Abstract
Introduction
Recently, computer-aided orthopaedic surgery has enabled three dimensional (3D) preoperative planning, navigation systems and patient matched instrument, and they provide good clinical results in total knee arthroplasty. However, the preoperative planning methods and the criteria in total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) still have not sufficiently established due to the uncertainty of 3D anatomical geometry of the elbow joints. In order to clarify the 3D anatomical geometry, this study measured 3D bone models of the normal elbow joints. Additionally this study attempted to apply the 3D preoperative planning to ordinary surgery. Then the postoperative position of implant has evaluated as compared with the position in 3D preoperative planning.
Methods
Three dimensional bone measurements on 4 normal cases were performed. Three dimensional bone models were constructed with CT image using Bone Viewer®(ORTHREE Co., Ltd.). TEA was performed with FINE® Total Elbow System (Nakashima Medical Co., Ltd.) for 3 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cases (Fig. 1). Three dimensional preoperative planning was based on this bone measurement, and postoperative position of implant were evaluated. The postoperative assessments were evaluated by superimposing preoperative planning image on postoperative CT image using Bone Simulator® (ORTHREE Co., Ltd.). This study only covers humeral part.
Results
The results of 3D bone measurements on 4 normal cases shows the average internal rotation angle between the flexion-extension axis and the epicondyles axis in the distal humerus was 2.2 degrees. The average valgus tilt of the distal humerus was 3.7 degrees. Postoperative position of humeral component for 3 RA cases was installed at proximal and valgus position compared to the preoperative planning.
Discussion
This study indicates that ordinary two dimensional criteria and 3D anatomical one in the elbow joint may be different in several bony landmarks such as rotation, varus and valgus. Additionally these results show the differences between postoperative position of implant and preoperative position in 3D planning. More studies need to be conducted to validate postoperative evaluation and preoperative planning.
