We present a review of our Specialist Physiotherapy clinic for normal physiological variations of the lower limb (SPNV) clinics, demonstrating them to be clinically effective and cost effective. Children with normal variation of rotational profile and limb angulation present much anxiety to parents and primary care. Providing consultation: to eliminate significant pathology and reassure families, is an important service that a Paediatric Orthopaedic department provides. In our tertiary referral department we have a Specialist Physiotherapy led clinics into which primary care practitioners refer children with whom there are concerns about lower limb development variation. The (SPNV) Clinic was first set up by a Consultant and Senior Physiotherapist in 1999. The aim of the clinic was to reduce the waiting times for incoming referrals but ensuring they are seen in an appropriate environment by an experienced health care professional. Clinics are run by Senior Specialist Physiotherapists, alongside Consultant clinics who are available for advice and direction. This provides security for the physios, the Trust and the patient. Over 15 years there have been more than 4000 patient visits to this clinic. Over 80% were new patient visits. 70% of these visits were discharged in one or two reviews. 97.4% of new referrals were discharged without subsequent review by an orthopaedic surgeon. The most common conditions reviewed were Genu valgum (25%), Genu Varum (16%), intoeing (17%) and flexible flat feet (11%). The clinic has proven to be cost effective as well in drawing in up to £500,000 revenue into the trust in a single year. The department has been approached by other trusts to assist in the implementation of similar clinics. We present this review of the patients, as a template for supporting the work of Paediatric Orthopaedic Departments. This service has facilitated the streamlining of our Consultant Paediatric Orthopaedic clinics.
To assess the success rate of closed reduction after failing Pavlik harness for treatment of DDH. It was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Patient's notes/computerised records were reviewed. Radiological investigations were also reviewed. Microsoft excel used for descriptive stats.Aims:
Methods:
