To compare clinical parameters associated with medial parapatellar and midvastus approaches for total knee arthroplasty in the early post-operative period. We present a prospective observational study of 77 patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty using medial parapatellar(40) or midvastus approach(37). The prosthetic design and physical intervention was standardised in all the patents. The Oxford Knee Score, pain scale, knee flexion, unassisted straight leg raise, standing and walking were compared at 3rd, 5th and 7th day post-operatively, then at 6 weeks and at 3 months. The patients and physiotherapist were blinded to the type of approach used. The average age was 67 years (range 42 to 88). There were 42 women and 35 men. The average hospital stay was 7 days (range 2 to 15). There was statistically significant difference in duration of hospital stay, unassisted straight leg raise and standing at 3 days (p=0.001) and pain scale at 5 days, all in favour of midvastus approach. There was no statistically significant difference in Oxford Knee Scores and duration to achieving full flexion and walking. The average duration to achieving straight leg raise for the midvastus group was 5 days and for the medial parapatellar approach group was 8 days.Objective
Methods and results
The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging with that of Stress views of the ankle in testing the integrity of the lateral ankle ligaments. Arthroscopic diagnosis was used as the gold standard. This was a prospective study involving 45 patients who had previous trauma to the ankle and reported symptoms of ankle instability. Our patients were recreational athletes or military patients. These patients had MRI evaluation prior to arthroscopic evaluation and treatment of the ankle. The diagnosis regarding the integrity of the Calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) and the Anterior Talo-fibular ligament (ATFL), as obtained from the MRI was compared against the assessment of integrity from the stress views. These were compared against the assessment made by direct visualisation of the ligaments during arthroscopy. The sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) and accuracy were then calculated.Aim
Methods
