Abstract
Introduction
The optimal treatment of high-energy tibia fractures remains controversial. The role of external fixators has been shown to be crucial. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of using either Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF) or Ilizarov frames in treatment of high-energy tibia fractures in a tertiary trauma referral centre.
Methodology
Retrospective review of consecutive series identified two treatment groups; Group 1(TSF) and Group 2 (Ilizarov). Time in frame (healing time) was defined as time from insertion to removal of frame. All patients with incomplete data secondary to loss to follow-up or death were eliminated.
Results
Data was available for 112 patients (Group 1 N37 and Group 2 N85) with average ages for of 46.43 and 44.64 years respectively and a male to female ratio of 23:14 and 63:22. 7 open tibial fractures and 24 distal tibia fractures were treated in Group 1 with 18 open tibia fractures and 24 pilon fractures in Group 2. Average healing time was 174.35 (124–340) and 176.41 (102–555) days respectively. Smoker's average healing time was 181.86 and 213.86 days per group. Non-smokers average healing time was 161.86 and 174 days for the two groups. N5 and N26 patients were recorded as high-energy injuries with associated other multiple fractures or visceral injuries with average frame times of 192.2 and 194.69 days respectively. All fractures went to union with only one infection in the Ilizarov group.
Conclusion
Smoking and associated high-energy injuries lead to an increase in healing time for both groups. Despite the rigid nature of TSF, healing time is similar to Ilizarov frame.
