Abstract
There has been a trend towards operative management of pelvic injuries. Posterior pelvic integrity is more important for functional recovery. Percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation is being increasingly preferred for posterior pelvic stabilisation. Outcome reporting for this procedure remains inconsistent and un-standardised.
Retrospectively, all percutaneous iliosacral screw fixations done at this institute during a 5-year period (2008–2012) were reviewed. 28 patients, who had had at least 12 months follow-up, were contacted and clinical scoring was done by postal correspondence. Radiographs were measured for displacements and leg-length discrepancy. Possible factorial associations and correlations were investigated.
Mean Majeed score was 83 (median 87), mean EQ-Visual Analog Score (EQ-VAS) was 75.5 (median 80) and the two scores were correlated with statistical significance. Tile AO type C injuries produced worse outcomes and patients who'd anterior pelvic fixation did better.
Our results show high patient-reported outcomes, excellent radiologically measured reductions and unions. The incidence of complications is very low. There is a significant correlation between the EQ-VAS arm of the EQ5D instrument and the Majeed score in this patient population. Incidence of non-pelvic surgical procedures in these patients was significantly associated with worse outcomes. Leg length discrepancies appeared to increase after patients were fully weight bearing.
