Abstract
The absence of menisci in the knee leads to early degenerative changes. Complete radial tears of the meniscus are equivalent to total meniscectomy and repair should be performed if possible. The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare the cross suture, hashtag and crosstag meniscal repairs using all-inside implants for radial tears.
Radial tears were created at the mid-body of 36 fresh-frozen lateral human menisci and then repaired, in randomiSed order, with Fast-Fix™ 360s (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA) using the cross suture, hashtag and crosstag techniques. The repaired menisci were tested using an Instron Electropuls E10000 (Instron, Norwood, MA). The tests consisted of cyclic loading from 5 to 30N at 1Hz for 500 cycles, then a load to failure test. Displacement following cyclic loading, load at 3mm of displacement, load to failure, and stiffness were recorded. Any differences between repairs were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney tests (p<0.05).
Cross suture repairs displaced more following cyclic loading and resisted less load to failure than both the hashtag and crosstag repairs. However, these differences were not statistically significant. The average displacement following cyclic loading of cross suture, hashtag, and crosstag repairs was 4.34 mm (±2.02 mm), 3.46 mm (±2.12 mm), and 3.24 mm (±1.52 mm) respectively (p=0.33). Maximal load to failure was 64.83 N (±17.41 N), 74.52 N (±9.03 N), and 74.98N (±10.50N), respectively (p=0.419).
All-inside cross suture, hashtag and crosstag repairs all displaced >3mm with cyclic loading, which is the threshold for meniscal insufficiency. This contrasts previous studies using inside-out sutures, where crosstag and hashtag repairs resisted cyclic loading (< 3mm). Inside-out suturing for radial tears of the lateral meniscus currently remains the gold standard.
