Abstract
Summary
In the sample studied, reparability of large and massive tears was associated with pre-op ASES and active external rotation in neutral position. Surgical factors affecting reparability were tear size, tendon mobility and shape of the tear.
Introduction
The limited literature has shown good results with partial repairs of large and massive tears of rotator cuff but the role of factors that affect reparability is less clear1–3. The purpose of this study was twofold, 1) to explore the predictive value of clinical and surgical factors on reparability of large and massive rotator cuff tears and 2) to examine the relationship between reparability and clinical and disability measures.
Patients and Methods
This was a secondary data analysis of consecutive patients with large or massive rotator cuff tear who required surgical treatment (full or partial repair) and had returned for their two year follow-up. Disability measures included the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), the relative Constant-Murley score (RCMS) and the shortened version of the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (ShortWORC). The relationship between predictors and reparability was examined through logistic regression and chi-square statistics as appropriate. Within group change over time and between group differences in disability outcomes, range of motion and strength were examined by student's T-tests and non-parametric statistics.
Results
One hundred and fourteen patients (40 women, mean age 64, SD=9) were included in the analysis. There were 79 large (34 fully reparable, 45 partially reparable) and 35 (10 fully reparable, 25 partially reparable) massive tears. Reparability was not associated with age, sex, or pre-operative active flexion or abduction (p>0.05) but the fully repairable tear group showed a better pre-operative ASES score (p=0.01) and a better active external rotation in neutral (p=0.05). Reparability was associated with tear shape (p<0.0001) and size (p=0.007), and tendon mobility (p<0.0001).
Discussion/Conclusion
Among demographics, clinical examination and patient-oriented outcomes, the pre-op scores of the ASES and active external rotation in neutral position were predictive of reparability of a large or massive tear. Surgical variables associated with a partial repair were the tear size, tendon mobility and shape of the tear. Patients with partial repair had a statistically significant improvement in range of motion and strength and all disability scores over time. However, they had less flexion and abduction and reported a higher level of residual disability at 2 years post-operatively.
