Abstract
Introduction
Epidemiologic studies indicate that isolated patellofemoral (PF) arthritis affects nearly 10% of the population over 40 years of age, with a predilection for females. A small percentage of patients with PF arthritis may require surgical intervention. Surgical options include non-arthroplasty procedures (arthroscopic debridement, tibial tubercle unloading procedures, cartilage restoration, and patellectomy), and patellofemoral or total knee arthroplasty (PFA or TKA). Historically, non-arthroplasty surgical treatment has provided inconsistent results, with short-term success rates of 60–70%, especially in patients with advanced arthritis. Although TKA provides reproducible results in patients with isolated PF arthritis, it may be undesirable for those interested in a more conservative, kinematic-preserving approach, particularly in younger patients, who may account for nearly 50% of patients undergoing surgery for PF arthritis. Due to these limitations, patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) has become utilised more frequently over the past two decades.
Indications for PFA
The ideal candidate for PFA has isolated, non-inflammatory PF arthritis resulting in “anterior” pain and functional limitations. Pain should be retro- and/or peri-patellar and exacerbated by descending stairs/hills, sitting with the knee flexed, kneeling and standing from a seated position. There should be less pain when walking on level ground. Symptoms should be reproducible during physical examination with squatting and patellar inhibition testing. An abnormal Q-angle or J-sign indicate significant maltracking and/or dysplasia, particularly with a previous history of patellar dislocations. The presence of these findings may necessitate concomitant realignment surgery with PFA. Often, patients with PF arthritis will have significant quadriceps weakness, which should be treated with preoperative physical therapy to prevent prolonged postoperative pain and functional limitations. Tibiofemoral joint pain suggests additional pathology, which may not be amenable to PFA alone.
Conclusion
PFA is effective for the treatment of arthritis localised to the PF compartment. Outcomes can be optimised with proper patient selection, meticulous surgical technique, and selection of an onlay-style implant that can be positioned perpendicular to the AP axis of the femur. Minimizing the risk of patellar instability by using onlay-design PFAs has enhanced mid- and long-term results, and leaves progressive tibiofemoral arthritis as the primary failure mechanism beyond 10–15 years.
