Abstract
Component and limb alignment are important considerations during Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). Three-dimensional positioning of TKA implants has an effect on implant loosening, polyethylene stresses, and gait. Furthermore, alignment, in conjunction with other implant and patient variables such as body mass index (BMI) influence osseous loading and failure rates. Fortunately, implant survivorship after TKA has been reported to be greater than 95% at 20 years, despite up to 28% of TKAs having component position greater than 3 degrees from neutral. How good are we at positioning TKA implants with standard instrumentation? Ritter, et al examined 6,070 primary TKAs and found that from 2 degrees – 7 degrees of valgus, the failure rate was 0.5% for limb alignment. Importantly 28% of the TKAs were outside the 2 degrees – 7 degrees range in the hands of experienced surgeons. What about cases with retained hardware or deformities that preclude IM or EM guides.
Clearly there is room for improvement in surgical technique, but this improvement must be (1) time efficient and cost effective; (2) have a low complication rate, and (3) be reproducible with a minimal learning curve. One of the technologies that has been developed to help surgeons implant and position TKA components is a patient matched guide. Preoperative computerised planning of the arthroplasty, development of patient specific guides, combined with limited mechanical instruments has been a significant step forward for the surgeon and patient.
“The logistical benefits include possible decreased operating room time, decreased turnover time, less time spent sterilising and preparing trays, less inventory, less strain on surgical technicians and nurses, and no capital cost associated with computer navigation. Patient benefits include potentially less tourniquet time, less surgical exposure, no requirement of intramedullary canal preparation, and improved mechanical alignment, which may translate to increased implant longevity. Surgeon benefits include potentially more accurate landmark registration than computer navigation, more efficient surgery, decreased intraoperative stress due to less required decision making, and the ability to perform more surgeries due to time saved.”
Ng, et al compared 569 TKAs performed with patient-specific positioning guides and 155 with manual instruments. The overall mean hip-knee-ankle angle for patient-specific positioning guides (180.6 degrees) was similar to manual instrumentation (181.1 degrees), but there were fewer ± 3 degrees hip-knee-ankle angle outliers with patient-specific positioning guides (9%) than with manual instrumentation (22%).
