This retrospective clinical study describes our experience of the use of growing endoprostheses in children with primary malignant tumours of the proximal femur and analyses the results.

Between 1983 and 1996 we treated nine children with primary bone tumors of the proximal femur by resection and proximal femoral extensible replacements. Outcomes measured were function of the limb using Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score, oncologic outcome, complications and equalization of limb length. Results: Four patients died as a result of pulmonary metastases. The remaining five patients were observed for an average follow-up period of 7. 6 years (range 11–12. 7 years). One patient had a hindquarter amputation for uncontrolled infection. In these five patients we performed an average of 10. 2 operative procedures per patient (range of 3–17 procedures) including 5 lengthening procedures (range of 1–8 procedures) and a mean total extension of 69. 7 mm per patient. Acetabular loosening and hip dislocations were the most frequent complications. Only two patients have not had a revision or a major complication. Despite this, 4 children are alive with a functioning lower limb and a mean Musculoskeletal Tumour Society functional score of 77. 6%. The limb length discrepancy was less than 1 0 mm in three of these patients. The remaining patient has a discrepancy of 50 mm and is awaiting further limb equalization procedures.

Extendible endoprostheses of the proximal femur in selected children is a viable reconstructive procedure. It allows for equalization of limb length and the ability to walk without the use of mobility aids.

Endoprosthetic replacement (EPR) following Bone Tumour excision is common. A major complication of EPRs is infection, which can have disastrous consequences.

This paper investigates the cause of infection, management and sequelae.

Over 10, 000 patients have been treated in our unit over 34 years. Information collected prospectively on a database includes demographic data, diagnosis, treatment (including adjuvant), complications, and outcomes. Data was analysed to identify any infection in EPRs, its management and outcome. Factors such as operating time, blood loss, adjuvant therapy, type of prosthesis (extendable or standard) were investigated. Outcomes of treatment options were evaluated. Data was analysed on 1265 patients undergoing EPR over 34 years, giving a total follow up time of over 6500 patient years.

137 (10.8%) patients have been diagnosed with deep infection (defined by a positive culture [n=128] or a clinically infected prosthesis with pus in the EPR cavity [n=9]). Of these 49 (34%) required amputations for uncontrollable infection. The commonest organisms were Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus aureus and Group D Streptococci. The only satisfactory limb salvaging operation was 2 stage revision, which had 71% success in curing infection. Systemic antibiotics, antibiotic cement or beads and surgical debridement had little chance of curing infection. Infection rates were highest in the Tibial (23.1%) & Pelvic (22.9%) EPRs (p< 0.0001). Patients who had pre or post-operative radiotherapy had significantly higher rates of infection (p< 0.0001), as did patients with extendable EPRs (p=0.007).

Patients who had subsequently undergone patella resurfacing and rebushing also had a higher rate of infection (p=0.019 and p=0.052). Infection is a serious complication of EPRs. Treatment is difficult and prolonged. 2 stage revision is the only reliable method for limb salvage following deep infection. Prevention must be the key to reducing the incidence of this serious complication.

34 two-stage revision procedures were carried out between 1989 and 1998 for controlling deep infection following resection of bone tumours and reconstruction with endoprostheses. In 4 cases the procedure failed with early recurrent infection. In six others infection reappeared after further operative procedures. Six of these ten patients required amputation. The success of the procedure in controlling infection was 75% at 5 years. Two stage revision procedures have proved effective in controlling infection in massive endoprostheses but the risk of re-infection appears to be much greater in patients requiring further surgery for any cause.

Although pathological fractures in the aged are usually due to metastasis, solitary lesions with undetected primary should be treated with caution. Assumption of such lesions as metastatic and their subsequent internal fixation could lead to completely inappropriate treatment if the lesion turns out to be a primary sarcoma of bone.

Referrals to our bone tumour service over a four year period were analysed. There were 62 pathological fractures of which 11(17. 8%) were primary sarcomas that were treated as a metastasis. The limb salvage was compromised and survival rates poor in these group.

Although it is believed that primary sarcomas are rare in the aged, our database confirms that 14% of primary sarcomas affect this age group. The survival figures of primary sarcomas in the aged (> 60 years) treated at our centre was a mean of 43 months with a 5-year survival of 22%. The presence of a pathological fracture did not significantly alter the long-term survival of these patients. On the other hand, metastasis had a poor survival with a mean of 19 months and a 5-year survival of 4% showing a significant difference. In addition, these patients underwent major inappropriate surgeries, which rendered limb-salvage difficult, worsened the morbidity and caused mental distress to patients.

Any pathological fracture in the aged presenting as a solitary osseous lesion with an undetected primary or even remote primary should be treated with caution. Their diagnosis needs to be established by biopsy whatever the age of the patient before any form of internal fixation is undertaken. The temptation to carry out biopsy and internal fixation at the same sitting or even a prophylactic fixation should be avoided when the diagnosis is not clear. Standard principles of musculoskeletal oncology need to be followed.

Local recurrence (LR) following treatment of a sarcoma is generally accepted to be a poor prognostic sign and an indicator both of inadequate local control as well as of the failure of adjuvant treatment.

Of 2589 patients with non metastatic Ewings, osteo-sarcoma, chondrosarcoma or a soft tissue sarcoma, 316 have developed LR at some stage following initial treatment of their tumour. 120 were already known to have metastases elsewhere when they developed LR or were found to have them at time of restaging but 196 developed LR as the first sign of relapse.

The mean time to development of LR was 24 months and 72% had arisen within the first two years. Overall survival following LR was 25% at 5 years and 20% at 10 yrs. In patients with metastases at the time of LR or who were found to have them at the time of restaging the median survival was 6 months with only 12% being alive at 2 years. In those with LR as first sign of relapse median survival was 3 years with 30% long term survivors. Patients with low grade tumours had a better outcome than those with high grade – 50% being cured by further surgery. Of the high grade tumours without metastases at time of diagnosis relapsed Ewing’s had the worst prognosis with median survival of 8 months compared with 22 months for osteosarcoma, 36 months for STS and 36 months for chondrosarcoma, despite which overall survival was 16% for both Ewing’s and osteo-sarcoma patients but was 30% for chondrosarcoma and STS.

LR following sarcoma surgery is due to a combination of aggressive disease with inadequate surgery and ineffective adjuvant treatment. In isolated LR aggressive further treatment is justified with an outcome similar to that of metastatic disease.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the Co-ordinate revision knee prosthesis (Depuy Ltd, Johnson and Johnson, Warsaw, In) between 1995–2001.

Methods: One hundred and thirty-three knees (126 patients) undergoing revision total knee replacement between 1995–2001 were followed up prospectively. Surgery was performed by one surgeon (senior author). The patients were scored pre-operatively and postoperatively with SF-12 and WOMAC score. Surgery was performed for aseptic loosening (92%) and infection (8%). The changes in SF-12 physical score and the WOMAC score between pre and post operation were significant (SF-12 p < 0.0018, WOMAC pain p< 0.0001, WOMAC stiffness p< 0.0001, WOMAC Function p< 0.0001)). The prosthesis produced reliable relief of pain and improved range of movement with minimal complications.

Conclusion: This modular knee revision system produced satisfactory results in dealing with bone loss and instability in the medium term.

Purpose: As part of the step-wise introduction of a meniscal-bearing total knee replacement (Oxford TMK) we needed to know, before proceeding to longer term studies, whether its early clinical results were at least as good as those of an established fixed bearing device (AGC).

Material and Methods: With ethical approval, patients requiring bilateral knee replacement for osteoarthritis consented to have the operations under one anaesthetic using one of each prosthesis; to accept random choice of knee; and to remain ignorant which side was which. American Knee Society Scores, Oxford Knee Scores, ROM and pain scores were to be recorded preoperatively and at one year. By January 2001, 40 patients had reached one year and data is available for 36.

Results: Preoperatively there was no difference between the two knees. One patient died in the peri-operative period.

Results at one year (TMK first): AKSS(Knee) 91.6 / 84.1 (p=0.003), OKS 39.8 / 37.6 (p=0.006), ROM 104 / 104 (p=0.364), Pain (AKSS) 47.3 / 41.7 (p=0.01), Pain (OKS) 3.5 / 2.9 (p=0.006).

Conclusion: The TMK performed as well as the AGC. Its AKSS, OKS and pain scores were significantly better. We believe this controlled, blinded trial is the first to have compared the function of a new knee prosthesis with a standard implant before marketing; and the first to have demonstrated a significant clinical advantage for a meniscal-bearing over a fixed bearing TKR. The comparison of bilateral implants in the same patient can reveal significant differences while putting at risk many fewer subjects than would be needed for a classical twocohort RCT.

We report the role of our advanced nurse practitioner (ANP) with particular relevance to cost effectiveness, patient satisfaction and data collection.

Our nurse practitioner has been involved in arthroplasty care since 1996. Her duties include preoperative assessment, health advice, informed consent, clinical follow up and maintenance of a database for research/audit. Follow up radiographs are reviewed regularly by the entire medical team in a teaching environment. Relative costs of this service were calculated using outpatient charging data. 100 postal questionnaires were used to assess patient satisfaction. Patients answered 13 questions relating to the service they received.

Knee arthroplasty follow up through the nurse led clinic was half the cost of follow up through the consultant led clinic. 80 patients returned the postal questionnaire. Responses were very supportive of the nurse practitioner service. 76 (95%) of patients were happy to be assessed by the ANP and felt that their problems were dealt with appropriately. 17 (21%) of patients felt they should be seen by a surgeon at some stage during their routine follow up. Overall, 75 (94%) of patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the service, 1 (1%) was dissatisfied and 4 (5%) did not answer this question.

Increasing patient numbers and demand for high quality care combined with a decrease in doctors hours worked has lead to a shortage of time for discussion of ‘prehabilitation’ and postoperative care. Long term clinical and radiological follow up leading to adequate research and audit must not be compromised. A trained nurse practitioner working in conjunction with the surgical team is a cost effective way of improving total patient care, audit and research within a department. We have found a high degree of patient satisfaction with this approach.