Abstract
Rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) may not restore normal hip range of motion (ROM) due to the inherent deformity of the hip and it may lead to femoro-acetabular impingement. The purpose of this study was to investigate morphological factors of the pelvis and femur influencing on simulated ROM after RAO with a fixed target for femoral head coverage. We retrospectively reviewed CT images of 52 DDHs with an average lateral centre edge angle (CEA) of 7.9° (−12° to 19°). After virtual RAO with 30° of lateral CEA and 55° of anterior CEA producing femoral head coverage similar to that of the normal hips, we measured simulated flexion ROM using pelvic and femoral computer models reconstructed from the CT images. Pelvic sagittal inclination, acetabular anteversion, lateral CEA, femoral neck anteversion, femoral neck shaft angle (FNSA), alpha angle and the position of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) were investigated as morphological factor. When the most prominent point of the AIIS existed more distally than the cranial tip of the acetabular joint line in a lateral view of the pelvis model in supine position, the subjects were defined as AIIS-Type1; the remaining subjects were defined as Type 2. There were 10 hips with Type 1 and 42 hips with Type 2 AIIS. The Kappa value of inter-observer reproducibility to classify AIIS was 0.82. Multiple regression analyses were performed to analyse the relationship between ROM and the morphological parameters. We also analysed the relationship between the probability of flexion ROM being less than 110° and the factors which influenced on flexion ROM. FNSA and AIIS-Type independently influenced on simulated flexion ROM after RAO (standard regression coefficient: −0.51 and 0.37, respectively. p< 0.001). The multiple correlation coefficient was 0.68. Flexion ROM after RAO with a fixed femoral head coverage similar to that of the normal hips ranged from 95° to 141° with an average of 121°±8°. The probability of ROM being less than 110° was significantly higher in subjects with AIIS-Type 1 than in those with Type 2 (odds ratio: 13.3, p<0.01). It was also significantly higher in subjects with more than 135° of FNSA than in those with less than 135° of FNSA (odds ratio: 9.5, p<0.05). FNSA and the type of AIIS influenced on flexion ROM after RAO with approximately 40° of variation in spite of a fixed target for femoral head coverage. A large FNSA and a distal positioning of AIIS were independently associated with smaller flexion ROM after RAO.
