Purpose: A new radiographic classification of the femoral trochlea was proposed by David Dejour in 1998 to quantify the severity of bony dysplasia. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the reproducibility of this classification system and to determine its contribution to the identification of trochlea with a high-risk of femoropatellar instability.

Material and methods: Nine independent observers (one resident, four junior surgeons, four senior surgeons) with no knowledge of the patient’s history read 68 strict lateral views of knees with femoropatellar instability (53 objective instabilities (OI) and 15 potential instabilities (PI)). The classification system includes four types determined with three signs: crossing (defining the dysplasia and present in all four types), supratrochlear spike, double contour. The four types are: type A crossing alone, type B crossing and spike, type C crossing and double contour, type D crossing, spike and double contour. The kappa test was used to assess reproducibility and chi square test to analyse data by category.

Results: Twenty-one radiographs were excluded by one or several observers due to insufficient quality or the impossibility to identify the signs of the new classification. Interob-server reproducibility assess on 47 radiographs was fair (kappa = 0.48). The crossing sign was identified by the nine observers on the 47 radiographs. Reproducibility of identification of the spike was good (κ= 0.62), but was fair for the double contour (κ = 0.51). there was no difference in reproducibility by level of experience of the observers. The new classification system was not correlated with severity of femoropatellar instability: presence of spike 80% OI, absence of spike 67% OI; presence of double contour 74% OI, absence of double contour 75% OI.

Discussion, conclusion: This new classification system is more reproducibly than the former 3-type system proposed by Henri Dejour. The crossing sign and the spike are the most reproducible signs. There presence is however insufficient to quantify the dysplasia and predict the severity of the femoropatellar instability. A quantitative measure of the depth of the trochlea, which shows excellent reproducibility (interclass coefficient 0.65) could be added to better quantify the morphological anomaly and determine the most adapted treatment.

Purpose: Changes in the lever arm of the abductors is not always perfectly controlled during implantation of total hip arthroplasties. Its possible effect on the development of prothesis dislocation is not known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the lever arm and its modifications on the development of prosthetic instability.

Material and methods: We analysed prospectively 73 total hip arthroplasties implanted via the posterolateral approach. The study group was composed of a consecutive series of 45 dislocated prostheses and a control group of 28 stable prostheses selected at random. The following measurements were made on the anteroposterior x-ray: 1) lever arm of the abductors, 2) femoral offset. These measures were compared with the healthy contralateral hip and when this hip was diseased or had a prosthesis, with the pre-implantation x-rays.

Results: None of the studied parameters was statistically different between the dislocated and stable prostheses. However, in the dislocated prostheses, the lever arm of the abductors before insertion of the prosthesis was shorter than in the control group (p = 0.04) suggesting the presence of a group of hips “at risk”. There was a correlation between the offset values and the lever arm values for the stable prostheses and for the healthy contralateral hips in both groups. Conversely, this balance was not found in the dislocated hips. The lever arm/offset ratio was calculated to determine if the ideal ratio influenced hip stability. This ratio was not directly related to the development of dislocation, but it was decreased for dislocated hips. This ratio was ideal for 75% of the stable prostheses and for only 53% of the dislocated prostheses.

Conclusions: We concluded that: 1) hips “at risk” of dislocation would have a shorter lever arm, 2) the lever arm or the femoral offset do not have a direct effect on dislocation, and 3) stable hip prostheses have a balance similar to that in healthy hips identified by a correlation between the lever arm and the femoral offset. We thus emphasise the importance of respecting these parameters although they are probably not the only factors influencing prosthesis stability. Allowable variations are small, demanding careful and precise operation planning.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to follow a prospective cohort of young subjects with total hip arthroplasties (THA) in order to determine 1) how they complied with instructions concerning the surveillance of their implant, and 2) determine factors affecting non-compliance and the potential consequences in terms of wear.

Material and methods: We implanted fifty Harris I cups with the ABG I stem in 15 young men and 24 young women (11 bilateral implantations) between 1991 and 1995. These patients were a non-consecutive prospective series of patients under 60 years of age (mean age at implantation was 38 ± 11 years, range 15–58 years). The ABG I stem was implanted when the femoral canal was cylindrical, other implants were chosen for other morphologies. 28-mm femoral heads were used in 38 cases (30 zircone, 8 chromium-cobalt, polyethylene thickness 8.6 mm, range 8.3–12.4). The patients were informed of the need for regular surveillance with controls at two months, and one year and then every two years. We re-evaluated all the patients again in 2000. Radiographic wear was assessed according to Livermore using a numeric table (OrthoGraphics).

Results: At mean follow-up of 72 ± 14 months (5–9 years), 20 of the 39 patients (25/50 implants) had not attended the intermediary consultations, but all were seen again for the systematic review made in 2000. There was no particular factor related to non-attendance other than male gender (p = 0.04). Wear was rather severe. Mean values were: linear wear 1.32 mm, 0.23 mm/an. Thirty-seven percent of the patients who had severe annual linear wear (> 0.2 mm) had not attended consultations, all were asymptomatic. The 28 mm head produced more volumetric wear than the 22 mm heads (p = 0.008). There was no other factor correlated with severity of wear (age, sex, activity, polyethylene thickness). This systematic revision led to: three replacements due to excessive wear > 2 mm and replacements planned for three others with > 2 mm wear. These six patients were asymptomatic and three of the six had never attended the planned visits.

Conclusion: Despite our recommendations, half of the patients did not comply with the planned surveillance protocol. Non-compliance being inevitable, we recommend regular systematic recalls to detect severe wear early, even in asymptomatic patients. In addition, our study demonstrated that zircone heads contribute little and confirmed the interest of 22 mm heads to limit wear phenomena.