The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relative contribution of each component in the ultimate strength and stiffness of the Evolgate (Citieffe), which is presently a widely used fixation device in DGST ACL reconstruction. The three components of the Evolgate were tested using fresh frozen animal tissue stored at −20° Celsius. Common extensor tendons were harvested from 20-month-old bovine forelimbs. Twenty-four tests were performed for each of the following configurations: six tests using Evolgate complete, six tests using screw alone, six tests using screw and washer and six tests using screw and coil. A randomised t-test was used; differences were considered significant when p<
0.05. The mean strength was: Evolgate complete 1314±194N; coil and screw 700±152N; screw alone 408±86N; and screw and washer 333±93N. There was a significant difference between fixation strength of Evolgate and the other devices, none between screw alone and screw and washer. The mean slippage of the Evolgate was significantly lower than the other devices. The mean stiffness of the Evolgate (269±14 N/mm) was significantly greater than the other devices. On the basis of the results of the present study, the coil appears to be the most important component of the Evolgate, resulting in a significant increase of the fixation strength of the screw. However, it is important to note that, as the washer alone does not improve the strength of the screw, if a washer is associated with a coil a further significant increase in strength and stiffness of the device is observed.
The purpose of this study is to biomechanically evaluate how four different fixation devices (two femoral and two tibial) associated in three different combinations, using cyclic loading with final pull-out test, affect the strength and the stiffness of the femur-graft-tibia complex. We conducted a controlled laboratory study and tested, using cyclic loading with final pull-out, two femoral devices (Swing- bridge and Endobutton CL) and two tibial device (Evolgate and BioRCI screw) in three different combinations: Group A, EB-Bio RCI; Group B, EB-Evolgate; and Group C, SB- Evolgate. We used porcine knees and bovine digital extensor tendons and evaluated the stiffness and strength at the final pull-out, and the displacement at the 1st, 100th, 300th, 500th and 1000th cycle. A t-test was used for statistical evaluation. There was a statistically significant difference in ultimate failure load between group A and group B (p=0.03) and group A and group C (p=0.0007) but no difference between group B and group C (p=0.72). There was a statistically significant difference in ultimate failure load between group A and group C (p=0.02) and group B and group C (p=0.01) but no difference between group A and group B (p=0.88). Due to the biomechanical properties of the F-G-T complex the combination of Swing-Bridge and Evolgate seems to be a good alternative when an accelerated post-operative rehabilitation is planned after ACL reconstruction using DGST.
Maintenance of the bone stock is a primary goal in hip surgery. The idea of a resurfacing hip prosthesis had already been proposed in the past without success. The improvement in prosthetic materials, however, has mades it possible to reconsider the use of resurfacing prostheses. We report our experience with the Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) prosthesis. We operated on 58 patients (60 hips, two bilaterally), 31 men, 27 women, with a mean age of 47.9 years (25–76) and a mean follow-up of 27 months (1–42). We used the posterolateral approach with the patient in lateral decubitus. We performed a clinical and radiographic examination before surgery and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. We recorded a statistically significant improvement in the clinical score at 6 months after surgery, with respect to the preoperative examination. Major complications were two fractures of the femoral neck and one infection. We recorded also peri-prosthetic calcifications in two patients, calcifications of the ileopsoas in two and ileopsoas tendinitis in one. In conclusion, in our experience, the BHR prosthesis reproduced the biomechanics of the hip and minimised the risk of luxation. The preliminary clinical results are encouraging, also for difficult cases.
The purpose of our study was to determine the effect of 4 weeks and 12 weeks of implantation on the strength of a tendon graft in a bone tunnel using a low-profile fixation device, Evolgate, in an extra-articular ovine model. Moreover, we evaluated the histological changes. The common digital extensor tendon was detached from the lateral femoral condyle and fixed with the Evolgate device in a 30-mm-long tunnel placed obliquely across the dense metaphyseal bone of the proximal tibia. We performed either biomechanical or histological study. Three sheep were sacrified at time 0 and their posterior limbs were used for biomechanical tests. Six sheep were used for biomechanical tests at time 1 (4 weeks) and at time 2 (12 weeks). The other three sheep were used for histological evaluation after 4 and 12 weeks of implantation. The biomechanical tests included a 50 N preload applied for 10 s and a cyclic load test in 50-N increments until failure to evaluate the ultimate failure load. We used a paired t-test to evaluate the difference between group at T1 and group at T2 with the control group at time 0, respectively. Tests were performed using an electromechanic machine (Zwick-Roell Z010, Zwick-Roell, Ulm, Germany). Data were recorded with dedicated software (Textexpert 8.1, Zwick-Roell). The biomechanical results show an improvement of about 50% in strength after 4 and 12 weeks post-implantation, respectively. The histological evaluation shows a layer of cellular, fibrous tissue between the tendon and the bone, along the length of the bone tunnel; this layer progressively matured and reorganised during the healing process. The collagen fibres that attached the tendon to the bone resembled Sharpey fibres. The strength of the interface was noted to have significantly and progressively increased between the second and the 12th week after the transplantation. The progressive increase in strength was correlated with the degree of bone ingrowth, mineralisation, and maturation of the healing tissue, noted histologically.
The use of conventional stems in hip arthroplasty may be difficult in cases of dysplasia, coxa vara or coxa valga, after fracture or proximal femur osteotomy. In fact the morphologic alterations of the proximal femur might require prosthetic components characterised by small size and different neck angles to restore correct joint biomechanics. In these cases we are often compelled to compromise between the ideal implant aneiversion and fit and what we can really achieve. An alternative to conventional prostheses is represented by custom-made prostheses. For 3 years we have been using the Modulus stem in the treatment of morphologic disorders of the hip. The conic shape of the stem easily fits the different morphologies of the proximal femur, whereas the modularity of the neck makes it possible to correct length, inclination and declination of the femural neck. We studied 59 patients by clinical and radiographic examination before surgery and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. We recorded a statistically significant improvement in the clinical score already at 1 month but this was even better at 6 months after surgery, with respect to the pre-operative examination. With the use of this prosthesis, the recovery of correct joint biomechanics together with high tribologic standards could improve the implant survival, leading to cost reduction and patient satisfaction.
Secure tendon-to-bone fixation is essential for successful rotator cuff repair. Thus, the biomechanical properties of devices used in rotator cuff repair should be better understood. This controlled laboratory study was performed to evaluate response to incremental cyclic loading of six different anchor-wire complexes commonly used in rotator cuff repair. Two absorbable anchors 5 and 6.5 mm in diameter and one metallic anchor, coupled with both ethibond or fibrewire (FW) were tested on five pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric shoulders. An incremental cyclic load was applied until failure using a Zwich-Roell Z010 electromechanical testing machine. The ultimate failure load and mode of failure were recorded. A t-test was used for statistical analysis. The FW suture coupled both with absorbable and metallic anchors provides a statistically significant stronger fixation. However, while the metallic anchors in most cases fail due to the slippage of the anchor, absorbable anchors fail due to rupture of the loop. The FW seems to increase the strength of fixation devices under cyclic load both using absorbable or metallic anchors with relevant differences in failure mode (slippage of the metallic anchor and loop failure in absorbable ones). Using a FW suture, the risk of metallic anchor migration might increase.
The increase in knee arthroscopy performed on an out-patient basis, along with the need for cost reduction and a safe and rapid patient discharge, has underlined the importance of adequate anaesthesia techniques. We designed this study to compare efficacy, efficiency and surgeon’s satisfaction of total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifentanil with those of spinal or peripheral nerve blocks for outpatient knee arthroscopy. A total of 120 patients undergoing elective outpatient knee arthroscopy were randomly allocated to receive total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and remifent-anil (n=40), combined sciatic-femoral nerve block (n=40) or spinal anaesthesia (n=40). Preparation times, surgeon’s satisfaction, discharge times and anaesthesia-related costs with the three anaesthesia techniques were analysed. Preparation time was shorter with general anaesthesia (13 min) than with spinal anaesthesia or sciatic-femoral block (15 min; p=0.006). Surgeon’s satisfaction was similar in the three groups. Furthermore, 17 patients receiving peripheral nerve block (42%) and 12 receiving spinal anaesthesia (30%) by-passed the post-anaesthesia care unit after surgery as compared with only two general anaesthesia patients (5%; p=0.01). Discharge from the post-anaesthesia care unit was more rapid after peripheral block; however, stay in the Day Surgery Unit was shorter after general anaesthesia than peripheral or spinal blocks (p=0.026). Urinary retention was reported in three spinal anaesthesia patients only (8%; p=0.03). Regional anaesthesia techniques reduce the rate of admission and the duration of stay in the post-anaesthesia care unit as compared with general anaesthesia. Peripheral rather than spinal nerve blocks should be preferred to minimise the risk of urinary retention.