Introduciton In our experience, amputation is rarely indicated in osteosarcoma. Amputation is more frequently required in soft tissue sarcoma for the following reasons: 1) recurrent tumour in previously radiated field; 2) composite tissue involvement of soft tissue, bone, vessels and nerves; 3) size of lesion. We have measured functional outcome in bone and soft tissue sarcoma using a combination of clinimetric measures describing impairment and patient determined measures assessing disability (1,2).

Methods In a matched case-control study (3), 12 patients with amputation were matched with 24 patients treated by limb-sparing surgery on the following variables: age, gender, length of follow-up, bone versus soft-tissue tumor, anatomic site, and treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy. End points included the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), a measure of physical disability; the Shortform-36 (SF-36), a generic health status measure; and the Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL), a measure of handicap.

Results Mean TESS score for the patients with amputations was 74.5 versus 85.1 for the limb-sparing patients. (p = .15). Only the physical function subscale of the SF-36 showed statistically significant differences, with means of 45 and 71.1 for the amputation versus limb-sparing groups, respectively (p = .03). The RNL for the amputation group was 84.4 versus 97 for the limb-sparing group (p = .05). Seven of the 12 patients with amputations experienced ongoing difficulty with the soft tissues overlying their stumps. There was a trend toward increased disability for those in the amputation group versus those in the limb-sparing group, with the amputation group showing significantly higher levels of handicap.

Conclusions These data suggest that the differences in disability between amputation and limb-sparing patients are smaller than anticipated. The differences may be more notable in measuring handicap.

113 consecutive patients with soft tissue sarcoma treated by excision and reconstructive flaps were studied to assess the risk of complications and to compare local tumour control with those in whom primary wound closure was possible.

Minimum follow-up was 24 months and mean age was 55 years (16–95). The sarcoma was located in the lower extremity in 83 and upper extremity 30 patients. Significant wound complications developed in 37 patients (33%). The most common complications were wound infections or partial necrosis occurring in 16% (18/113) and 13% (15/113) respectively. Complete flap necrosis requiring flap removal occurred in 6 patients (5%). Three patients (2.3%) required amputation as a result of complications. Significant risk factors for development of wound complications include location of tumour in the lower limb compared to upper limb (relative risk 2.3, p=0.02) and use of pre-operative radiotherapy compared to no or post-operative radiotherapy (relative risk 2.05, p=0.02). There was no difference in rates of complications in patients with free or pedicled flaps, tumours < or > 5cm, distal or proximal location of tumour.

The rates of negative excision margins (80%) and wound complications in patients who required reconstructive flaps were not different from that for the other patients treated at our centre who did not require reconstructive flaps.

The use of soft tissue reconstructive flaps did not reduce the risk of positive excision margins or the rates of wound complications. The risk of amputation secondary to flap complication or failure is low.