Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

Foot & Ankle

Minimally invasive calcaneal osteotomy; a safe alternative to open calcaneal osteotomy with fewer complications

British Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (BOFAS)



Abstract

Background:

Calcaneal osteotomy is an established technique in correcting hind foot deformity. Patients have traditionally received an open osteotomy through Atkins lateral approach. In order to reduce the rate of wound complications associated with the Atkins approach, a minimally invasive surgical (MIS) technique has been adopted since 2011. This uses a low-speed, high-torque burr to perform the same osteotomy under radiographic guidance. The results of the new MIS technique, including post-operative complication rates, are compared to the standard open approach.

Methods:

The safety of the new MIS technique was investigated by conducting a case controlled study on all patients who underwent displacement calcaneal osteotomy at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford from 2008 to 2014. The primary outcome measure was 30 day post-operative complication rate. Secondary outcome measures included operating time, duration of stay, fusion rates and amount of displacement achieved.

Results:

82 patients underwent calcaneal osteotomy as part of their corrective surgery; 50 patients in the Open approach group and 32 patients in MIS group. The average age at the time of surgery was 47.7 years (range 16–77) for the Open group and 48.5 (range 21–77) in the MIS group. A mean calcaneal displacement of 8.0mm (s.d. 1.32, 7 to 11 mm) and 8.33mm (s.d.1.53, 6 to 10 mm) was achieved through the MIS and open approaches respectively. There were significantly fewer wound complications in the MIS group (6.25%) compared to the Open group (28%, P=0.021) and the MIS group was associated with significantly lower rates of wound infection (3% versus 20%, P = 0.043). Three patients in the Open group experienced sural peripheral neuropathy.

Conclusions:

MIS calcaneal osteotomy was found to be a safe technique. It was as effective as calcaneal osteotomy performed through an open lateral approach but was associated with significantly fewer wound complications and fewer nerve complications.