header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Applied filters
Content I can access

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 104 - 104
1 Jun 2012
Dorr L Pagnano M Trousdale R Thompson M Jamieson M Conditt M
Full Access

Introduction

Recent gains in knowledge reveal that the ideal acetabular cup position is in a narrower range than previously appreciated and that position is likely different based on femoral component anteversion. For that reason more accurate acetabular cup positioning techniques will be important for contemporary THA. It is well known that malalignment of the acetabular component in THA may result in dislocation, reduced range of motion or accelerated wear. Up to 8% of THA patients have cups malaligned in version by more than ±10° outside of the Lewinnek safe zone. This type of malalignment may result in dislocation of the femoral head and instability of the joint within the first year, requiring reoperation. Reported incidences of reoperation are 1-9% depending on surgical skills and technique. In addition, cup malalignment is becoming increasingly important as adoption of hard on hard bearings increases as the success of large head hard on hard bearings seems to be more sensitive to cup positioning. This study reports the accuracy of a haptic robotic system to ream the acetabulum and impact an acetabular cup compared to manual instrumentation.

Methods

Six fresh frozen cadaveric acetabula were CT scanned and three-dimensional templating of the center of rotation, anteversion and inclination of the cup was determined pre-operatively. Half of the specimens were prepared with manual instrumentation while half were prepared with robotic guidance. Haptic and visual feedback were provided through robotics and an associated navigation system to guide reaming and impaction of the cup. The robot constrained the orientation and position of the instruments thus constraining the inclination, anteversion and center of rotation of the reamer, trial and the final cup. Post-operative CT's were used to determine the achieved cup placement and compared to the pre-operative plans.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 254 - 254
1 Jun 2012
Velyvis J Coon T Roche M Kreuzer S Horowitz S Jamieson M Conditt M
Full Access

Introduction

Bicompartmental osteoarthritis involving the medial tibiofemoral and the patellofemoral compartments is often treated with total knee replacement. Improved implants and surgical techniques have led to renewed interest in bicompartmental arthroplasty. This study evaluates the radiographic and early clinical results of bicompartmental arthroplasty with separate unlinked components implanted with the assistance of a robotic surgical arm. In addition, we examine the amount of bone resected using unlinked bicompartmental components compared to total knee replacement. Finally, a retrospective review of total knee cases examines the applicability of this early intervention procedure.

Methods

97 patients received simultaneous but geometrically separate medial tibiofemoral and patellofemoral arthroplasties with implants specifically designed to take advantage of a new bone and tissue sparing implantation technique using haptic robotics. These patients came from four surgeons at four different hospitals. The average follow-up was 9 months. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were taken. ROM, KSS and WOMAC scores were recorded. The patients had an average age of 67 yrs (range: 45-95), BMI of 29 ± 4kg/m2. 47% of the patients were male.

We retrospectively reviewed pre and post operative notes from 406 consecutive TKA patients from a single surgeon. Intraoperative data included the integrity of the three compartments and the ACL.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 92-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 199 - 199
1 Mar 2010
Jamieson M Conditt MA Ismaily SK Noble PC
Full Access

Summary: Intraoperative assessment of knee kinematics during passive flexion and extension of the unloaded knee fails to adequately replicate the kinematics of the loaded knee during a functional activity.

Introduction: Intraoperatively, the alignment and stability of the prosthetic knee are assessed by observing the motion of the articular surfaces during passive flexion/extension. However, this examination is performed via a medial arthrotomy with limited visibility of the articular surfaces and with the joint unloaded. In view of these limitations of the intraoperative exam, this study was conducted to determine whether unloaded knee motion observed on the operating table is predictive of the motion of the knee during a loaded functional activity.

Methods: Six cadaveric knees were tested:

in a simulator which reproduced the manual intraoperative manipulation of the knee during unloaded passive range of motion (PROM), and

in a functional activity simulator which recreated a loaded squatting maneuver.

Standard 14cm midvastus medial arthrotomies were performed on each knee, and the PROM and squatting simulations were repeated. A laser scanner was used in conjunction with CT models to recreate the three-dimensional position of the knee and allow calculation of medial and lateral femoral rollback and tibial rotation.

Results: With PROM, the femoral condyles translated posteriorly (medial: 6.8±2.2mm, lateral: 15.2±1.3mm) and the tibia rotated internally (13.8±2.0°). A similar motion pattern was observed during squatting with slightly less medial (5.2±0.7mm; p=0.57), and lateral (12.8±0.9mm; p=0.06) rollback and rotation (10.7±1.54°; p=0.30). Interestingly, paradoxical anterior translation of the femur (> 2mm) and external rotation of the tibia (> 2°) were observed in 30% of knees during a loaded squat; however, this motion was not predicted by the PROM test.

Discussion: Similar knee kinematics are observed during unloaded flexion/extension and a physiologic squatting activity. However, the unloaded intraoperative test was unable to predict the occurrence of paradoxical motion during functional loading. Therefore, passive intraoperative testing of the knee is of limited value as a predictor of functional knee biomechanics.