Abstract
Introduction
This study was performed to investigate the failure mechanism of one specific hip arthroplasty cup design that has shown a high clinical failure rate. The aim of this study was to identify general design problems of this polyethylene inlay.
Material and Methods
55 consecutive retrievals of a cementless screw ring (Mecron) were collected. In any case a 32 mm ceramic head was used. All implants failed due to aseptic loosening. The follow-up of the implants was 3 to 16 years. We recorded backside wear, fatigue of the polyethylene at the flanges on the outer rim and at the cup opening (32 mm inner diameter). To assess the deformation of the inlay, the smallest and the median diameter of the cup opening were measured using a 3 dimensional coordinate measuring machine (Multisensor, Mahr, Germany).
Results
90% of the explants showed signs of wear on the backside of the inlay. Another typical and so far not described alteration was collar fatigue in 68%. 38% of the inlays showed rim creep: Examples for Backside wear, collar fatigue and rim creep are illustrated in Fig. 1. 90% had a diameter of 32.1 mm or less, and even 46% had a diameter less than 32 mm.
Discussion
The investigated design is at the lower limit of the allowed machining tolerance of the cup opening (32 + 0.1 mm) and has no additional clearance (which some manufacturers add). It seems that the inlays yield at the dome because of the viscoelastic properties of polyethylene and the open dome area of the attached screw ring. This leads to excessive wear at the dome area and it triggers a “brake drum” effect at the cup opening. Thereby torsional stresses at the implant bone interface increase which lead to failure of the implant. To avoid this type of failure, PE inlays should have enough clearance at the cup opening and the inlay should have dome contact to the closed metal shell.
