Abstract
Background
The distal part of the radius is the most common localisation of fractures of the human body. Dislocated intraarticular fractures of the distal radius (FDR) are frequently treated by open reduction and internal fixation with a volar locking plate (VLP) under fluoroscopic guidance. Typically the locking screws are placed subchondral near the joint line to achieve maximum stability of the osteosynthesis. To avoid intraarticular screw placement an intraoperative virtual implant planning system (VIPS) as an application for mobile C-arms was established. The aim of the study was the validation of the implemented VIPS comparing the intraoperative planning with the actual placement of the screws. The study was conducted as a single-centre randomised controlled trial in a primary care institution. The hypothesis of the study was that there is conformity between the virtual implant position and the real implant placement.
Patients/Material and Methods
30 patients with FDR type A3, C1 and C2 according to the AO-classification were randomised in two treatment groups and allocated either in the conventional or in the VIPS group in which the patients underwent an intraoperative planning before screw placement. The randomisation was performed on the basis of a computer-generated code. After fracture reduction an initial diaphyseal fixation of the plate was done. Then the matching of the three-dimensional virtual plate with the image of the real plate in the fluoroscopy shots in two planes was performed automatically. The implant placement was planned intraoperatively in terms of orientation, angulation and length of the screws. After the placement of four or five locking screws the implant position was verified with an intraoperative three-dimensional mobile C-arm scan. The locking screws near the joint line were examined and compared in relation to the actual and the planned inclination angle, the azimuth angle which is determined analogue to a compass rose and the screw-tip distance. The planned and actual parameters of the locking screws were then statistically analysed applying the Shapiro-Wilk - and the Students t-test.
Results
15 patients with FDR were treated in the VIPS arm. In the VIPS group six fractures type A3 one type C1 and eight type C2 were included. The control group showed a similar fracture distribution with six type A3 and nine type C2 fractures. The discrepancy between the actual and the planned screw-tip distance was 2,24 ± 0,97 mm and did not differ significantly (p>0,05). The angle of the planned and actual screw placement also did not vary significantly (p>0,05). The difference of the actual to the planned azimut angle accounted for 18,69°± 29,84. The planned and real inclination of the screws differed by 1,66° ± 4,46.
Conclusion
The analysis shows that the screws were almost placed as planned. Differences between actual and planned placement of the screws were observed but were not statistically significant. Therefore the hypothesis of the study can be accepted. We assume, that the precise planning of the screw placement in FDR with VIPS can be transported into the surgical treatment.
