Abstract
There are numerous benefits of femoral head/neck modularity in both primary and revision surgery. Taper corrosion necessitating revision surgery was recognised decades ago, and there are concerns that the incidence is increasing. Variables in design, manufacturing, biomechanics, and modular head assembly have all been implicated. While the incidence of clinically significant taper corrosion is unknown, the adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) does not appear to occur absent a cobalt chromium interface.
The utilization of ceramic heads has increased in recent years. Domestically, more than 50% of femoral heads are now ceramic. This is due, at least in part, to a reduction in patient age at the time of surgery. A stronger influence, however, may be the concern for an adverse local tissue reaction (ALTR) due to taper corrosion with a cobalt chromium femoral head. Ceramic heads have a small risk of in-vivo fracture and cost more. Compared to cobalt chromium alloy, ceramic femoral heads wear less against UHMWPE, although the reduction may not be clinically significant when paired with a crosslinked polyethylene. In the Australian National Joint Replacement Registry, of the five bearing combinations with 14-year cumulative percent revision (CPR) data, the lowest is metal femoral heads with crosslinked polyethylene (5.4%).
In-vivo taper assembly technique is variable and can play a role in clinical success or failure, regardless of the head material: taper corrosion with cobalt chromium heads, or fracture of ceramic heads. Standardization of head-neck taper assembly is desirable.
