Introduction

Since the introduction of 3rd generation Metal-on-Metal-Hip-Resurfacing-Arthroplasty (MoMHRA), thousands of such prostheses have been implanted worldwide in younger patients with end-stage hip osteoarthritis. However, no independent centre has reported their medium-to-long term outcome. The aim of this study is to report the ten year survival and outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR), the most commonly used MoMHRA worldwide.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is an important cause of pain and morbidity. The mechanisms and pathogenesis of OA'sdevelopment remain unknown. Minor acetabular dysplasia and subtle variations in proximal femoral morphology are increasingly being recognized as factors that potentially compromise the joint biomechanically and lead to OA. Previous studies have shown that risk of hip OA increased as the femoral head to femoral neck ratio (HNR) decreased. Previous work has described the evolutionary change in inferior femoral neck trabecular density and geometry associated with upright stance, but no study has highlighted the evolutionary change in HNR. The aim of this study was to examine evolutionary evidence that the hominin bipedal stance has lead to alterations in HNR that would predispose humans to hip OA.

Introduction

Tribological studies have described a characteristic wear pattern of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings (MoMHRAs) with a run-in period followed by a ‘bedding-in’ phase minimising wear or by an increasing wear patch with edge loading. The use of metal ions as surrogate markers of in-vivo wear is now recommended as a screening tool for the performance of MoMHRAs. The aims of this retrospective, single-surgeon study were to measure ion levels in unilateral MoMHRAs at different stages during the steady-state in order to study the evolution of wear and factors affecting it.

INTRODUCTION

Studies have suggested that there is a reduction in head-neck-ratio (HNR) associated with MoMHRA. A reduction in HNR at operation would decrease range of movement and increase impingement risk. Impingement could lead to 20 edge loading, increasing wear. Serum ion levels of Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co) are surrogate markers of wear. Although acetabular component orientation has been shown to contribute to wear and PT development, the role of a decrease in HNR has only been highlighted in PT development. This study aimed to measure changes in HNR that occur at resurfacing and determine any gender- and component size-specific differences. In addition it aimed to determine whether changes in HNR could be associated with increased wear.

INTRODUCTION

Although simulation studies have shown superior wear properties of metal-on-metal articulations, increased concern exists regarding the excess in-vivo wear of a small number of Metal-on-Metal-Hip-Resurfacing (MoMHRA) implants. Serum ion levels of Chromium (Cr) and Cobalt (Co) are surrogate markers of wear. Risk factors associated with increased wear include female gender, small components, dysplasia, cup orientation outside safe zone and femoral head downsize during surgery with an associated decrease in Head-Neck-Ratio (HNR). However, these factors are interlinked. This study aims to identify the factors that are most important for subsequent wear of MoMHRA, by performing a multivariate analysis.

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of hard-on-hard bearings and the consequences of increased wear due to edge-loading have renewed interest in the importance of acetabular component orientation for implant survival and functional outcome following hip arthroplasty. Some studies have shown increased dislocation risk when the cup is mal-oriented which has led to the identification of a safe-zone1. The aims of this prospective, multi-centered study of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) were to: 1. Identify factors that influence cup orientation and 2. Describe the effect of cup orientation on clinical outcome.

A femoral head/neck ratio (HNR) of less than 1.27 is associated with an increased risk of arthritis. The aim of this study was to establish whether there is evolutionary evidence that the homonin, bipedal stance has led to alterations in HNR that predispose humans to osteoarthritis (OA).

Specimens provided by The Natural History Museums of London, Oxford and the Department of Zoology, University of Oxford were grouped according to gait pattern, HAKF (Hip and knee flexed), Arboreal (ability to stand with hip and knee joints extended) and homonin/bi-pedal. Specimens included those from Devonion, Triassic, Jurrasic, Cretaceous, Miocene, Paleolithic, Pleistocene periods to modern day. Three-dimensional skeletal geometries were segmented using CT images and HNR measurements were taken from coronal views. These were compared with the HNR of 119 asymptomatic human volunteers and 210 patients that had a hip joint replacement for primary OA.

Species of the HAKF group had the smallest HNR (1.10, SD:0.09). Species of the Arboreal group had significantly higher HNR (1.63, SD:0.15) in comparison to the Bipedal group (1.41, SD:0.04) (p=0.006), Human (1.33, SD:0.08) and the OA group (1.3, SD:0.09).

The range of movement associated with arboreal habitat caused an associated change in HNR. This study would suggest that the HNR peaked in the Miocene period with species that ambulated on both ground and trees. More recent homonin gait appears to have developed a smaller HNR and humans have the smallest amongst their close ancestors. Evolutionary theory would suggest that modern environmental pressures might pre-dispose future hominin evolution to OA, secondary to a further reduction in HNR.

Introduction: Metal-on-metal-hip-resurfacing-arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has been associated with the development of inflammatory pseudotumours(IP), especially in females. IPs have been linked to wear debris, which can be related to metal-ion blood levels. Acetabular component position has been shown to influence wear. We have identified an optimum component orientation minimising IP risk around an inclination/anteversion of 40°/20°±10°. Our aim was to see if this optimal position results in lower metal ions and to identify the boundary of an optimal placement zone for low wear.

Methods: A cohort of 104 patients(60M:44F) with unilateral MoMHRA was studied. Blood tests were obtained at a mean follow up of 3.9 years and serum Co/Cr levels were measured(ICPMS). High metal ion concentrations were defined as Co> 4.1ppb and Cr> 5.2ppb. Radiographic cup inclination/anteversion were measured using EBRA. The differences in ion levels between different orientation zones were investigated. Three orientation zones were defined centered on 40°/20°: Z1-within ±5°, Z2-outside ±5°/within ±10° and Z3-within ±10°.

Results: There was a wide range of cup placements. Females had significantly (p< 0.001) smaller components(mean:51, 44–60) than males(mean: 56, 52–64). Cr levels, but not Co, were higher in females(p=0.002) and those with small femoral components(< 50mm, p =0.03). Patients with cups within Z1 (n=13) had significantly lower Co(p=0.005) and Cr(p=0.001). Males with cups within Z3(n=27) had lower ion levels in comparison to those outside, which were significantly lower for Co(p=0.049) but not Cr(p=0.084). Females had similar ion levels within and out of Z3(Cr/Co: p=0.83/0.84). Co levels were significantly lower in Z1(n=13) in comparison to Z2(n=33)(p=0.048) but Cr levels were not different (p=0.06).

Discussion: MoMHRA cups placed within ±5° of the optimum(40°/20°) had significantly lower metal ions indicating lower wear within this narrow zone. This safe zone, could extend to ±10° for males only. The narrower safe zone coupled with smaller components implanted are possible factors contributing to the increased IP incidence seen in females.

Introduction: Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty(MoMHRA) is an alternative option to THR in the treatment of young adults with OA. A recognised MoMHRA complication is the development of an inflammatory pseudotumour(IP). Diagnosis is made with the aid of US and/or MRI. To-date, no radiographic indication of the presence of IP has been identified. Neck thinning is a recognised phenomenon in MoMHRA hips not associated with any adverse clinical events. Its pathogenesis is considered multi-factorial. Our aim was to establish whether excessive neck narrowing is associated with the presence of a pseudotumour.

Methods: Twenty-seven hips (26 patients) with IP confirmed clinically, radiologically, intra-operatively and histologically were matched for sex, age, pre-operative diagnosis, component size and follow-up with an asymptomatic MoMHRA cohort (Control n=60). For all patients, prosthesis-neck-ratio(PNR) was measured on plain AP pelvic radiographs post-operatively and at follow-up as previously described and validated.

Results: All IP patients (4M:23F) and all (12M:48F) but two controls had a posterior approach at the time of MoMHRA. Post-operatively, there was no difference in the PNR between the two groups (p=0.19). At an average follow up of 3.5 years (range:0.7–8.3), IP patients(mean 1.26, 1.10–1.79) had a significantly higher (p< 0.0001) PNR in comparison to their controls(mean 1.14, 1.03–1.35). Greater neck narrowing occurred in both genders. IP necks had narrowed by an average of 8% (range:3–23). The degree of neck narrowing was correlated with length of survival of implant (p=0.001).

Discussion: This study shows a strong association between IP and neck narrowing. Processes such as impingement and increased wear are considered to be involved in the pathogenesis of both IP and neck narrowing. Furthermore, the presence of an IP, could lead to altered vascularity via a mass effect and further contribute to neck narrowing. Neck narrowing in symptomatic MOMHRA patients should alert surgeons of the possible presence of IP.

Introduction: The development of Inflammatory Pseudotumour (IP) is a recognised complication following Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA), thought to occur secondary to wear and elevated ion levels. Studies have shown that acetabular component orientation influences the wear of metal-on-metal hip replacement bearings. The aims of this study were to investigate the significance of cup orientation in the development of IP, and to identify a ‘safe-zone’ for cup placement with lower-risk for IP development.

Methods: Twenty six patients (n=27 hips) with IP confirmed radiologically, intra-operatively and histologically were matched for sex, age, pre-operative diagnosis, component size and follow-up with a cohort of asymptomatic MoMHRA patients (Control n=58). Radiographic acetabular anteversion and inclination were measured using EBRA. We calculated the distance in degree space of each acetabular component from the optimum position of 40° inclination and 20° anteversion, recommended by the designers, and thus compared acetabular component position between the two groups. Three different zones were tested as possibly optimum for acetabular placement. These were Lewinneck’s Zone (LZ) (inclination/anteversion; 30–50°/5–25°), and two zones defined by ±5° (Zone 1) or ± 10° (Zone 2) about the suggested target of 40°/20°. An optimal placement zone was determined based on a significant difference in IP incidence between components in the zone versus those outside.

Results: There was a wide range in cup orientations; mean inclination and anteversion were similar in the two groups: IP 47.5° (10.1°–80.6°)/14.1° (4.1°–33.6°) Vs Control 46.1° (28.8°–59.8°)/15.6° (4.3°–32.9°). Acetabular components in the IP group were significantly further away from the optimum position of 40°/20° in comparison to the controls (p=0.023). There was no difference in IP incidence between cups positioned within (IP:13/27, Control:35/58) or out of LZ (p=0.09) and within (IP: 2/27, Control: 10/58) or out of Zone 1 (p=0.156). Cups placed in Zone 2 (IP:6/27, Control:27/58) had significantly lower IP incidence versus those outside this zone (p=0.01). The odd’s ratio of developing IP when the cup is positioned out-of Zone 2 was 3.7.

Discussion: This study highlights the importance of ace-tabular component orientation in IP development. On the whole, patients with pseudotumour had acetabular components that were further away from the optimum position in comparison to the controls. However, a small number of IP patients had well-placed components implying that additional factors, possibly patient and/or gender specific, are involved in the development of pseudotumour. Furthermore, we defined an optimum, ‘safe-zone’ of ±10° around the cup position of 40°/20°. Patients with acetabular components outside this safe zone have an increased risk of IP development.

Introduction: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity as an alternative to THR for younger patients with osteoarthritis. A growing concern has been the association of MoMHRA with the development of inflammatory pseudotumours (IP), especially in women. These have been linked to metal-on-metal wear, which can be related to metal ion concentrations. Elevated metal wear debris levels may result from impingement, rim contact and edge loading. Head-neck ratio (HNR) is a predetermining factor for range of movement and impingement. Neck thinning is a recognised phenomenon post-MoMHRA and we have found an association of IP with increased neck thinning based on a case control study. Our aims were to identify HNR changes a hip undergoes when resurfaced and at follow up; and whether greater neck thinning at follow-up could be associated with the presence of elevated metal ions.

Methods: A cohort of 91 patients (57M:34F) with unilateral MoMHRAs were included in this study. Blood tests were obtained at a mean follow up of 3.9 years (range 1.7–7 years) and serum (Co:Cr) ion levels were measured (ICPMS). High metal ion concentrations were defined as Co> 4.1ppb and Cr> 5.2ppb. For all patients, head-neck ratio (HNR) was measured on plain anterio-posterior pelvic radiographs pre-operatively, immediately post-operatively and at follow-up.

Results: Female patients had significantly bigger HNR pre-op (mean=1.35, range:1.22–1.64) compared to males(mean=1.22, range:1.05–1.38) (p< 0.01). Immediately post-op, female HNRs (mean: 1.26, range: 1.14–1.34) were not different to male patients(mean=1.24, range=1.11–1.38) (p=0.11). At follow-up HNR was once again significantly bigger (p< 0.01) in females (mean=1.35, range: 1.21–1.49), compare to males (mean=1.27, range:1.11–1.38). HNR alterations with operation (p=0.00) and at follow-up (p< 0.01) were significantly bigger in female patients. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between high ion levels and HNR change at follow-up for both Co (p=0.02) and Cr (p< 0.01).

Conclusion: This study identified gender-specific changes in HNR that resurfaced hips undergo, not previously documented. Female hips have greater HNR pre-operatively, compared to male hips, and appear to be biomechanically disadvantaged when resurfaced. A decrease in HNR with resurfacing could result in impingement and lead to processes, known to be more prevalent in females, such as neck thinning, increased wear and IP development. In addition, we highlight a correlation between high ion levels and greater neck thinning at follow-up. Increased neck thinning in symptomatic MoMHRA hips could be secondary to increased wear and should be investigated further radiologically for the presence of IP.

Introduction: Metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has become an alternative option to THR in the treatment of young adults with OA. A recognised MoMHRA complication is the development of an inflammatory pseudotumour (IP). IPs can be cystic (predominantly posterio-laterally located), solid (mostly anteriorly located) or mixed in nature. Diagnosis is made with the aid of US and/or MRI. To-date, no radiographic aid in the diagnosis of IP has been identified. Neck thinning is a recognised phenomenon following MoMHRA, occurring in up to 90% of resurfaced hips, which has not been associated with any adverse clinical events. Its pathogenesis is considered multi-factorial secondary to stress shielding, impingement, pressure effect on cancellous femoral neck, bone necrosis secondary to femoral preparation and altered vascularity/AVN. Our aim was to establish whether neck thinning is associated with the presence of a pseudotumour.

Methods: Thirty-one hips (30 patients) with IP confirmed clinically, radiologically, intra-operatively and histologically were matched for sex, age, pre-operative diagnosis, component size and follow-up with an asymptomatic MoMHRA cohort without pseudotumour (Control n=60). Radiological and operative findings at the time of revision of all IP patients were reviewed regarding location of pseudotumour; 4 different locations were defined: anteriorly-extending, posteriorly-extending, anteriorly & posteriorly-extending and within joint only. For all patients, prosthesis-neck ratio (PNR) at follow-up was measured on plain AP pelvic radiographs as previously described and validated.

Results: All IP patients (6M:24F) and all (12M:48F) but two controls had a posterior approach at the time of MoMHRA. Mean femoral component size was 46 mm for both groups. At an average follow up of 3.5 years (0.7–8.3), IP patients (mean 1.26, 1.10–1.79) had a significantly higher (p< 0.0001) PNR in comparison to their controls (mean 1.14, 1.03–1.35). Greater neck thinning had occurred in both IP-males (p< 0.001) and IP-females (p=0.002) in comparison to their controls. Location of IP and hence nature did not appear to have an effect on the degree of neck thinning.

Discussion: This study shows that IP patients had significantly narrower femoral necks at follow-up. Processes, such as impingement and increased wear that are thought to contribute to the process of neck narrowing are also thought to be factors in IP development. Furthermore, the presence of an IP, could lead to altered vascularity via a mass effect and further contribute to neck narrowing. Interestingly, nature of IP did not have a significantly affect PNR. Although one cannot be certain whether neck narrowing is a consequence or a contributing factor for IP development, their association is significant. Surgeons should consider the possibility of pseudotumour in symptomatic MoMHRA patients with neck narrowing.

Introduction: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity as an alternative to THR for younger patients with osteoarthritis. A growing concern has been the association of MoMHRA with the development of inflammatory pseudotumours (IP), especially in women. These have been linked to metal-on-metal wear, which can be related to metal ion concentrations. Although cup orientation has been shown to influence wear, the optimum cup position has not been clearly defined. We have identified an optimal cup orientation to minimise IP risk, based on a case controlled study, for inclination/anteversion within ±10° of 40°/20°. Our aim was to see if this optimal position results in lower metal ions, and to identify the boundary of an optimal placement zone for low wear.

Methods: A cohort of 104 patients (60M: 44F) with unilateral MoMHRA was included in this study. Blood tests were obtained at a mean follow up of 3.9 years (range 1.7–7 years) and serum Co and Cr ion levels were measured (ICPMS). High metal ion concentrations were defined as Co> 4.1ppb and Cr> 5.2ppb. Radiographic cup inclination and anteversion were measured using EBRA. The differences in ion levels between different cup orientation zones were investigated. Three orientation zones were defined centered on the target orientation of 40°/20°: Z1 within ±5°, Z2 outside ±5°/within ±10° and Z3: within ±10°.

Results: There was a wide range of cup placements; mean inclination/anteversion were 46.3°(21.5°–64.6°)/15°(2.7°–35.6°). Cr levels, but not Co, were higher in female patients (p=0.002) and those with small femoral components (< 50mm, p =0.03).

For the whole cohort, there was no significant difference in ion levels (Cr: p=0.092. Co=0.075) between cups positioned within Z3 (n=58) versus those outside (n=46 mean). Male patients with cups within Z3 (n=27) had lower ion levels in comparison to those outside Z3, which were significantly lower for Co (p=0.049) but not Cr (p=0.084). Female patients had similar levels within and out of Z3 for both ions (Cr: p=0.83, Co: p=0.84). However, patients with cups within Z1 (n=13) had significantly lower Co (p=0.005) and Cr (p=0.001) than those outside Z1 (n=95). Interestingly, Co levels were significantly lower in Z1 (n=13) in comparison to Z2 (n=33) (p=0.048) but Cr levels were not different (p=0.06).

Discussion: MoMHRA cups placed with ±5° of the ideal position of 40°/20°gave rise to significantly lower metal ions indicating lower wear within this narrow zone, in both sexes. This safe zone, could be extended to ±10° for male patients only. Gender specific factors, such as pelvic anatomy and joint flexibility, could be responsible for the narrower ‘safe’ zone seen in females. The narrower safe zone coupled with smaller components implanted are factors contributing to higher ion levels and hence the increased incidence of IP seen in females.

Metal on Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity due to its perceived advantages of bone conservation and relative ease of revision to a conventional THR if it fails. Known MoMHRA-associated complications include femoral neck fracture, avascular necrosis/collapse of the femoral head/neck, aseptic loosening and soft tissue responses such as ALVAL and pseudotumours. This study’s aim was to assess the functional outcome of failed MoMHRA revised to THR and compare it with a matched cohort of primary THRs.

Method: We have revised 53 MoMHRA cases to THR; the reasons for revision were femoral neck fracture (Fracture Group, n=21), soft tissue reaction (Pseudotumour Group, n=16) and other causes (Other Group, n=16: loosening, AVN and infection). Average followup was 2.9 years. These MoMHRA revisions were compared with 103 matched controls from a primary THR cohort; matched for age, gender and length of followup. We compared, using the MannWhitney U test, operative time (OT, measured in minutes), and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) between the revised MoMHRA groups and their individual controls. We also compared, using the Kruskal Wallis test, UCLA Activity Score in the revised MoMHRA groups.

Results: There were no differences between the Fracture Group (mean OT 99.6, SD: 30.4; mean OHS 19.8, SD:9.2) and its controls (mean OT 95.9, SD: 31.8; mean OHS 17.3, SD: 7.5) nor between the Other Group (mean OT 129.4, SD: 36.7; mean OHS 22.2, SD: 9.4) and its controls (mean OT 104.4, SD: 39.2; mean OHS 20.3, SD: 10.1) in terms of OT and OHS. The Pseudotumour Group had significantly longer OT (mean 161.6, SD: 24.5, p< 0.001) and worse outcome (mean OHS 39.1, SD: 9.3, p< 0.001) than its controls (mean OT 113.1, SD: 51.7; mean OHS 20.0, SD: 9.2). In the Fracture Group, there were 3 infections requiring revisions. For the Pseudotumour Group, there were 3 recurrent dislocations, 1 femoral artery stenosis and 3 femoral nerve palsies. In the Other Group, there were 2 periprosthetic fractures. There was significant difference (p< 0.001) in UCLA scores between the MoMHRA groups. The Pseudotumour Group had the lowest mean UCLA score of 3.8 (SD: 1.89). The Fracture Group (mean: 7.0, S.D. 2.0) and the Other Group (mean: 6.7, S.D. 2.1) had similar UCLA scores.

Discussion: The results demonstrate that outcome after revision of MoMHRA is dependent upon the indication for revision. Patients revised for soft tissue reactions had significantly worse outcome. Patients with soft tissue reactions are more likely to experience complications and require further surgical intervention. The pseudotumour associated revisions were associated with a significantly prolonged OT. The overall complication rate for the study groups was quite high, with 11 (21%) revised MoMHRA cases experiencing a complication. The Pseudotumour Group had a higher complication rate (37%).

Introduction: Metal on metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty (MoMHRA) has gained popularity due to its perceived advantages of bone conservation and relative ease of revision to a conventional THR if it fails. This retrospective study is aimed at assessing the functional outcome of failed MoMHRA revised to THR and comparing it with a matched cohort of primary THRs.

Method: Since 1999 we have revised 53 MoMHRA to THR. The reasons for revision were femoral neck fracture (Group A, n=21), pseudotumour (Group B, n=16) and other causes (Group C, n=16: loosening, avascular necrosis and infection). Average follow-up was 3 years months (1.2–7.3). These revisions were compared with 106 primary THRs which were age, gender and follow-up matched with the revision group in a ratio of 2:1.

Results: The mean Oxford Hip Score (OHS) was 20.1 (12–51) for group A, 39.1 (14– 56) for group B, 22.8 (12–39) for group C and 17.8 (12–45) for primary THR group. In group A, there were three infections requiring further revisions. In group B, there were three recurrent dislocations, three patients with femoral nerve palsy and one femoral artery stenosis. In group C, there were no complications. The differences in clinical and functional outcome between group B and the remaining groups as well as the difference in the outcome between group B and control group were statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: THR for failed MoMHRA was associated with significantly more complications, operation time and need for blood transfusion for the pseudotumour group. In addition, the revisions secondary to pseudotumour also had significantly worse functional outcome when compared to other MoMHRA revisions or primary THR.