header advert
Results 141 - 142 of 142
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XIV | Pages 42 - 42
1 Apr 2012
Machak G
Full Access

Aim

Ten years ago at the EMSOS 2000 meeting we have presented our experience concerning the non-surgical treatment of stage IIB osteosarcoma of extremities. The purpose of study was to evaluate long-term results and complications related to this non-standard and controversial treatment modality.

Methods

Since 1988 definitive radiation gamma therapy (RT) in the median dose of 60 Gy was administrated to 36 patients who refused surgery after preoperative chemotherapy. Until 1999 induction consisted in 3-5 cycles of intra-arterial doxorubicin (DOX) 75 mg/m2 or cis-platin (CDDP) 120 mg/m2. Since 2000 induction comprised 4 cycles of DOX 90 mg/m2+CDDP 120 mg/m2 intra-arterially. Tumour response before local treatment was assessed non-invasively by means of X-ray, CT, MRI, angiography, 3-phase bone scans and alkaline phosphatase measurement. The end-points were overall (OS), metastases free (MFS) and local progression free (LPFS) survival at 10 years.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XIV | Pages 51 - 51
1 Apr 2012
Jeys L Cheung W Mottard S Grimer R
Full Access

Introduction

Bone tumours rarely involve the joint surface as cartilage is thought to be a good barrier to tumour spread. When the tumour does cross the surface the surgeon is faced with the dilemma of whether to amputate the limb, resect it without reconstruction or reconstruct with an implant. This paper aims to investigate the oncological and functional outcomes of patients undergoing an extra-articular resection and reconstruction with an endoprosthesis.

Method

3100 patients have been seen in ROH with primary bone tumours. Patients were identified who had an extra-articular resection considered pre-operatively and the notes and imaging was reviewed. This group was subdivided into a group who did have an extra-articular resection (EAR) and those who either had an amputation or traditional through joint resection. The outcomes of the three groups (group 1 = no joint involvement, group 2 = EAR considered but not done and group 3 = EAR) were then compared in terms of oncological outcome, surgical margins and complications.