Abstract
Limb reconstruction requires high levels of patient compliance and impacts heavily on social circumstances. The epidemiology and socioeconomic description of trauma patients has been well documented, however no study has assessed the epidemiology of limb reconstruction patients. The aim of this project is to describe patients attending Limb Reconstruction Services (LRS) in order to highlight and address the social implications of their care.
All LRS cases under a single surgeon in a district general hospital were included from 2010 – 2016. Demographics, ASA grade, smoking status, mental health status and employment status were collated. Postcode was converted into an Index of Multiple Deprivation score using GeoConvert® software. Patient socioeconomic status was then ranked into national deprivation score quintiles (quintile 1 is most affluent, quintile 5 is most deprived). Deprivation scores were adjusted by census data and analysed with Student's T-test. The distance from the patient's residence to the hospital was generated through AA route planner®. Patient attendance at clinic and elective or emergency admissions was also assessed. Patient outcomes were not part of this research.
There were 53 patients, of which 66% (n=35) were male, with a mean age of 45 years (range 21–89 years). Most patients were smokers (55%, n=29), 83% (n=42) were ASA 1 or 2 (there were no ASA 4 patients). The majority of indications were for acute trauma (49%), chronic complications of trauma (32%), congenital deformity (15%) and salvage fusion (4%). Mental health issues affected 23% (n=12) of cases and 57% of working-aged patients were unemployed. Mental health patients had a higher rate of trauma as an indication than the rest of the cohort (93% vs. 76%). Deprivation quintiles identified that LRS patients were more deprived (63% in quintiles 4 and 5 vs. 12% of 1 and 2), but this failed to reach statistical significance (p=0.9359). The mean distance from residence to hospital was 12 miles (range 0.35–105 miles, median 7 miles). The patients derived from a large region made up of 12 local authorities. There was a mean of 17 individual LRS clinic attendances per patient (range: 3–42). Cumulative distance travelled for each patient during LRS treatment was a mean of 495 miles (range 28 – 2008 miles). The total distance travelled for all 53 patients was over 26,000 miles.
The results largely mirror the findings of trauma demographic and socioeconomic epidemiology, due to the majority of LRS indications being post-traumatic in this series. The high rates of unemployment and mental health problems may be a risk factor for requiring LRS management, or may be a product of the treatment. Clinicians may want to consider a social care strategy alongside their surgical strategy and fully utilise their broader MDT to address the social inequalities in these patients. This strategy should include a mental health assessment, smoking cessation therapy, sign-posted support for employment circumstances and a plan for travel to the hospital. The utilisation and cost of ambulance services was not possible with this methodology. Further work should prospectively assess the changes in housing circumstances, community healthcare needs and whether there was a return to employment and independent ambulation at the end of treatment.
