Outcomes for a RSP to treat either a previous operated shoulder (revision procedure) was compared to a primary RSP.

Twenty primary RSP (6M, 14F) for an irreparable rotator cuff tear (IRCT) with glenohumeral arthritis /anterior superior arch deficiency and 31 revision RSP (10M, 21F) (previous rotator or cuff surgery, hemi or total shoulder arthroplasty) were evaluated at an average of 24 months postoperatively. Mean age at the time of RSP was 72.3 for primaries 67.2 for revisions. Assessment with pre- and postoperatively SF-36, SST, ASES scores, physical exam, satisfaction surveys, and radiographs was performed.

Primary RSP improvements /Revision RSP improvements were: 9.4 sf-36 PCS/ 6.3 sf-36 PCS, 1.8 SST/ 1.6 SST,31.8ASES / 17.5ASES (p< 0.05),49.2 elevation/ 14.2 elevation (p< 0.05) and 57.8 external rotation/ 30 external rotation. 71.3% Excellent/good/. 56% Excellent/ good (p< 0.05), 21.4% satisfactory/ 33.3% satisfactory, 7.1% unsatisfactory outcome/ 9.5% unsatisfactory outcome. Complications only occurred in the revisions including component disassociation, glenoid loosening, recurrent instability, and infection

Primary RSP provides predictable improvements in pain and function with minimal complications. Revision RSP has a higher complication rate and improvements in pain and function are less reliable. Conventional shoulder arthroplasty for patients with IRCT with gle-nohumeral arthritis/anterior superior arch deficiency has resulted in adequate pain relief but functional improvement has not been predictable. Thus, the initial operative selection for these patients must consider the effect of a failed reconstructive attempt on patient outcomes.

There are multiple proximal prosthetic geometries available for a surgeon to select when humeral head replacement is indicated for four-part proximal humerus fractures. We compared different proximal prosthetic geometries in stable and unstable fracture patterns, with a standard tuberosity fixation method.

Simulated four-part fractures were created with an oscillating saw in six synthetic shoulder models. Three different proximal prosthetic geometries used polymetylmethacrelate (PMMA) – a smooth circular shape (SCS), a diamond shape (DS) and an irregular multiple fin shape (IMFS) prostheses. A standardised fixation method using vertical, and horizontal straps along with a medial based cerclage strap was performed. Passive motion was then carried out using a robotic articulator. Interfragmentary displacement was measured from tuberosity to tuberosity as well as tuberosity to shaft using mercury strain gauges.

The least amount of interfragmentary motion occurred when an IMFS was used in a stable fracture pattern. This geometry provided more interfragmentary stability even with the unstable fracture pattern than the DS or SCS. The least stable construct was the SCS prosthesis with an unstable fracture pattern.

Prosthetic geometry does affect stability of tuberosity reconstruction in proximal humerus fractures. An irregular shaped prosthesis augments the fixation construct. When using a smooth prosthetic design a stable fracture pattern must be achieved to prevent excessive interfragmentary motion. A smooth prosthetic design for tuberosity reconstruction is not recommended.

To compare the results of standard open carpal tunnel release against minimal access release using the ‘Stryker Knifelight’ in the same patients.

A prospective, randomised trial was carried out recruiting all patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. There were 26 patients (18 females and 8 males), with a mean age of 48 years. The patients were randomised to having the ‘Knifelight’ on one side and therefore acted as their own controls. They were assessed preoperatively, and at 2 and 6 weeks postop by questionnaire, and grip strength measurements.

All sides were improved following release but those done by the open method were more likely to have complete resolution at 6 weeks. In contrast, the ‘Knife-light’ sides had better grip strength and allowed earlier return to work. In terms of preference, the patients were split equally between the 2 techniques. 2 patients had minor complications following minimal access release including one with numbness over the thenar eminence for 6 weeks.

This study shows that open carpal tunnel release remains the ‘gold standard’ but the minimal access technique offers some advantages in terms of quicker recovery.

To compare the effectiveness of immediate open anterior capsulolabral reconstruction (ACLR) with conventional treatment in young military personnel who had sustained a first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation, we carried out a prospective non-randomised study of 34 recruit and active-duty servicemen (average, 20 years).

All patients met the following criteria: 1) an acute first- time traumatic anterior dislocation, 2) no history of impingement or occult subluxation, 3) the dislocation required a manual reduction, and 4) no concomitant fracture or neurological injury. Group 1 (16 patients) were immobilised in a sling for 6 weeks followed by an intensive rehabilitation programme. Group 2 (18 patients) underwent open ACLR within 10 days of dislocation followed by the same rehabilitation protocol as Group 1.

The average follow-up was 36 months; all patients were available for review. Twelve (75%) non-operatively treated patients developed recurrent instability all of whom required subsequent open repair. In the surgical repair group, there were no cases of recurrent instability.

Early open repair (ACLR) significantly reduces the incidence of recurrent instability in young military personnel who sustain an acute initial anterior shoulder dislocation.

Purpose: To determine if it is necessary to assess instability of the chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee under general anaesthesia.

Materials and methods: 27 anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees in 27 patients were evaluated both subjectively using the Lachmanns and pivot shift test and objectively using the KT 1000 arthometer. This was done in the preoperative clinic (without the patient anaesthetised) and subsequently in the anaesthetic room with the patient anaesthetised (under general anaesthesia) prior to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The data was prospectively collected. Only data on 21 knees was available for analysis. There were 20 females and one male with an average age of 29 years.

Results: There was no statistical significant difference (using students T test) between the data collected using the KT 1000 arthometer with and without the patient anaesthetised.

A significant difference was noted both for the Lachmanns (p< 0.01) and pivot shift test (p< 0.001) between the results obtained with and without anaesthesia. This however did not change the management.

Conclusion: Assessing the chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee using the KT 1000 arthrometer, Lachmann and pivot shift test under general anaesthesia is not necessary if these assessments have been carried out in clinic.

In Musgrave Park Hospital, Belfast, younger patients requiring THR were treated by custom-made titanium alloy femoral prosthesis. The identifit hips, which were used initially, were intraoperatively customised by preparing a silicon mould of the endosteal cavity and immediate computer assisted fabrication. The Xpress hips used measurements from preoperative marker x-rays allowing creation of templates and subsequent computer analysis to mill a stem prior to surgery.

7 identifit and 51 Xpress primary uncemented custom THRs were inserted in 50 patients between May 92 and June 96. The average age for the indentifit cases was 47 years (range 24–72) and the Xpress cases 39 years (range 23–51). The Xpress cases were followed up to an average of 47 months (range 12–74 months) and identifit cases to an average of 59 months (range 14–77 months). The indications for arthroplasty were osteoarthrosis in 15 hips, CDH in 14, dysplasia in 11, AVN in 4, rheumatoid arthritis in 3 and other diagnosis in 11. Clinical assessments were made using the Oxford score and the Modified Harris Hip score. The postoperative radiographs were evaluated for subsidence of the prosthesis; and adaptive osseous changes like osteolysis, hypertrophic cortical remodelling, sclerotic radiolucent line formation around the prosthesis and formation of a bone pedestal below the tip of the prosthesis.

The average post-op Oxford hip score for those patients not revised was 32.5 /60 (range 12–51).

16 of the 51 Xpress hips underwent revision and 2 were awaiting revision, which is a failure rate of 35.3%. Of the identifit hips 1 out of the 7 was revised (14.3%). Overall 32.8% was the rate of failure. The average duration from primary operation to revision was 47 months for Xpress hips and 90 months for the identifit hips. Of the Xpress hips, revision was done for acetabular component in 1, femoral component in 4, both components in 1, acetabular liner + femoral head in 1 and acetabular liner + femoral component in 9. The 1 revision in the identifit hip was for recurrent dislocation.

The reasons for revision in the Xpress hips were dislocation in 2 cases, loose femoral component in 13 cases and infection in 1.

Average subsidence of the femoral component was 6mm (range 0–25.9) and this did not have significant correlation with predicting outcome. Pedestal formation (intramedullary formation of bone beneath the tip of the femoral stem) was seen in 87%, sclerotic rediolucent lines were seen in 64%, osteolysis was found in 31% and hypertrophic cortical remodelling was seen in 31%. These also did not reach significance in predicting outcome.

Thus even though the idea of an uncemented custom THR is attractive, especially in the younger age group, the failure rate was found to be unacceptably high. On the basis of these data we have discontinued the use of this custom made non-porous uncemented femoral prosthesis.