Abstract
Background:
Lower limb reconstruction is performed in trauma centres where uplifted tariffs support the treatment of severely injured patients. Calculation of Healthcare Resource Groups (HRG4) codes is affected by the accuracy of clinical coding, determining the financial viability of this service in a district general hospital (DGH).
Methods:
A prospective review of coding was performed for 17 sequential patients treated using ring fixation. Relevant clinical codes and HRG4 tariffs were obtained, allowing comparison with operation notes (including pertinent diagnostic information) and implant costs. Hexapod and paediatric cases were excluded.
Results:
Mean implant costs were £3,300 and mean tariffs were £9,300. However, the tariffs for the care episodes which did not attract a code for ‘reconstruction’ were lower, averaging £4,300. Clinical outcomes were comparable to published literature. No uplift was received.
Discussion:
Despite attempts to avoid mis-coding for the fledgling service and factoring ancillary costs of patient care, the ring fixation procedures which resulted in HRG4 codes other than those for limb reconstruction cost the trust more than it received.
Conclusion:
Lower limb reconstruction is barely financially viable even when coding is carefully performed. It is financially easier for this Trust to transfer patients to a trauma centre.
