing processes are strongly influenced by interfragmentary motion. Shear movement is assumed to be more critical than axial movement, however experimental results are controversial. Numerical fracture healing models allow to simulate the fracture healing process with variation of single input parameters and under comparable normalized mechanical conditions. Therefore, a direct comparison of different in vivo scenarios is possible. The aim of this study was to simulate fracture healing under several axial and shear movement scenarios and compare their respective time to heal. We hypothesize that shear movement is always more critical than axial loading. For the presented study, we used a corroborated numerical model for fracture healing in sheep. Numerous variations of the movement amplitude, the fracture gap size and the musculoskeletal loads were simulated for comparable axial compressive and shear load cases. In all simulated cases, axial compressive load had less inhibitory influences on the healing process than shear load. Therefore, shear loading is more critical for the fracture healing outcome in general. Thus, our findings suggest osteosynthesis implants to be optimized to limit shear movements under musculoskeletal loading.

Introduction

The fracture healing outcome is often evaluated via ex vivo testing of the fracture callus. However, there is only a small time window, where the callus stiffness is significantly different, i.e. a delayed fracture healing might be undetected if the time point of sacrifice is improper. The aim of this study was to develop an in vivo monitoring concept, which allows determining the fracture callus stiffness in vivo over the whole healing time in rats.