Abstract
Introduction
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a commonly performed surgical procedure for the treatment of hip arthritis. Approximately 50,000 THAs are performed annually in Canada. The costs incurred to the healthcare system are tremendous, amounting to anywhere between 4.3 and 7.3 billion dollars each year. Despite the substantial financial burden of THA to the Canadian healthcare system, few studies have provided accurate cost estimations of this procedure.
Purpose
To determine the impact of surgical approach on costs of THA from a hospital perspective, and provide an updated cost estimation of THA within a publically funded healthcare system.
Methods
We recruited patients undergoing a THA through an anterior, posterior, or lateral approach for study participation. A single surgeon was designated to perform every case using the surgical approach of their expertise. Each patient received standardized implants: a collared, hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless femoral stem (Corail TM stem, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., Warsaw, IN), a cementless acetabular cup (Pinnacle Sector II TM acetabular cup, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., Warsaw, IN), a highly cross-linked polyethylene liner (AltrX TM polyethylene liner, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., Warsaw, IN), and a cobalt chrome femoral head (Articul/eze TMcobalt chrome, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc., Warsaw, IN). We prospectively recorded costs of operating room time, length of stay in hospital, and medical and surgical interventions using a micro-costing method. Group comparisons were performed using Pearson's Chi-square and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), with post-hoc testing when necessary. All costs were reported in 2013 Canadian dollars.
Results
One-hundred and eighteen patients (40 anterior, 38 posterior, and 40 lateral) completed the study. All three groups were similar with regards to age (p=0.79), sex (p=0.97), and body mass index (p=0.54). Mean operating room time was significantly shorter for the lateral (49.0 minutes, 95%CI 46.5 – 51.5) versus anterior (69.3 minutes, 95%CI 66.0 – 72.6, p<0.001) and posterior approach (61.6 minutes, 95%CI 57.5 – 65.5, p<0.001). Mean length of stay was shorter for the anterior (33.9 hours, 95%CI 29.6 – 38.2) compared to the posterior (65.8 hours, 95%CI 56.8 – 74.8, p<0.001) and lateral approach (64.2 hours, 95%CI 56.7 – 71.7, p<0.001). The operating room costs were significantly higher for the anterior versus posterior (p=0.008) and lateral approach (p<0.001, figure 1). The total inpatient costs were significantly for the anterior versus posterior and lateral approach (p<0.001 for both pair-wise comparisons, figure 2). Total costs were significantly less for the anterior ($7300.22, 95%CI 7064.49 – 7535.95) versus posterior ($8287.46, 95%CI 7906.41 – 8668.51, p<0.001) and lateral approach ($7853.10, 95%CI 7577.29 – 8128.91, p=0.031).
Discussion / Conclusion
Total costs for THA were significantly less when performed using an anterior approach. A reduction in hospital length of stay contributed significantly to an overall reduction in costs from a hospital perspective. Future analyses will determine the cost-effectiveness of the anterior approach from both a hospital and societal perspective.
