Abstract
Introduction
Hip replacements are falling short of matching the life expectancy of coxarthritis patients, due to implanting THR in younger patients and due to increasingly active patients. The most frequently implanted hip prostheses use cross linked (XL) polyethylene (PE) on metal bearings in the USA and most of the Western world. Concerns remain in the long term around the potential of wear debris-induced aseptic loosening. Thus exploring lower-wearing alternative bearings remains a major research goal.
PEEK (poly-ether-ether-ketone) is a thermoplastic polymer with enhanced mechanical properties. This study compared the wear of PEEK to the wear of cross linked polyethylene, when sliding against cobalt chrome (CoCr) metallic counterfaces, and compared the wear of carbon-fibre reinforced (CFR)-PEEK to cross linked polyethylene when sliding against metallic and ceramic counterfaces under different contact stresses within the hip joint.
Methods
The following materials were studied: unfilled PEEK (OPTIMA, Invibio) and CFR-PEEK (MOTIS, Invibio) against either high carbon (HC) CoCr or Biolox Delta ceramic plates. The comparative control material was a moderately cross-linked PE (Marathon, DePuy Synthes).
A simple geometry wear study was undertaken. A rotational motion of ±30° across a sliding distance of ±28 mm (cross shear of 0.087), and contact pressures of 1.6 or 4 MPa were applied. The lubricant was 25% (v/v) bovine serum and the wear test was conducted for 1 million cycles at 1 Hz. Wear was assessed gravimetrically. A validated soak control method was used to adjust for serum absorption-induced mass changes during the wear test. Surface profilometry was assessed pre and post wear test.
Results
Unfilled PEEK produced a six-fold higher wear factor than XL PE against HC Co Cr (p value <0.0001). CFR-PEEK vs. Biolox Delta produced a two-fold lower wear factor than XL PEvs. HC Co Cr (p value = 0.003). CFR-PEEK vs. Biolox Delta had the lowest wear factor among all studied combinations. The wear of CFR-PEEK vs. HC CoCr was higher than XL PEvs. HC CoCr (Figure 1).
The counterface surfaces were scratched when articulating against CFR-PEEK. This was more evident on CoCr plates, with the average surface roughness increasing from 0.005 µm to 0.32 µm (p value = 0.0048). This might explain the accelerated wear in the CFR-PEEK vs. HC CoCr combinations.
Higher contact pressures led to a 30 % reduction in the wear factor of CFR-PEEK vs. Biolox Delta combination (p value = 0.048), while no significant impact was noted against HC CoCr (Figure 2).
Conclusions
The injection moulded carbon fibre reinforced PEEK vs. Biolox Delta ceramic generated significantly lower wear compared with XL PE (even under higher contact pressures). CFR-PEEK vs. Biolox Delta may lead to longer lasting hip replacements, and will be the subject of further investigations.
