Abstract
INTRODUCTION
During TKA surgery, the usual goal is to achieve equal balancing between the lateral and medial side, which can be achieved by ligament releases or “pie crusting”. However little is known regarding a relationship between the balancing forces on the medial and lateral plateaus during TKA surgery, and the varus and valgus and rotational laxities when the TKA components are inserted. It seems preferable that the laxity after TKA is the same as for the normal intact knee. Hence the first aim of this study was to compare the laxity envelope of a native knee, with the same knee after TKA surgery. The second aim was to examine the relationship between the Varus-Valgus (VV) laxity and the contact forces on the tibial plateau.
METHODS
A special rig that reproduced surgical conditions and fit onto an operating table was designed (Figure 1) (Verstraete et al. 2015). The rig allows application of a constant varus/valgus moment, and an internal-external (IE) torque. A series of heel push tests under these loading conditions were performed on 12 non-arthritic half semibodies hip-to-toe cadaveric specimens. Five were used for method development. To measure laxities, the flexion angle, the VV and the IE angle were measured using a navigation system. After testing the native knee, a TKA was performed using the Journey II BCS implant, the navigation assuring correct alignments. Soft tissue balancing was achieved by measuring compressive forces on the lateral and medial condyles with an instrumented tibial trial (Orthosensor, Dania Beach, Florida). At completion of the procedure, the laxity tests were repeated for VV and IE rotation and the contact forces on the tibial plateau were recorded, for the full range of flexion.
RESULTS
The average of the varus-valgus and the IE laxity envelope is plotted for the native (yellow), the TKA (pink) and the overlap between the two (orange) (Figure 2). The average for six specimens of the contact force ratio (medial/medial+lateral force) during the varus and valgus test is plotted as a function of the laxity for each flexion angle (Figure 3).
DISCUSSION
The Journey II implant replicated the VV laxity of the native knee except for up to 3 degrees more valgus in high flexion. For the IE, the TKA was equal in internal rotation, but up to 5 degrees more constrained in varus in mid range. Plotting contact force ratio against VV laxity (figure 3), as expected during the varus test the forces were clustered in a 0.85–0.95 ratio, implying predominant medial force with likely lateral lift-off. For the valgus test, the force ratio is more spread out, with all the values below 0.6. This could be due to the different stiffness of the MCL and LCL ligaments which are stressed during the VV test. During both tests the laxity increases progressively with flexion angle. Evidently the geometry knee reproduces more lateral laxity at higher flexion as in the anatomic situation.
For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.
