Abstract
There are a variety of sizes currently available for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) implant systems. Common sizing options include a smaller 36 to 38 mm or a larger 40 to 42 mm glenosphere, and are typically selected based on surgeon preference or patient size. Previous studies have only evaluated the abduction and adduction range of motion within a single plane of elevation, providing a limited view of the joint's possible range of motion. The purpose of this study was to use computer modeling to evaluate the abduction and adduction range of motion across multiple planes of elevation for a range of glenosphere sizes.
Computed tomography images of four cadaveric specimens (age: 54 ± 24 years) were used to obtain the osseous anatomy to be utilised in the model. Solid-body motion studies of the RTSA models were constructed with varying glenosphere diameters of 33, 36, 39, 42, and 45 mm in Solidworks (Dassault Systems, US). The implant components were scaled, while maintaining a consistent centre of rotation. Simulations encompassing the full range of abduction and adduction were conducted for the planes of elevation between −15˚ and 135˚ at 15˚ intervals, with the motion of the humerus being constrained in neutral internal-external rotation throughout all planes. Angles of elevation were obtained utilising the humeral long axis and the RTSA centre of rotation. Statistical analysis was performed using repeated measures ANOVA.
Glenosphere diameter was found to significantly affect the adduction range of motion (p=0.043), in which the largest size provided approximately 17˚ more adduction range of motion than the smallest. However, abduction range of motion was not found to be significantly affected through the alteration of glenosphere size (p=0.449). The plane of elevation was not found to significantly affect abduction or abduction (p=0.585 & p=0.225, respectively).
Increasing glenosphere diameter resulted in an increased adduction range of motion when averaged across the tested planes of elevation; however the observed influence on abduction was not significant. These are similar to the trends observed in the previous single plane of elevation studies. These findings illustrate the importance of implant sizing related to range of motion. Further studies are required to determine the influence of glenosphere size on internal and external range of motion.
