Aim: To investigate the outcome of our management of patients with giant cell tumour of the sacrum and draw lessons from this.

Method: Retrospective review of medical records and scans for all patients treated at our unit over the past 20 years with a giant cell tumour (GCT) of the sacrum.

Results: Of 517 patients treated at our unit for GCT over the past 20 years, only 9 (1.7%) had a GCT in the sacrum. 6 were female, 3 male with a mean age of 34 (range 15–52). All but two tumours involved the entire sacrum and there was only one purely distal to S3. The mean size was 10cm and the most common symptom was back or buttock pain. Five had abnormal neurology at diagnosis but only one presented with cauda equina syndrome. The first four patients were treated by curettage alone but two patients had intra-operative cardiac arrests and although both survived all subsequent curettages were preceeded by embolization of the feeding vessels. Of 7 patients who had curettage, 3 developed local recurrence but all were controlled with a combination of further embolisation, surgery or radiotherapy. One patient elected for treatment with radiotherapy and another had excision of the tumour distal to S3. All the patients are alive and only two patients have worse neurology than at presentation, one being impotent and one with stress incontinence. All are mobile and active at a follow up between 2 and 21 years.

Conclusion: GCT of the sacrum can be controlled with conservative surgery rather than sacrectomy. Embolisation and curettage are the preferred first option with radiotherapy as a possible adjunct. Spino-pelvic fusion may be needed if the sacrum collapses.

The authors are not aware of any research comparing computed tomography (CT) and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the scaphoid bone. The primary aim of our study was to investigate the use of longitudinal CT in predicting AVN of the proximal pole of the scaphoid, and subsequent fracture nonunion following internal fixation.

Thirty-two patients operated on by the senior author for scaphoid fracture were included. Preoperative CT scans were independently assessed for deformity, comminution, fracture position, proximal pole sclerosis, and bridging trabeculae. Intra-operative biopsy of the proximal pole was assessed independently by a blinded musculoskeletal histologist. AVN was determined by histology of a proximal pole biopsy, using the criteria described by Ficat. Post-operative CT scan was utilised to determine fracture union.

Preoperative CT features which significantly correlated with AVN were, increased radiodensity of the proximal pole, the absence of any bridging trabeculae comminution, dorsal cortical angle, proximal fracture and age less than 20. Features predictive of subsequent nonunion were fractures of the proximal, increased radiodensity of the proximal pole, and AVN.

Preoperative CT scan findings are significantly correlated with histologically confirmed AVN and fracture union. Preoperative longitudinal CT scan is of significant prognostic value and should be considered to assist in predicting outcome and assessing treatment options.

The purpose of the study was to describe the normal anatomy of glenoid labrum.

20 dry bone scapulas and 19 cadaveric shoulders were examined. Light microscopy was performed on 12 radial slices through the glenoid.

An external capsular circumferential ridge, 7–8mm medial to the glenoid rim marks the attachment of the capsule. A separate internal labral circumferential ridge 4mm central to the glenoid rim marks the interface for the labrum and articular cartilage. A superior-posterior articular facet contains the superior labrum. Two thirds of the long head of biceps arise from the supraglenoid tubercle, the remainder from the labrum.

The superior labrum is concave and is loosely attached to the articular cartilage and glenoid rim. In contrast the anterior-inferior labrum is convex, attaches 4mm central to the glenoid rim and has a strong attachment to articular cartilage and bone.

The anatomy of the superior and anterior-inferior labrum are fundamentally different.

Introduction: Modular tumour prosthetic replacement is especially useful in the region of proximal femur following pathological fractures and failed fixation. The aim of the study was to assess the clinical and functional outcomes following modular tumour prosthesis reconstruction of the proximal femur in 100 consecutive patients with metastatic tumours and to assess its cost effectiveness.

Methods: The study was a retrospective review of 100 consecutive patients who underwent modular tumour prosthetic reconstruction of the proximal femur using the METS prosthesis [Stanmore Implants Worldwide] for metastatic tumours from 2001 to 2008.

Results and conclusion: There were 45 male and 55 female patients. The mean age was 60.2 years. The indications were metastasis [23renal ca, 28 breast ca, 11 ca bronchus, 5 ca prostate and 31 others]. 75 patients presented with pathological fracture or with failed fixation and 25 patients were at a high risk of developing fracture. The mean follow up was 24.6 months [range0–74]. Three patients died within 2 weeks following surgery. Of the 60 patients who were dead 58 did not need revision surgery indicating that the implant provided single definitive treatment which outlived the patient. 1 patient had revision surgery. There were 2 dislocations. 6 patients had deep infections. The implant survival was 98% with revision or amputation as end point. The hospital cost of an endoprosthetic replacement is estimated to be £12,000. This procedure becomes cost effective when compared with no treatment if the patients’ life expectancy is more than 40 days and when compared with internal fixation if the patients’ life expectancy is more than 2 years.

We conclude that METS modular tumour prosthesis for proximal femur provides versatility; low implant related complications and acceptable function lasting the lifetime of the patients with metastatic tumours of the proximal femur providing a cost effective solution.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate the results of a series of cases from a single institution with respect to local disease control and patient survival to determine prognostic factors.

Methods: Electronic patient records were reviewed on all patients with STS between February 1963 and January 2007. 2445 patients had over 30 types of STS. 1639 (67%) had not received any treatment prior to presentation, however, 770 patients (32%) had undergone a previous attempted excision. Survival analyses were done using Kaplan Meier and Cox regression analyses, however, for prognostic factor analysis, only patients presenting without prior treatment were included.

Results: Common diagnoses were liposarcoma (292 patients, 12%), synovial sarcoma (242 patients, 10%) and leiomyosarcoma (239 patients, 10%). Most presented in the thigh (950 patients, 39%), arm (325 patients, 13%) or lower leg (275 patients, 11%) and most were deep to fascia (1581 patients, 74%). The mean size was 10.2cm.

Overall cumulative patient survival was 58% at 5 years and 44% at 10 years. Locally recurrent disease occurred in 350 patients (14%), 204 patients (8%) presented with and 720 patients (30%) subsequently developed metastatic disease.

Prognostic factors for locally recurrent disease were arm tumours (p=0.003, HR=0.3), hip tumours (p=0.01, HR=0.31), thigh tumours (p=0.002, HR=0.52), intralesional margins (p< 0.0001, HR=3.7), high grade tumours (p=0.03, HR=1.8), tumour size 3–6cm (p=0.04, HR=0.54) and tumour size 6–10cm (p=0.03, HR=0.63).

Prognostic factors for patient survival were deep location (p=0.02, HR=1.6), high grade tumours (p< 0.0001, HR=4.7), intermediate grade tumours (p< 0.0001, HR=3.4), surgical margins (p=0.04), age at diagnosis (p< 0.0001, HR=1.02), size of tumour < 3cms (p=0.04, HR=0.29), 3–6cms (p< 0.0001, HR=0.41), 6–10cms (p=0.007, HR=0.63), no locally recurrent disease (p=0.0001, HR=0.59).

Conclusions: Significant prognostic factors have been proven for STS, and marginal margins have not been proven to alter the risk of locally recurrent disease or patient survival.

Aim: To identify the clinical features of patients who present with soft tissue metastases (from a cancer elsewhere) and to identify the source of the cancer.

Method: In a database containing details of 7242 patients referred to our unit for investigation of a soft tissue lump, only 100 of these patients were found to have a soft tissue metastasis (1.4%). We analysed their presenting features and identified the site of the primary malignancy.

Results: The most common presentation of soft tissue metastases was a painless lump The lumps ranging from 2 to 35 cm (mean 8.3cm) with 78% of the lumps located deep to the fascia. The mean age at presentation was 62 and there were equal males and females. 53 had a past history of malignancy. Of these 53, 52 had metastases from the same primary (lung 11, melanoma 10, kidney 9, GI tract 4, breast 6, bladder 4 and others in 9). The other 47 patients had no past history of malignancy and the metastasis was the first presentation of malignancy. The primary sites in these cases were: lung in 19, GI tract 4, kidney 2, melanoma 9, other 3 and unknown (despite investigations) in 10. There was no correlation of the site of the metastases with the primary tumour.

Of the 7242 patients with soft tissue lumps, 476 had a past history of malignancy. Of these patients, only 12% actually had a soft tissue metastasis while 28% had a benign diagnosis, 55% a soft tissue sarcoma and 5% other malignancy.

Conclusion: Patients with a past medical history of malignancy and a new soft tissue lump have a 12% chance of it being a soft tissue metastasis. If a lump proves to be a soft tissue metasasis, the lung is the most common primary site.

The purpose of the study was to describe the normal anatomy of glenoid labrum. Twenty dry bone scapulas and 19 cadaveric shoulders were examined. Light microscopy was performed on 12 radial slices through the glenoid.

An external capsular circumferential ridge, 7–8mm medial to the glenoid rim marks the attachment of the capsule. A separate internal labral circumferential ridge 4mm central to the glenoid rim marks the interface for the labrum and articular cartilage. A superior-posterior articular facet contains the superior labrum. Two thirds of the long head of biceps arise from the supraglenoid tubercle, the remainder from the labrum. The superior labrum is concave and is loosely attached to the articular cartilage and glenoid rim. In contrast the anterior-inferior labrum is convex, attaches 4mm central to the glenoid rim and has a strong attachment to articular cartilage and bone.

The anatomy of the superior and anteroinferior labrum are fundamentally different. Suture anchor repair of the superior labrum should be 7mm medial to the glenoid rim whereas the anterior-inferior labrum should be repaired to the face of the glenoid. By defining the normal anatomy of the superior labrum, pathological tears can be identified.

We reviewed the treatment and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who presented with or developed pathological fracture after biopsy between 1984 and 2004. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The mean age at diagnosis was 20 years (5 – 51). There were 18 males and 14 females. All patients were newly diagnosed and had localized disease at the time of diagnosis. 21 patients presented with pathological fracture while 11 patients developed fracture during the course of chemotherapy. The femur was the most common location in 15 patients.

All the patients had chemotherapy according to the protocol current at the time of treatment. 6 patients had radiotherapy alone while 26 patients underwent surgical excision and reconstruction. Of the patients who had surgery, 7 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Fracture healing was the norm after pre-operative chemotherapy. Surgical margins were wide in 17 patients, marginal in 4 and intralesional in 3 patients.

Local recurrence developed in one patient (3%). Metastases occurred in 12 patients (37%). At the time of review 16 patients were free of disease, 3 were alive with disease and 13 patients had died of disease. The cumulative 5 year metastases free and overall survival in all the patients was 58% and 61 % respectively and similar to patients with Ewing’s sarcoma without fracture treated at our centre. The prognosis of patients who presented with fracture was exactly similar to those who developed fracture in the course of treatment.

We conclude that limb preserving surgery is perfectly safe in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who have associated pathological fracture and survival is not in any way compromised. Survival of patients who present with fracture is similar to those who develop fracture in the course of treatment. The exact role of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients needs to be clarified.

We have investigated whether improvements in design have altered outcome for patients undergoing endoprosthetic replacement of the distal femur following tumour resection.

Survival of the implant and ‘servicing’ procedures has been documented using a prospective database and review of the implant design records and case records.

A total of 335 patients underwent a distal femoral replacement with 162 having a fixed hinge design and 173 a rotating hinge. The median age of the patients was 24 years (range 13–82yrs). With a minimum follow up of 5 years and a maximum of 30 years, 192 patients remain alive with a median follow up of 11 years. The risk of revision for any reason was 17% at 5 years, 33% at 10 years and 58% at 20 years. Aseptic loosening was the most common reason for revision in the fixed hinge knees whilst infection and stem fracture were the most common reason in the rotating hinges. The risk of revision for aseptic loosening in the fixed hinges was 35% at ten years but appears to have been abolished by the use of a the rotating hinge knee with a hydroxyapatite collar. The overall risk of revision for any reason was halved by use of the rotating hinge.

Improvements in design of distal femoral replacements have significantly decreased the risk of revision surgery but infection remains a serious problem for all patients. We believe that a cemented, rotating hinge prosthesis with a hydroxyapatite collar offers the best chance of long term prosthesis survival.

Analysis of the outcome of neurovascular island flap developed to reconstruct volar-oblique fingertip amputations. A comparison of results with the initial study.

Patients were contact telephonically and recalled for review. A subjective questionnaire was filled in and objective clinical measurements taken. The parameters of the original study were reproduced in order to compare results.

We have 12 cases since 2004. 5 Cases were lost to follow up with only clinic notes available. 7 Cases were reviewed. Mean age 20y (4–65y). Good subjective results with regard to cold intolerance, hypersensitivity, numbness, pain and stiffness. Good cosmesis and patient satisfaction. Objective measurements of IPJ stiffness were insignificantly different from the contra lateral side and 2 point discrimination < =5mm. A single flap failure due to sepsis.

It was concluded that this was a safe and reliable method of reconstruction, with a number of advantages over previous methods.

Aim: To identify tumour and treatment factors significant for both local control and survival for patients with chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.

Method: The features of all patients with non metastatic chondrosarcoma of the pelvis treated at a tertiary treatment centre between 1971 and 2001 with more than 2 years of follow-up were analyzed.

Results: There were 106 patients with a median age of 44. There were equal numbers of male and female patients in the group. The median size of the tumours was 12cm. 47 tumours were grade 1, 37 were grade 2 and 22 were grade 3. Treatment involved hindquarter amputation in 33 and excision with or without reconstruction in 73. Clear margins (wide or better) were achieved in 34 cases. The excision was marginal in 30 cases and intralesional or contaminated in 37. Local recurrence arose in 39 patients and was related to adequate margins of excision (p=0.03) and grade (p=0.01). Overall survival was 72% at 5 years, 56% at 10 years and 46% at 15 years. Survival was strongly related to grade (p=0.08) but survival beyond 5 years was most strongly related to the adequacy of the excision margins.

Conclusion: Tumour grade is the most important prognostic factor for chondrosarcoma of the pelvis but the ability to obtain clear margins of excision influences both local control and the prospects for long term survival.

Introduction: The population of the UK is getting older. Patients over the age of 80 (the older old) are increasingly presenting with musculoskeletal tumours that require major surgery. We have investigated the success or otherwise of endoprosthetic replacements after tumour excision in this population.

Methods: We looked at an oncological database to identify patients over the age of 80 who had an endprosthetic replacement after tumour excision. We reviewed the records of all patients over the age of 80 who had an endoprosthetic replacement to assess the oncological and functional outcomes of the procedure.

Results: 17 patients over the age of 80 had an endoprosthesis over the past 10 years. The main indication was for metastatic disease (9 patients) but 6 had primary malignant bone tumours. The most common site was the distal femur in 9 followed by the proximal femur in 5. Most of the patients had associated co-morbidity (12 were ASA 2 or 3). There were no perioperative deaths but 2 patients had early complications with one having a paralytic ileus and one a chest infection. The median survival of the patients was 2 years with death being due to progressive metastases in most. 3 had late complications to do with the prosthesis including one infection in a proximal tibial replacement and a late dislocation at 2 years in a proximal femoral replacement. Two patients developed local recurrence treated by local excision and radiotherapy. There were no amputations or revisions.

Conclusions: Endoprosthetic replacements have a useful role to play in the surgical management of elderly patients. Although they have significant comorbidity most do well. Functional results are less good than in the younger population but most patients regain their independence and are free of pain.

Introduction: This study is a prospective series using a porous-coated cobalt-chromium alloy cup augmented with screw fixation for acetabular revisions.

Methods: Between August 1997 and December 2001, eighty-five consecutive cementless acetabular revisions (81 patients) were performed. The mean age at operation was 64 years. Using the AAOS classification of acetabular defects there was one type I defect, 25 type two defects and 59 type III defects. Eighty-three cases were available for review (98%) with an average follow up of 6 years 6 months (range 3 months – 110 months). Clinical outcome was measured using the Charnley Hip Score and radiological assessment by plain radiographic measurement.

Results: The Charnley Hip Score had improved from a pre-operative average of 7.52 (range 4–11) to the latest score of 14.84 (range 8 – 18). Significant cup migration occurred in only one case, which did not require revision. Sixteen cases demonstrated non-progressive radiolucent lines in one or two Delee and Charnley zones but none extended to all three zones. There were no cases of significant osteolysis. There were five dislocations none requiring re-operation; one revision was carried out for deep infection and one liner exchange at time of stem revision for subsidence. The results of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using revision for all causes as the endpoint was 98.8% (95% confidence limits 0.964 to 1) at seventy-three months.

Discussion: This press fit porous-coated cobalt-chromium alloy cup augmented with screw fixation for acetabular revision surgery produced excellent midterm results. Changes in cup design and material should only be undertaken with consideration of such results.

Introduction: Hip resurfacing is a popular alternative to total hip arthroplasty. It aims to provide more physiological loading of the proximal femur, avoiding stress shielding and associated bone resorption. However, finite element analysis of hip resurfacing systems suggests stress shielding occurs in the femoral neck below the prosthesis and theoretically may lead to femoral neck fracture. Nevertheless, recent DEXA studies indicate femoral bone stock preservation with no evidence of stress shielding. It is not yet known what actually occurs in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to assess whether femoral neck resorption occurs in one particular type of hip resurfacing post operatively and quantify the degree of narrowing.

Methods: Femoral neck resorption of the Cormet 2000 metal-on-metal resurfacing prosthesis (Corin, UK) was assessed by measuring the prosthesis-neck ratio on postoperative radiographs. 39 prostheses (35 patients) were measured on plain AP pelvis radiographs taken immediately and mean 2 years post-operatively. Subsequent follow up radiographs were measured up to maximum 7 years follow up, mean 4.75 years.

Results: There was evidence of neck atrophy in 35/39 hips at an average of 2 years post operation, with the overall average neck narrowing from a ratio of 0.86 to 0.81 at 2 years. Average neck ratios were calculated up to 7 years post resurfacing; 25 hips measured at 3 years average ratio of 0.81, 20 at 4 years ratio 0.8, 25 at 5 years ratio 0.8, 9 at 6 years ratio 0.8, 1 at 7 years ratio 0.81.

Discussion: A degree neck resorption occurs with this resurfacing prosthesis by 2 years, however no further resorption appears to occur beyond this, to a maximum follow up of 7 years. This may indicate that early narrowing is more likely to be due to harmless bone adaption then a progressive absorption jeopardising the femoral neck.

We reviewed the treatment and clinical outcome of 32 consecutive patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who presented with or developed pathological fracture after biopsy between 1984 and 2004. The minimum follow-up was 18 months. The mean age at diagnosis was 20 years (5 – 51). There were 18 males and 14 females. All patients were newly diagnosed and had localized disease at the time of diagnosis. 21 patients presented with pathological fracture while 11 patients developed fracture during the course of chemotherapy. The femur was the most common location in 15 patients.

All the patients had chemotherapy according to the protocol current at the time of treatment. 7 patients had radiotherapy alone while 25 patients underwent surgical excision and reconstruction. Of the patients who had surgery, 7 patients had adjuvant radiotherapy. Fracture healing was the norm after pre-operative chemotherapy. Surgical margins were wide in 17 patients, marginal in 4 and intralesional in 3 patients.

Local recurrence developed in one patient (3%). Metastases occurred in 12 patients (37%). At the time of review 16 patients were free of disease, 3 were alive with disease and 13 patients had died of disease. The cumulative 5 year metastases free and overall survival in all the patients was 58% and 61 % respectively and similar to patients with Ewing’s sarcoma without fracture treated at our centre. The prognosis of patients who presented with fracture was exactly similar to those who developed fracture in the course of treatment.

We conclude that limb preserving surgery is perfectly safe in patients with Ewing’s sarcoma who have associated pathological fracture and survival is not in any way compromised. Survival of patients who present with fracture is similar to those who develop fracture in the course of treatment. The exact role of adjuvant radiotherapy in these patients needs to be clarified.

Synovial sarcoma is a morphologically well-defined neoplasm that most commonly occurs in soft tissue accounting for 5% to 10 % of all soft tissue sarcomas. We reviewed 156 patients with synovial sarcoma of soft tissues treated at a supra-regional centre to determine survival and prognostic factors.

There were 77men and 79 women with mean age at presentation of 38 years (3 to 84). Follow-up periods ranged from 3 to 494 months (median 43 months). Tumor was located in lower extremities in 111patients, upper extremities in 34 patients, and trunk and pelvis in 11 patients. Overall survival was 66% at 5 years and 48% at 10 years. The 5 and 10 year survival for the 23 patients who had metastases at the time of diagnosis was 13% and 0% respectively compared to 75% and 54% for those without metastases at diagnosis. Local recurrence occurred in 18 patients (13%). The significant prognostic factors for survival included presence of metastases at diagnosis and development of local recurrence. Tumour size and depth, age of patients and use of chemotherapy did not significantly influence survival.

We conclude that the clinical factors which influence survival of patients with synovial sarcoma are different from those of soft tissue sarcomas in general. Biological factors may better predict prognostic survival than the usual clinical factors.

Purpose: To study the results of treatment of symptomatic non-union with endoprosthesis at the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital

Methods: Between 1987 & 2005, 17patients were treated with massive endoprosthesis for non-union. We performed a retrospective review of these case notes

Results: Mean age at diagnosis was 63years (range 36–86). Location of non-union was distal femur in 9, proximal femur in 4, proximal humerus in 2, proximal tibia in 1, distal humerus in 1. The majority of the patients had received prior multiple operations before endoprosthetic surgery.

Four patients had obvious infection confirmed by histology and/or microbiology prior to surgery. Endoprosthetic Reconstruction was performed as a 1 stage procedure in 13 and as a 2 stage in 4.

Complications occurred in 5 patients. These included recurrence of infection in 1, persistent pain in 1, aseptic loosening in 1, periprosthetic fracture in 1 and a non ST myocardial infarction in 1. At the last follow-up, (mean 5years, range 1–18years) majority of patients achieved good range of motion and good mobility.

Conclusion: We conclude that endoprosthetic replacement is a reasonable option for treatment of end-stage non-union in carefully selected patients. Adequate mobility and function can be achieved in majority of patients following such treatment

Aim: To identify patient, tumour or treatment factors that influence outcome in patients with radiation induced sarcoma of bone.

Method: A retrospective review of an oncology database supplemented by referral back to original records.

Results: We identified 42 patients who presented to our Unit over a 25 year period with a new sarcoma of bone following previous radiotherapy. The age of the patients at presentation ranged from 10 to 84 years of age (mean: 17 years) and the time interval from previous radiotherapy ranged from 4 to 50 years (median: 14 yrs; mean: 17 years). The median dose of radiotherapy given had been 50 Gy but there was no correlation of radiation dose with time to development of sarcoma. The pelvis was the most common site for development of sarcoma (14 cases) but breast cancer was the most common primary tumour (8 cases). 9 of the patients had metastases at the time of diagnosis of the sarcoma. Osteosacoma was the most common diagnosis (30). Treatment was by surgery and chemotherapy when indicated and 30 of the patients had treatment with curative intent. The survival rate was 41% at 5 years for those treated with curative intent but in those treated palliatively median survival was only 6 months and all had died by one year. The only factor found to be significant for survival was the ability to completely resect the tumour, thus limb sarcomas had a better prognosis (66% survival at 5 years) than central ones (12%)(p=0.009).

Conclusion: Radiation induced sarcoma is a rare complication of radiotherapy. Both surgical and oncological treatment is likely to be compromised by previous treatment the patient has received. Despite this 40% of patients will survive more than 5 years with aggressive modern treatment.

Purpose of the study: To analyze survival and prognostic factors in a series of patients treated for chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.

Material and methods: The series included 106 patients (53 women and 53 men) treated for non-metastatic chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. Minimum follow-up was two years. Mean age at diagnosis was 44 years. Tumors were grade 1 (n=47), grade 2 (n=37), grade 3 (n=22). Conservative surgery was performed in 73 patients (resection with or without reconstruction) and interilio-abdominal disarticulation for 33.

Results: Resection margins were sufficient for 34 patients (wide or radical resection), marginal for 35, and intratumoral or malignant for 37. Local recurrence was noted in 39 patients (37%). Prognostic factors affecting local recurrence were: quality of resection (p=0.03), grade (p=0.01). Overall survival at 5, 10 and 15 years were 72, 56, and 46% respectively. Survival was strongly correlated with grade (p=0.08) and survival after five years was also correlated with resection margins.

Conclusions: In this series, tumor grade was the most important prognostic factor for patients with chondrosarcoma of the pelvis but achieving satisfactory resection with wide margins also has a significant effect on prognosis for local recurrence and long-term survival.

Background: Limb preserving surgery in patients with tumours involving the whole femur present a formidable challenge.

Results: We present our experience of treating such patients with total femur endoprostheses over the last 30 years (1975 to 2005). There were twenty six consecutive patients including 14 males and 12 females. Average age was 40 years (14 – 82 years) at the time of surgery. Eleven patients were still alive of which nine were free of disease at the time of review. The mean follow-up was 57 months (3 to 348). Using Kaplan Meier estimates, the long-term patient survival at 10 years was 37%. The survival of patients with primary localised tumour was 50% at 10 years.

Revision of the prostheses was necessary in two patients at 110 and 274 months after surgery because of recurrent dislocation in one and aseptic loosening of the acetabular cup and tibial stem in the other. Amputation was necessary in two patients, one due to deep infection and the other due to local recurrence. The long-term limb survival being 92% at 10 years. Nine patients who were alive with no evidence of disease were assessed for function of the salvaged limbs using the musculoskeletal tumour society (MSTS) rating system. The mean functional score was 72%.

Conclusion: We conclude that total femur endoprosthetic replacement offers an excellent method of limb reconstruction following excision of the whole femur either for primary or metastatic tumours. However, patients survival after such operation is poor due to disease related factors.