Abstract
Ambulating children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (BSCP) demonstrate atypical posture and gait due to abnormal muscle and skeletal growth when compared to typically–developing (TD) children. Normal postural alignment in standing facilitates many of the tasks of daily living because it allows a stable base of support without requiring significant muscular effort. Similarly, increasing gait abnormality is associated with poorer functional capacity. Our aims were to compare the standing posture of TD children and children with BSCP using the Standing Profile Score and identify if any abnormality in standing is correlated with abnormality in walking in children with BSCP using the Gait Profile Score index.
We retrospectively compared 44 typically-developing children to 74 age-matched children with BSCP (GMFCS I & II). We performed 3D Gait Analysis during long-standing (10seconds) and in gait after application of 16 retro-reflective markers on anatomical landmarks of the lower limb and pelvis. Analysis of all kinematics was performed for movements in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes. The Gait Profile score (GPS) is a validated index of overall gait pathology. The Standing Profile Score (SPS) was developed using the same calculations for GPS but during static trials.
A significant correlation was observed between the Standing Profile Score (SPS) and Gait Profile Score (GPS) in children with BSCP (p<0.001). Significant differences were exhibited in GPS between the two groups, across all parameters, except the pelvic obliquity (p<0.05). A significant positive correlation existed for hip rotation in both groups, however the correlations observed at hip flexion and ankle dorsiflexion were significantly greater in the BSCP group compare to the TD group (p<0.01).
We have shown that posture during gait (GPS) is predictable from standing posture (SPS) in patients with BSCP. This biomechanical relationship can aid surgical decision-making.
