Polypropylene (PPE) synthetic mesh is increasingly used in knee arthroplasty surgery to salvage a disrupted extensor mechanism. Despite its clinical success, it is associated with a high rate of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), which is hypothesized to be caused by bacterial biofilm. The purpose of the current study is to describe the progression of PPE-based biofilm formation over time and to determine if intraoperative antiseptic solutions could be used to effectively remove biofilm when treating PJI. Commercially available knotted monofilament PPE mesh1 was cut into 10mm circular shape, immersed in tryptic soy broth (TSB) with methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus and cultured individually in 48-well plates for 10 days to elucidate the biofilm grown on mesh over time. At every 24 hours, a triplicate of samples was retrieved and biofilm on the mesh was dislodged by sonicating at 52 kHz for 15 minutes and quantified by counting colony-forming units (CFUs) after overnight growth. The biofilm growth was also verified using scanning electron microscopy. The effect of saline and antiseptic solutions was verified by exposing 1) 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate2, 2) acetic acid-based mixture3, 3) diluted povidone-iodine (0.35%), 4) undiluted povidone-iodine (10%)4, and 5) 1:1 combination of 10% povidone-iodine & 3% hydrogen peroxide on immature and mature biofilms for 3 minutes, created by culturing with bacteria for 24 hours and 72 hours respectively. All experiments were performed in quintuples and repeated. Antiseptic treatments that produced a three-log reduction in CFU counts compared to controls were considered clinically significant.Aim
Method
Cobalt chrome femoral head has been used widely in total hip arthroplasty and has shown favorable outcome. However, there is still of concern of potential metal toxicity from the wear debris. In the other hand, titanium is well known for its biocompatibility but it is not used in bearing surface of arthroplasty due to its brittleness. Recently, coating of the prosthesis using plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) has shown favorable surface protection. Thus, in this study, we tried to find out whether the PEO coating on the titanium surface would provide surface protection. Five Titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) ball mimicking femoral head was manufactured and was coted using plasma electrolytic oxidation. Wear rate was tested using validated wear tester with 10N compression force at 80rpm. The amount of wear was detected by measuring change of weight after wear test was completed. This was compared with femoral head manufactured with titanium alloy without PEO coating. Toxicity of the debris was also tested using MTT assay with human osteoblast cell line.Introduction
Materials and methods
The correct anteversion of the acetabular cup is critical to achieve optimal outcome after total hip arthroplasty. While number of method has been described to measure the anteversion in plane anteroposterior and lateral radiograph, it is still controversial which method provides best anteversion measurement. While many of the previous studies used CT scan to validate the anteversion measured in plane anteroposterior radiograph, this may cause potential bias as the anteversion measured in CT scan reflects true anteversion while the anteversion measurement methods in plane radiograph are design to measure the planar anteversion. Thus, in the current study, we tried to find the optimal anteversion measurement method free from the previously described bias. Custom made cup model was developed which enables change in anteversion and inclination. Simple radiograph was taken with the cup in 10° to 70° degree of inclination at 10° increments and for each inclination angle, anteversion was corrected from 0° to 30° at 5° increments. The radiograph was taken with the beam directed at the center of the cup (mimicking hip centered anteroposterior radiograph) and at 9cm medial to the cup (mimicking pelvis anteroposterior radiograph). The measurements were done by two orthopaedic surgeons using methods described by 1) Pradhan et al, 2) Lewinak et al, 3) Widmer et al, and 4) Liaw et al. For each measurements, the anteversion were compared with the actual anteversion.Introduction
Material and method
