This study describes the method and results of a new way of stabilising painful unstable sternoclavicular joints using the sternocleidomastoid tendon. Painful instability of the sternoclavicular joint is a rare condition whose cause is either of spontaneous onset in young principally females with generalised joint laxity or of traumatic onset. The direction of instability can be anterior, superior or posterior. Surgical stabilisation is difficult and has principally consisted of using periosteum or subclavius and reefing the joint to the first rib with its attendant risks and variable results. We describe eight cases of painful sternoclavicular joint instability treated by using the sternocleidomastoid tendon and passing it through the medial clavicle and onto the manubrium of the sternum to stabilise the joint. This method of treatment is simpler, is reproducible and avoids the potential risks of reefing the joint to the first rib. There is no decrease in function of the sternocleidomastoid muscle from this procedure. All directions of instability can be treated using this tendon by varying the position of the bone hole. The results show comparable outcome for stability with other studies. We conclude that using the sternocleidomastoid tendon to stabilise the sternoclavicular joint is a simpler and safer method of treating these injuries and gives comparable results to the other methods of surgical stabilisation.

The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to identify the true incidence, pattern, and location of the injury and nature of fracture following hand injuries in different paediatric age groups attending a hand unit. Three hundred and sixty children (237 boys and 123 girls) under 16 years of age who presented with hand injuries between 1st April 2000 and 30th September 2000 were included in the study. Bony injuries accounted for 65.5% (236 injuries), 33.3% (120 injuries) were soft tissue injuries. The projected annual incidence rate for skeletal injuries was 418/100,000 children/year. Incidence was low in toddlers (34/100,000), more than doubled in pre-school children (73/100,000) and steeply increased to around 20 fold after the 10th year (663/100,000). Girls had a higher incidence of hand injuries among toddlers and pre-school children. Crushing was the most common cause of hand injury (64%) and most injuries were sustained at home (45%). Toddlers sustained soft tissue injuries predominantly (86%) and older children sustained more bony injuries (77%). Sport was the cause of injures commonly in the older children. There was a higher incidence of fracture in little finger (52%) followed by the thumb (23%). The proximal phalanx was the most frequently fractured bone (67%) among the phalanges. Diaphyseal fractures (46%) were more common in the metacarpal and basal fractures (51%) were common in the phalanges. At discharge more than 80% of the patients felt that they were cured or significantly better. This paper highlights the changing pattern and the different varieties of hand injuries in different paediatric age groups.

Volar wrist ganglion has a different mode of origin and higher complication rate after excision compared to its dorsal counterpart. This study, which is part of the Trent region ganglion audit, was carried out to prospectively evaluate the natural history and treatment outcome for volar wrist ganglia.

Patients were invited to join the study between 1993 and 1995 following initial consultation with either an orthopaedic or plastic surgeon. Questionnaires were sent within the first year, at two years and finally at five to six years. The final review included a Patient Evaluation Measure (PEM) questionnaire.

Of the 234 patients initially consulted, 186 joined the study, 155 of these responded, 122 at final review and 109 at year two. There were 98 females and 57 males. Three patient groups were identified:

Group I: natural history (no intervention) (N=38)

Group II: aspiration/injection (39)

Group III: excision group (78)

In conclusion, over half of volar wrist ganglia disappear without any intervention between 2 to 5 years. About 45% recur whether aspirated or excised. There is a 18% complication rate with excision, but neither aspiration/injection nor leaving them alone with reassurance was associated with any complications. Irrespective of the treatment, about 80% of patients are satisfied at five years, slightly more than at two years.

This information may form a basis for patient information before deciding treatment. It could also help general practitioners advise patients before hospital referral.

A powered, randomised control trial was instigated to evaluate the advantages of subacromial injection of Methylprednisolone over conservative treatment in the management of partial rotator cuff injuries of the shoulder.

Consecutive patients with possible partial rotator cuff tears were reviewed at 1 week. Inclusion criteria for a diagnosis of partial rotator cuff tear included; traumatic mechanism, greater tuberosity tenderness, painful arc, and complete resolution of disability post-Bupivicaine block. Exclusion criteria included; age < 16 years, chronic shoulder disease, acromioclavicular tenderness, and abnormal shoulder radiograph. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either 1 immediate subacromial injection of 40mg Methylprednisolone (group S) or no injection (group N). Initial outcomes measured were; visual analogue pain score (0–10) and active abduction (nearest 5°), repeated at 3, 6, and 12 weeks. All patients were instructed in analgesia usage and given identical shoulder exercises.

Of 279 patients reviewed over 3 years, 90 met the inclusion criteria (6/90 patients were lost to follow-up). 50 patients were randomised to group S, 40 to group N. Mean pain score improvement at 12 weeks was comparable (S=4.95, N=4.44) (p> 0.1, CI=0.16–0.86). In patients aged > 40 years group S had significantly higher mean improvement in abduction at completion (64.28°) compared to group N (34.63°) (p< 0.02, CI 1.29–58.01). Conversely in patients aged < 40 years group S had lower mean improvements in abduction (40.55°) compared to group N (77.73°), though this was not statistically significant (p=0.1, CI 2.06–72.29)

Methylprednisolone injection is more efficacious than conservative treatment alone in some patients. This benefit appears age-dependent and consequently such treatment should be reserved for patients aged > 40 years.