Aim: To determine the quality of life and radiological outcome of the rotating hinge total knee prosthesis as a salvage procedure for failed knee arthroplasty.

Methods: Forty-seven consecutive revision total knee arthroplasties, using the rotating hinge component, implanted between November 1983 and June 1997, were studied. The principal indications for surgery were pain with ligamentous laxity and gross bone loss. There were 43 patients, 11 males, 32 females, 19 left and 28 right, 21 with rheumatoid disease and 22 with osteoarthritis. The mean age at revision was 68 years, mean time from primary procedure to revision of 8 years and a mean number of previous knee procedures of 1.6 (range 1–5). The average time to final follow-up was 5 years. Quality of life was determined using the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) combined with standard clinical and radiological assessment.

Results: Of the 47 revision procedures, full clinical follow-up information was available on 43 (91.5%), radiographic follow-up on 38 (80.9%). Complications occurred in 10 out of the 47 arthroplasties (21.3%) including 4 deep infections, 2 femoral fractures, 2 patients with clinically apparent aseptic loosening and 2 significant extensor mechanism problems. Survivorship analysis revealed a 5year cumulative implant survival of 89%. Significant improvements in quality of life (pain and physical mobility) were shown at 12 months post-operatively.

Discussion: This is a prospectively-studied series of salvage arthroplasty procedures. We regard quality of life as a key indicator of surgical success after knee arthroplasty. Rotating hinge arthroplasty offers objective and reproducible improvement in quality of life for failed knee arthroplasty with ligamentous instability.

Aim: To prospectively determine whether social deprivation has an effect on the level of disability at presentation and the outcome from total knee replacement (TKR).

Method: A prospective outcome study was carried out between 1992 and 1996, recruiting over 2500 total knee replacements. All patients were assessed preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postop using the Knee Society (KS) scores for clinical evaluation and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) to measure general health status. The Townsend Score was used as the index of social deprivation and was calculated for each patient on the basis of their address.

Results: There was no significant difference between either the Knee Society or NHP scores at baseline and the Townsend Score. This indicated that social deprivation has no effect on the level of the knee arthritis immediately prior to joint replacement, both in terms of patient disability and health status.

There was also no significant difference between either the Knee Society or NHP scores postoperatively and the Townsend Score. This indicated that social deprivation has no effect on the outcome from knee replacement.

Conclusion: This study shows that social deprivation has no significant effect on the level of disability at presentation and the outcome from total knee replacement. This is contrary to previously published reports which have shown worse outcomes in more deprived patients.