The aim of this study was to analyse the kneeling ability of patients before and at one and two years after total (TKR), unicompartmental (UKR) and selective patellofemoral (PFR) knee arthroplasty, for osteoarthritis. Method: Data was prospectively collected on 253 knees, which underwent either TKR, UKR or PFR. A kneeling score was obtained by analysis of the relevant section of the Oxford Knee Score questionnaire. Scores were obtained pre-operatively and at 1 and 2 years post-operatively (minimum score 0, maximum 4). Absolute values and change following arthroplasty were recorded. Correlations with pain and other knee functions were also made.

Results: Kneeling ability prior to surgery was poor in all three groups (mean score 0.7 out of 4) and improved significantly after surgery (mean score at one year 1.13 and at two years 1.46 out of 4) (P< 0.001). Kneeling ability at 1 year differed significantly with operation type (p = 0.02). Kneeling ability improved most in the first year post-operatively but continued to improve between one and two years although the final function was still not good. Kneeling ability was best in UKR and worst in PFR, with the difference between these prostheses being statistically significant (P< 0.001).

Conclusion: Kneeling ability in osteoarthritic knees is poor but improves with arthroplasty. However, the majority of patients will still have difficulty kneeling.

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of a customised coupled arthrodesis nail.

Knee arthrodesis is now infrequently performed and is usually reserved as a salvage for infected Joint arthroplasty or occasionally for intractable pain. Many methods have been used. Recently locked intramedullary coupled nails have gained in popularity. To deal with all size combinations a large inventory is required. We wish to report our series using a customised implant and to compare the outcome with other methods of knee arthrodesis.

Nine patients underwent arthrodesis using this implant, six following infected arthroplasty, two for intractable anterior knee pain and following trauma. Comparison was made with 17 arthrodeses performed since 1993 using external fixation (8), plates (4), and long K-nails (5). Union was achieved in nine patients (100%) at a mean time of 10 months using the customised implant. There were no complications despite early weight-bearing. No further procedures were required. This contrasted with a union rate of 65% with a 76% complication rate using alternative techniques. Seventy six percent of this second group required a further operative procedure.

We conclude that a customised coupled intramedullary nail can give excellent stability allowing early weight-bearing, and results in a high union rate with minimal post-operative complications. The differences in need for further surgery and occurrence of complications were statistically significant (p< 0.001), and differences in in-patient stay and non-union rate were also significant (p< 0.05) using Fisher’s exact test.

Aim: To assess the functional results of revision TKR with the PFC/TC3 system, and to correlate this with the reasons for revision and restoration of joint height.

Method: One hundred and fifty three patients underwent revision TKR using the PFC/TC3 system. Data was prospectively collected (using the Bristol Knee Score) pre-operatively and at a mean of 4.2 years post-revision. Forty three revisions were for infection and 81 revisions were for aseptic loosening. Measurements of the joint height were made pre and post-operatively using Figgie’s method and were divided into three groups: lower by more than 5mm, restored and elevated more than 5mm. Use of distal augments and polyethylene thickness were recorded.

Results: The mean pre-op function score was 12 and post-operatively was 19 for the infection group and 20 for the aseptic loosening group. Revision after initial UKR gave a mean score of 21, while revision after TKR gave a mean score of 18 (max 27). Knees in which the joint line was elevated by more than 5 mm had a mean score of 17 while those where the joint line was restored had a mean score of 1 9. Recent increasing use of distal augments improved the joint line and results.

Conclusion: Revision using the PFC/TC3 system produced acceptable medium term functional results and good survival. Better restoration of joint line and functional results were achieved by distal femoral rather than proximal tibial augmentation.

Objective: To report the survivorship rate and clinical outcome of a large series of lateral unicompartmental replacements.

Method: 88 lateral St Georg Sled LTKRS were performed between 1978 and 1999. Clinical and radiological data was prospectively recorded at regular follow up and only 5 knees were lost during the 22 year period.

Results: 15 knees were revised after an average of 8 years. (eight for progressive arthritis, six for loosening and four for femoral fracture) 29 patients (30 knees) died during the course of the study. At final follow up (average 9 years) 50 of the 63 remaining knees were rated as good or excellent, nine as fair and nine poor. The mean range of flexion was 110°.

At 10 years the cumulative survival rate was 83% and at 15 years 78% (10 knees at risk). The “worst case scenario” where knees with pain or lost to follow up are added to revisions shows a 10 year survivorship of 74%.

Conclusion: Although the results are not as good as medial UKR. These clinical outcomes suggest that the conservative surgical procedure of lateral UKR with the fixed bearing St George Sled prosthesis can give acceptable results in the uncommon situation of severely symptomatic isolated lateral tibio femoral arthritis.

Purpose: To compare the ten-year survivorship results of an established total and medial compartment knee replacement performed in a single centre over an eighteen year period.

Method: Since 1978 knee replacements have been prospectively recorded in Bristol on a database. Regular clinical and radiological review has been undertaken every two or three years up to twenty years. 408 medial St Georg Unicompartmental replacements and 531 Kinematic total knee replacements have been subject to survivorship analysis using three failure end points. One - revision or removal of the implant. Two – revision or removal and moderate or severe pain. Three – the worst case including all patients lost to follow-up.

Results: The follow-up rate was 97% in both groups. 212 patients (562 knees) died and 31 patients (35 knees) were lost to follow-up. At ten years 25 medial Sled and 20 Kinematic knee arthroplasties had been revised. There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the number of good and excellent results. The mean range of movement at the last follow-up was 109 degrees for the medial Sled and 100 degrees for the Kinematic (p< 0.01). 94% of the medial Sled patients obtained a range of movement equal to or greater than 90 degrees whereas only 84% of Kinematic patients obtained this range (p < 0.05).

The ten-year survivorship figures were similar for both groups. Revision as the end point was 87.5% for the medial Sled and 89.6% for the Kinematic knees. When moderate and severe pain was considered in addition to revision ten-year survivorship was 79.4% in both groups. The worst case survivorship was also 74% in both groups.

Conclusion: The ten-year survivorship results of a fixed bearing, non-congruous, Unicompartmental arthroplasty are as good as those of a total knee replacement when performed in a single centre by two consultant surgeons and a variety of trainees. The advantages of a more rapid recovery and better quality result are offset by an easier though slightly higher revision rate.

Purpose: This study analyses the kneeling ability of patients following Unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR), Patellofemoral replacement (PFR) and Total knee replacement (TKR).

Method: Data was prospectively collected on 272 knees (254 patients) that had undergone various forms of arthroplasty procedures for osteoarthritis of the knee. All patients completed the Oxford Knee Questionnaire preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, thus graded their kneeling ability into one of 5 categories. Absolute values and change following arthroplasty were recorded. In addition the reported kneeling ability of 75 patients was checked by clinical examination.

Results: Preoperatively only 2% of all patients could kneel with PFR group being more able than the others (UKR 0%, TKR 0% and PFR 6%). In all groups the kneeling ability was better one year following replacement than preoperatively (23% of UKR, 18% of TKR and 9% of PFR) being able to kneel with little or no difficulty.

Conclusions: No form of arthroplasty used resulted in good kneeling ability, though this function was always improved particularly by UKR. Good range of movement and younger age appeared to correlate with better kneeling ability but many patients thought they had been told not to kneel and reported less ability than they demonstrated on examination. Instruction to avoid kneeling seems unnecessary.

Traditional dogma states that anterior knee pain in adolescence does not lead to patello-femoral arthritis. However analysis of 642 new knee referrals seen in one year showed that over 25% had anterior knee pain and that patients were of all ages. This lead to us questioning whether anterior knee pain or adolescent chondromalacia patellae is in fact a benign self limiting condition.

Method: A postal questionnaire was sent to 150 patients who had undergone isolated patello femoral replacement (PFR) enquiring about patella problems earlier in life. The same questionnaire was sent to a matched group of patients who had undergone unicompartmental replacement; because of the selection policy of the unit, these would not have had changes of patellofemoral arthritis.

Results: 118 patients who had undergone PFR retumed the form. 107 were female; the average age at surgery was 66 years. 26 (22%) reported adolescent anterior knee pain at an average age of 18. 112 forms were returned form the UKR group in which females predominated and who had an average age at surgery of 67 years. Only 7 (6%) reported adolescent anterior knee pain, at an average age of 19. 16 (14%) of the PFR group reported adolescent patella instability as opposed to 1 on the UKR group.

Discussion: The finding that significantly more patients with isolated patello-femoral arthritis had suffered from adolescent anterior knee pain suggests a possible causal relationship. Further long-term studies are needed to determine whether adolescent anterior knee pain is benign, as traditionally believed, or whether certain subsets are precursors of patello-femoral arthritis.