Abstract
Aim
To determine the preferable treatment for congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia, we retrospectively reviewed 19 patients (20 limbs) treated consecutively over a 22 year period (1988–2007). Fifteen were followed up to maturity. The patients were assessed for union, leg length discrepancy (LLD), ankle valgus, range of ankle movement and distal tibial physeal injury.
Results
The median age at surgery was 3 years. At surgery nineteen of the tibiae had a dysplastic constriction with a fracture (Crawford II-C or Boyd II) lesion.
To obtain union in the 20 tibiae, 29 procedures were done. Nine failed primarily and required a second procedure to obtain union. Older patients (≥ 5 years) had a significantly higher success rate.
Excision, intramedullary rodding and bone graft (IMR) was done in 14 tibiae: 10 (71.4%) were successful. Six of 10 primary operations and all 4 secondary operations after a previous failed procedure were successful.
Ipsilateral vascularized fibula transfer (IVFT) was successful in 5 tibiae (3 primary and 2 secondary). Ilizarov with bone transport only, failed in two patients. Ilizarov with excision, intramedullary rodding and bone graft with lengthening was successful in 2 of 5 cases (40%); two sustained fractures at the proximal lengthening site.
A median leg length discrepancy (LLD) of 3 cms occurred post surgery which was treated with contralateral epiphysiodesis. At maturity 3 patients had a LLD of ≥ 2cms. Six limbs had ankle valgus and were treated with stapling and tibio-fibular syndesmosis. Decreased range of movement of the ankle (< 50%) occurred in 7 patients. Distal tibial physeal injury occurred in 4 patients and was associated with repeated rodding.
Conclusion
We concluded that surgery should be delayed as long as possible. If there is adequate tibial purchase for the rod distally, IMR is the best option. If purchase is inadequate, Ilizarov with rodding will avoid ankle stiffness. Epiphysiodesis is preferable to lengthening because of the risk of fracture above the rod. IVFT is a good option as a secondary procedure.
NO DISCLOSURES
