Purpose: Hip fractures are associated with a high rate of mortality and profound temporary and sometimes permanent impairment of independence and quality of life. While guidelines exist for the surgical treatment of hip fracture patients, the effect of surgical delay on mortality and other patient-important outcomes remains unclear. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the effect of early surgery compared with delayed surgery on the risk of mortality, common postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay among elderly hip fracture patients.

Method: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for relevant prospective studies evaluating surgical delay in patients undergoing surgery for hip fractures published in all languages between 1966 and 2008. We identified additional studies through contacting experts, as well as hand searches of the bibliographies of relevant articles and the archives of orthopaedic annual meetings. Two reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted relevant data. When necessary, we contacted authors for clarification of study design or to provide additional data. Data were pooled by use of a DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model based on the inverse variance method.

Results: Of 1917 citations identified, 16 observational studies, which included a total of 13,565 patients with complete mortality data, met our inclusion criteria. Irrespective of the cut-off for delay (24, 48, or 72 hours), earlier surgery (< 24, < 48, or < 72 hours) was significantly associated with a reduction in the risk of unadjusted one-year mortality (relative risk 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.75, p=0.0002) and adjusted mortality rates (relative risk 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.96, p=0.01). Earlier surgery also reduced in-hospital pneumonia (relative risk 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.37 to 0.93, p=0.02), pressure sores (relative risk 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.69, p< 0.0001) and hospital stay (weighted mean difference 9.95 days; 95% confidence interval, 1.52 to 18.39, p=0.02).

Conclusion: Earlier surgery reduced the risk of mortality, postoperative pneumonia, pressure sores, and length of hospital stay among elderly hip fracture patients suggesting that it may be warranted to reduce administrative delays whenever possible. However, potential residual confounding of observational studies may limit any definitive conclusions.

Purpose: Domestic violence is the most common cause of nonfatal injury to women in North America and musculoskeletal injuries were the second most common manifestation of intimate partner violence (IPV). We aimed to identify the perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge about IPV among orthopaedic surgeons.

Method: Using a systematic random sample, we mailed surveys to 362 members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association to identify attitudes towards IPV. The questionnaire consisted of three sections:

General Attitude of Orthopaedic Surgeon Towards IPV,

Up to 3 follow up mailings were performed to enhance response rates.

Results: Respondents (N = 186, response rate: 51%) consisted of 167 (91%) male orthopaedic surgeons, all actively practicing at the time of the survey. Most orthopaedic surgeons (95%) estimated that victims of IPV comprised less than 10% of their patients, the majority of whom (80%) believed it was exceedingly rare.

Conclusion: Orthopaedic surgeons grossly underestimated the prevalence of IPV in their communities. Discomfort with the issue and lack of knowledge led to misconceptions about IPV. The relevance of IPV to surgical practice was well supported but prevalence studies are needed change the current paradigm in orthopaedics.

Purpose: The choice of irrigating fluid and delivery pressure remains controversial. Identifying surgeons’ preferences in techniques and the rationale for their choices may aid in focusing educational activities to the orthopaedic community as well as planning future clinical trials. Our objective was to clarify current opinion with regard to the irrigation of open fracture wounds.

Method: We mailed and delivered a cross-sectional survey using a sample-to-redundancy strategy to members of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association and attendees of an international fracture course (AO, Davos, Switzerland) to examine surgeons’ preferences in the initial management of open fracture wounds.

Results: Of the 1,764 surgeons who received the questionnaire, 984 (55.8%) responded. In the management of open wounds, most surgeons surveyed, 676 (70.5%), favoured normal saline alone, however 16.8% used Bacitracin. Many surgeons, 695 (71%) used low pressures when delivering the irrigating solution to the wound, however variation exists in what constituted high versus low pressure lavage. Surgeons supported the need for a clinical trial evaluating outcomes following both the use of different irrigating solutions as well as irrigating pressures [803 (84.8%) and 730 (77.6%) respectively].

Conclusion: The majority of surgeons favour both normal saline and low pressure lavage for the initial management of open fracture wounds.

In a meta-analysis of fourteen trials (N=1901 patients) in patients with displaced hip fractures, we identified significant reductions in the risk of revision surgery with internal fixation compared to arthroplasty. A trend towards increased mortality with arthroplasty was identified.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of arthroplasty (hemi-arthroplasty, bipolar arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty) in comparison to internal fixation for displaced femoral neck fractures on rates of mortality and revision surgery

Arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures, in comparison to internal fixation, significantly reduces the risk of revision surgery at the cost of greater infection rates, blood loss and operative time, and a possible increase in early mortality.

Over 220,000 fractures of hip occur per year in North America representing an annual seven billion dollar cost to the health care system. Current evidence suggests internal fixation may reduce mortality risk at the consequence of increased revision rates. A large trial is needed to resolve this issue.

We searched computerized databases (MEDLINE, COCHRANE and SCISEARCH) for published clinical studies from 1969–2002 and identified additional studies through hand searches of major orthopaedic journals, bibliographies of major orthopaedic texts and personal files. We found a non-significant trend toward an increase in the relative risk of dying with arthroplasty when compared to internal fixation (relative risk=1.27, 95% confidence interval, 0.84–1.92, p = 0.25; homogeneity p= 0.45). Arthroplasty appeared to increase the risk of dying when compared to pin and plate, but not in comparison to internal fixation using screws (relative risk= 1.75 vs 0.86, respectively, p< 0.05). Fourteen trials provided data on revision surgery (n=1901 patients). The relative risk of revision surgery with arthroplasty was 0.23 (95% confidence interval, 0.13–0.42, p = 0.0003, homogeneity p = < 0.01).

Introduction: Closed and open grade I (low energy) tibial shaft fractures are a common and costly event and optimal management for such injuries remains uncertain.

Methods: We explored costs associated with treatment of low energy tibial fractures with either casting, casting with therapeutic ultrasound, or intramedullary nailing (with and without reaming) by use of a decision tree.

Results: From a governmental perspective the mean associated costs were USD $3 365 (standard deviation [SD] ± 1 425) for operative management by reamed intramedullary nailing, $5 041 (SD ± 1 363) for operative management by non-reamed intramedullary nailing, $5 017 (SD±1 370) for casting, and $5 312 (SD±1 474) for casting with therapeutic ultrasound. From a societal perspective the mean associated costs were ($12 449; SD±4 894) for reamed intramedullary nailing, ($13 266; SD±3 692) for casting with therapeutic ultrasound, ($15 571; SD±4 293) for operative management by non-reamed intramedullary nailing, and ($17 343; SD±4 784) for casting alone.

Interpretation: Our analysis suggests that, from an economical standpoint, reamed intramedullary nailing is the treatment of choice for closed and open grade I tibial shaft fractures. There is preliminary evidence, from a societal perspective, that treatment of low energy tibial fractures with therapeutic ultrasound and casting may also be an economically-sound intervention.