Abstract
Introduction
Using the tibial extramedullary guide needs meticulous attention to accurately align the tray in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We previously reported the risk for varus tray alignment if the anteroposterior (AP) axis of the ankle was used for the rotational direction of the guide. The purpose of our study was to determine whether aligning the rotational direction of the guide to the AP axis of the proximal tibia reduced the incidence of varus tray alignment when compared to aligning the rotational direction of the guide to the AP axis of the ankle.
Materials and Methods
Clinical Study
A total of 80 osteoarthritis (OA) knees after posterior stabilized TKA were recruited in this study. From 2002 to 2004, the rotational alignment of the guide was adjusted to the AP axis of the ankle (Method A: Figure 1, N = 40 knees). After 2005, the rotational alignment of the guide was adjusted to the AP axis of the proximal tibia (Method B: Figure 1, N = 40 knees). The AP axis of the proximal tibia was defined as the line connecting the middle of the attachment of the PCL and the medial third border of the attachment of the patellar tendon. The guide was set at a level of 10 mm distal to the lateral articular surface. Postoperative alignment was compared between the two groups using full-lengthanteroposterior radiograph.
Computer simulation
Computer simulation was performed to determine the effect of ankle rotation on tibial tray alignment, using three-dimensional bone and skin model reconstructed from CT images of 75 OA knees (Figure 2). The position of the distal end of the guide in Method B was evaluated on the coronal plane perpendicular to the AP axis of the proximal tibia and of the ankle respectively. <Displacement> was the distance from the distal end of the guide to the midpoint-malleolar points (+: medial position). <Distance ratio> was the ratio of <Displacement> dividing by the entire width of the malleolar.
Results
The results of the postoperative alignment for both methods from the clinical study are shown in Table 1. The number of the knees with more than 3 degrees of varus aligned tibial component significantly decreased with the Method B from the Method A. The computer simulation showed that the position of the guide varied great among individuals in the direction of the AP axis of the ankle joint.
Discussion
When an extramedullary alignment guide is used in TKA, a rotational mismatch between the proximal part of the tibia and the ankle joint can induce a varus alignment of the tibial component. Computer simulation also supported our conclusion that the surgeon should not evaluate the distal end of the guide in the direction of the ankle joint to minimize the effects of anatomic variation for proper coronal alignment.
