Abstract
Introduction
Revision total knee arthroplasy (TKA) has been often used with a metal block augmentation for patients with poor bone quality. However, bone resorption beneath metal block augmentation has been still reported and little information about the reasons of the occurrence of bone resorption is available. The aim of the current study is to identify a possibility of the potential occurrence of bone resorption beneath metal block augmentation, through evaluation of strain distribution beneath metal block augmentation in revision TKA with metal block augmentation, during high deep flexion.
Materials and Method
LOSPA, revision TKA with a metal block augmentation (Baseplate size #5, Spacer size #5, Stem size Φ9, L30, Augment #5 T5) was considered in this study. For the test, the tibia component of LOSPA was implanted to the tibia sawbone (left, #3401, Sawbones EuropeAB, Malmö, Sweden), which was corresponded to a traditional TKR surgical guideline. The femoral component of LOSPA was mounted to a customized jig attached to the Instron 8872 (Instron, Norwood, MA, USA), which was designed specially to represent the angles ranged from 0° to 140° with consideration of a rollback of knee joint (Figure. 1). Here, a compressive load of 1,600N (10N/s) was applied for each angle. Strain distribution was then measured from rossete strain gauge (Half Bridge type, CAS, Seoul, Korea) together (Figure 1).
Results and Discussions
The strain distribution on the cortical bone of the tibia was shown in Figure 2. The results showed that the strains on the posterior region were gradually increased from extension to high deep of the knee joint and generally larger than the other regions. In contrast to the results on the posterior region, the strains on the medial region were gradually decreased after 60° or 90° flexion position and relatively lower than the other regions. Particularly, the strains on the medial region were generally lower than 50–100 µstrain, which is known as critical value range able to inducing bone resorption, during high deep flexion. This fact indicate that a possibility of the potential bone resorption occurrence in revision TKA used with a metal block augmentation may be relatively increased in patients who are frequently exposed to a personal lifestyle history with the loading conditions of the high flexion. This study may be valuable by identifying for the first time a possibility of the potential bone resorption occurrence through evaluation of the strain distribution beneath metal block augmentation in revision TKA used with a metal block augmentation during high deep flexion.
Conclusion
A possibility of the potential bone resorption occurrence in revision TKA used with a metal block augmentation may be dependent on loading patterns applied on the knee joint related to personal lifestyle history. Particularly, it may be relatively increased in patients who are frequently exposed to a personal lifestyle history with the loading conditions of the high flexion.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by a grant from the New Technology Product Evaluation Technical Research project, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS), Republic of Korea
