In 2011 20% of intracapsular fractured neck of femurs were treated with an uncemented hemiarthroplasty in the English NHS. National guidelines recommend cemented implants, based on evidence of less pain, better mobility and lower costs. We aimed to compare complications following cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty using the national hospital episode statistics (HES) database in England. Dislocation, revision, return to theatre and medical complications were extracted for all patients with NOF fracture who underwent either cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty between January 2005 and December 2008. To make a ‘like for like’ comparison all 30424 patients with an uncemented impant were matched to 30424 cemented implants (from a total of 42838) in terms of age, sex and Charlson co-morbidity score.Background
Methods
To report the short to medium term results of acetabular reconstruction using reinforcement/reconstruction ring, morcellised femoral head allograft and cemented metal on metal cup. Single centre retrospective study of 6 consecutive patients who underwent acetabular reconstruction for revision hip surgery. The acetabulum was reconstructed using morcellised femoral head allograft and reinforcement or reconstruction ring fixed with screws. The Birmingham cup – designed for cementless fixation, was Data from our previous in-vitro study had shown good pull out strength of a cemented Birmingham cup.Introduction
Methods
The aim of this study is to report the results of Revision hip arthroplasty using large diameter, metal on metal bearing implants- minimum 2 year follow up. A single centre retrospective study was performed of 22 consecutive patients who underwent acetabular revision surgery using metal on metal bearing implants between 2004 and 2007. Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR) cup was used in all patients - monoblock, uncemented, without additional screws in 16 cases and cemented within reinforcement or reconstruction ring in 6 cases. Femoral revisions were carried out as necessary.Introduction
Methods
Percutaneous K-wire fixation is a well-recognised and often performed method of stabilisation for distal radius fractures. However, there is paucity in the literature regarding the infection rate after percutaneous K-wire fixation for distal radius fractures. To analyse the rate and severity of infection after percutaneous K-wire fixation for distal radius fractures.Background
Aims
