Abstract
Achieving optimal acetabular cup orientation in Total Hip Replacement (THR) remains one of the most difficult challenges in THR surgery (AAOR 2013) but very little has been added to useful understanding since Lewinnek published recommendations in 1978. This is largely due to difficulties of analysis in functional positions. The pelvis is not a static reference but rotates especially in the sagittal plane depending upon the activity being performed. These dynamic changes in pelvic rotation have a substantial effect on the functional orientation of the acetabulum, not appreciated on standard radiographs [Fig1].
Studies of groups of individuals have found the mean pelvic rotation in the sagittal plane is small but large individual variations commonly occur. Posterior rotation, with sitting, increases the functional arc of the hip and is protective of a THR in regards to both edge loading and risk of dislocation. Conversely Anterior rotation, with sitting, is potentially hazardous.
We developed a protocol using three functional positions – standing, supine and flexed seated (posture at “seat-off” from a standard chair). Lateral radiographs were used to define the pelvic tilt in the standing and flexed seated positions. Pelvic tilt was defined as the angle between a vertical reference line and the anterior pelvic plane (defined by the line joining both anterior superior iliac spines and the pubic symphysis). In the supine position pelvic tilt was defined as the angle between a horizontal reference line and the anterior pelvic plane. Supine pelvic tilt was measured from computed tomography.
Proprietary software (Optimized Ortho, Sydney) based on Rigid Body Dynamics then modelled the patients’ dynamics through their functional range producing a patient-specific simulation which also calculates the magnitude and direction of the dynamic force at the hip and traces the contact area between prosthetic head/liner onto a polar plot of the articulating surface, Fig 2. Given prosthesis specific information edge-loading can then be predicted based on the measured distance of the contact patch to the edge of the acetabular liner.
Delivery of desired orientation at surgery is facilitated by use of a solid 3D printed model of the acetabulum along with a patient specific guide which fits the model and the intra-operative acetabulum (with cartilage but not osteophytes removed) - an incorporated laser pointer then marks a reference point for the reamer and cup inserter to replicate the chosen orientation.
Results and conclusions
The position of the pelvis in the sagittal plane changes significantly between functional activities. The extent of change is specific to each patient. Spinal pathology is a potent “driver” of pelvic sagittal rotation, usually unrecognised on standard radiographs. Pre-operative patient assessment can identify potential orientation problems and even suitability for hard on hard bearings.
Optimal cup orientation is likely patient-specific and requires an evaluation of functional pelvic dynamics to pre-operatively determine the target angles.
Post-operatively this technique can identify patient and implant factors likely to be causing edge loading leading to early failure in metal on metal bearings or squeaking in ceramic on ceramic bearings.
