The primary objective is to compare revision rates for lumbar disc replacement (LDR) and fusion at the same or adjacent levels in Ontario, Canada. The secondary objectives include acute complications during hospitalization and in 30 days, and length of hospital stay.

A population-based cohort study was conducted using health administrative databases including patients undergoing LDR or single level fusion between October 2005 to March 2018. Patients receiving LDR or fusion were identified using physician claims recorded in the Ontario Health Insurance Program database. Additional details of surgical procedure were obtained from the Canadian Institute for Health Information hospital discharge abstract. Primary outcome measured was presence of revision surgery in the lumbar spine defined as operation greater than 30 days from index procedure. Secondary outcomes were immediate/ acute complications within the first 30 days of index operation.

A total of 42,024 patients were included. Mean follow up in the LDR and fusion groups were 2943 and 2301 days, respectively. The rates of revision surgery at the same or adjacent levels were 4.7% in the LDR group and 11.1% in the fusion group (P=.003). Multivariate analysis identified risk factors for revision surgery as being female, hypertension, and lower surgeon volume. More patients in the fusion group had dural tears (p<.001), while the LDR group had more “other” complications (p=.037). The LDR group had a longer mean hospital stay (p=.018).

In this study population, the LDR group had lower rates of revision compared to the fusion group. Caution is needed in concluding its significance due to lack of clinical variables and possible differences in indications between LDR and posterior decompression and fusion.

Demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing as it remains the gold-standard treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. While magnetic-resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the knee are not indicated for diagnosing knee OA, they are commonly ordered prior to the referral to an orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of patients who underwent an MRI in the two years prior to their primary TKA for OA. Secondary outcomes included determining patient and physician associations with increased MRI usage.

This is a population-based cohort study using billing codes in Ontario, Canada. All patients over 40 years-old who underwent a primary TKA between April 1, 2008 and March 31, 2017 were included. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS and included the Cochran-Armitage test for trend of MRI prior to surgery, and predictive multivariable regression model. Significance was set to p<0.05.

There were 172,689 eligible first-time TKA recipients, of which 34,140 (19.8%) received an MRI in the two years prior to their surgery. The majority of these (70.8%) were ordered by primary care physicians, followed by orthopaedic surgeons (22.5%). Patients who received an MRI were younger and had fewer comorbidities than patients who did not (p<0.001). MRI use prior to TKA increased from 15.9% in 2008 to 20.1% in 2017 (p<0.0001).

Despite MRIs rarely being indicated for the work-up of knee OA, nearly one in five patients have an MRI in the two years prior to their TKA. Reducing the use of this prior to TKA may help reduce wait-times for surgery.

Although the impact of sexual difficulties on quality of life in patients with hip osteoarthritis has been documented in previous literature, recent research has shown that surgeons rarely discuss this sensitive topic with patients. The purpose of this study was to develop an educational tool to address common questions that patients may have regarding returning to sexual activity following their total hip arthroplasty (THA).

The study was conducted in two phases. In Phase 1, patients who underwent a THA between 2013–2017 at a single centre were retrospectively identified and sent an anonymous online survey. This survey was aimed at assessing patient-specific concerns regarding whether they would have liked to receive information about returning to sexual activity, what information they would have liked to know and how they would have liked to receive this information. An educational tool was developed based on the findings of Phase 1. In Phase 2, prospective patients who were scheduled for a unilateral or bilateral THA were provided with the educational tool prior to their surgery. A questionnaire was administered to evaluate the effectiveness of this educational tool. Descriptive statistics and chi-squared tests were used for data analysis.

In Phase 1, the overall response rate was 34.7% (n = 58/167). Out of the total respondents, 51.7% indicated an interest in receiving information on when to return to sexual activity following a THA. Patients selected an informational pamphlet as the most desired method of receiving information (p = .044). In Phase 2, the response rate was 54.5% (n = 30/55). Overall, 90% of patients felt that the pamphlet addressed all their concerns, and 93.3% felt they were provided with adequate information on how they could get more information. The pamphlet addressed questions regarding when it was safe to resume sexual activity following a THA, what positions were safe, and the associated risks.

Individuals undergoing a THA are modestly interested in receiving information regarding when to return to sexual activity following their surgery, especially those who are sexually active preoperatively. This educational pamphlet may be useful in routine clinical practice in addressing concerns regarding returning to sexual activity. Understanding patients' goals and expectations for their postoperative course may help surgeons provide a more comprehensive approach to patient care.